Abstract
This paper addresses alleged contradictions between the use and theory of metaphora in Aristotle. Some authors claim that these inconsistencies are resolved by showing that the use of metaphorai is allowed in the technai and forbidden in the epistemai. This paper instead unpacks Aristotle’s view on language, as it is contained in the semantics of metaphora, to make sense of Aristotle’s statements on metaphora. My proposal is that Aristotle refers to metaphora under different nomenclatures (metaphora, metapherein, and metaphorikon einai) as they relate to the level of linguistic expression, to the perception of similarities, or to the ability to produce metaphors. This threefold distinction helps us understand that the use of metaphora by Aristotle is guided by his idea of the lexis as a means to show the dianoia, and express reality in energeia. This use does not contradict his methodological principles. Lastly, this interpretation also enlightens Aristotle’s understanding of the relations between language, thought, and reality.
References
Barnes, J., ed. 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. S. 1992. Tragic Pleasures: Aristotle on Plot and Emotion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400862573Search in Google Scholar
Cazzullo, A. 1987. La veritá della parola: Ricerca sui fondamenti filosofici della metafora in Aristotele e nei contemporanei. Milano: Jaca.Search in Google Scholar
Gallop, D. 1990. “Animals in the Poetics.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 8, 145–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. 1982. “Aristotle’s Concept of Signification.” In Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy, edited by M. Schofield, and M. C. Nussbaum, 241–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.014Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1981. “Metaphor in the Philosophical Tradition.” In Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, edited by D. Miall, 3–47. Brighton: Harvester Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kosman, L. A. 1994. “Substance, Being, and Energeia.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2:121–49.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Levin, S. R. 1982. “Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 15:24–46.Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. The Revolution of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1968. “The Role of Medical and Biological Analogies in Aristotle’s Ethics.” Phronesis 13:68–83.10.1163/156852868X00047Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. “The Theories and Practices of Demonstration in Aristotle.” In The Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. J. Clearly, and D. C. Shartin. Lauham, MD: University Press of America.10.1163/2213441790X00214Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. “Aristotle’s Zoology and His Metaphysics. The Status Quaestiones. A Critical Review of Some Recent Theories.” In Biologie, Logique el Metaphysique chez Aristote, edited by D. Devereus, and P. Pellegrin, 7–35. Paris: Editions du C.N.R.S.Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. “The Metaphors of Metaphora.” In Aristotelian Explorations, 210–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Marcos, A. 1997. “The Tension Between Aristotle’s Theories and Uses of Metaphor.” Studies in the History and Philosophy Science 28/1:123–39.10.1016/S0039-3681(96)00010-6Search in Google Scholar
Modrak, D. K. W. 2000. Aristotle’s Theory of Language and Meaning. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511609008Search in Google Scholar
Moran, R. 1996. “Artifice and Persuasion: The Work of Metaphor in the Rhetoric.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, edited by A. O. Rorty, 385–96. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Moss, J. D. 1997. “Reclaiming Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Review of Metaphysics 50:635–46.Search in Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1987. “Seeming and Being: Sign and Metaphor in Aristotle.” In Creativity and the Imagination. Case Studies from the Classical Age to the Twentieth Century, edited by Mark Amsler, 11–33. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Search in Google Scholar
Murchland, B. 1993. “Aristotle, Metaphor and the Task of Philosophy.” Philosophical Inquiry 15 (3–4):75–84.10.5840/philinquiry1993153/45Search in Google Scholar
Newman, S. 2005. Aristotle and Style, 129–33. Lewinston-Queenston-Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ortony, A., ed. 1993. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865Search in Google Scholar
Petit, A. 1988. “Métaphore et mathèsis dans la Rhétorique d‘Aristote.” Recherches sur la Philosophie et le Language (La Metaphore) 9:59–71.Search in Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. 1994. “Ta Asteia in Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” In Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle, edited by W. Fortenbaugh, 2–14. New Brunswick: Transaction.Search in Google Scholar
Tamba-Mecz, I., and Paul Veyne. 1979. “Metaphora et comparaison selon Aristote.” Revue des Etudes Grecques 92:77–98.10.3406/reg.1979.4218Search in Google Scholar
Vega, M. 2003. Aristóteles y la metáfora. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Search in Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 1994. “Quand la science parle a la vide: procedes dialectiques et metaphoriques chez Aristote.” In Rhetoriques de la science, edited by Vincent De Coorebyter, 7–32. Paris: P.U.F.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
