skip to main content
article

Accountability of Internet access and service providers – strictliability entering ethics?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2001Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Questions regarding the moral responsibility of Internet access and service providers relating to information on the Internet call for a reassessment of the ways in which we think about attributing blame, guilt, and duties of reparation and compensation. They invite us to borrow something similar to the idea of strict liability from the legal sphere and to introduce it in morality and ethical theory. Taking such a category in the distribution of responsibilities outside the domain of law and introducing it into ethics, however, is a difficult thing. Doing so seems to conflict with some broadly shared and deeply felt intuitions regarding the individuality of responsibility and the relationship between responsibility and guilt. These convictions coincide with some basic ideas in Kantian moral theory and the ascriptive theory based on these ideas. Nevertheless, the problems to which the proposed liabilities / responsibilities relate are so serious that they do not seem to leave room for aloofness. At least, they encourage us to reconsider the idea of strict liability carefully and to assess its merits.

References

  1. T.L. Beauchamp and J.F. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Feinberg. Doing and Deserving. Princeton U.P., Princeton NJ, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. Frankena. Ethics, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P.A. French. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. Columbia U.P., New York, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Friedman. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A.H. Goldman. The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H.L.A. Hart. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Johnson. Computer Ethics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. May and S. Hoffman. Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Rowman and Littlefield, Savage MD, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accountability of Internet access and service providers – strictliability entering ethics?
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access