Skip to main content
Log in

Agricultural extension in sub-Saharan Africa: Extension typologies and issues for the future

  • Published:
Knowledge and Policy

Abstract

Ever since the extension systems based on Training and Visit (T&V) were started, first in Asia, and since 1981 in sub-Saharan Africa, there have been many writings about T&V. This article gives the various extension typologies possible, and places T&V in a broader perspective. The main message of the article is that the international institutions, donors and academia would, instead of spending their time and energy discussing what are essentially nonissues, serve the countries in the region much better by focusing on areas where improvements should be made to their extension systems in order to enable them to tackle the future issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alders, C., Haverkort, B., and van Veldhuizen, L. (1993).Linking with farmers: Networking for low external input and sustainable agriculture. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, H., Bergmann, H., Diederich, G., Großer, E. Hoffman, V., Keller, P., Payr, G., and Sülzer, R. (1990).Agricultural extension. Eschborn, Germany: German Technical Cooperation (GTZ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Antholt, C.H. (1994). Getting ready for the twenty-first century. World Bank Technical Paper No. 217, Asia Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchee, A. (1994). Agricultural extension in Africa. World Bank Discussion Paper Number 231, Africa Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benor, D., Harrison, J., and Baxter, M. (1984).Agricultural extension—The training and visit system. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindlish, V. & Evenson, R. (1993). Evaluation of the performance of T&V extension in Kenya. World Bank Technical Paper Number 208, Africa Technical Department Series. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindlish, V., Evenson, R., and Gbetibouo, M. (1993). Evaluation of T&V based extension in Burkina Faso. World Bank Technical Paper Number 226, Africa Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhaeuser, D., Evenson, R. and Feder, G. (1991). The economic impact of agricultural extension: A review.Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39(3):607–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M., Coulter, J., and Russell, J. (Eds.) (1985).Research, extension, farmer: A two-way continuum for agricultural development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Pacey, A., and Thrupp, L. (1990).Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoplos, I. & Nitsch, U. (1996).Pluralism and the extension agent: Changing concepts and approaches in rural extension. Publications on Agriculture No. 1, Department for Natural Resources and the Environment. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTA. (1995). Agricultural extension in Africa: Proceedings of an international workshop. Yaounde, Cameroon, January 1994. Technical Center for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Evenson, R. (1993). A note on the contribution of agricultural extension and research to economic growth with evidence from two recent studies in Africa (Kenya and Burkina Faso), (mimeo).

  • Feder, G., & Slade, R. (1984). The acquisition of information and the adoption of new technology.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3):312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., Lau, L.J., and Slade, R. (1985). The impact of agricultural extension: A case study of the training and visit system in Haryana, India. World Bank Staff Working Paper 756. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., Lau, L.J., and Slade, R. (1987). Does agricultural extension pay? The training and visit system in Northwest India.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3):678–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D.J. (1994). Developing sustainable institutions: Lessons from cross-case analysis of 24 agricultural extension programmes.Public Administration and Development, 14, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. and Ruttan, V.W. (1985).Agricultural development: An international perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort, B., van der Kamp, J., and Waters-Bayer, A. (1991).Joining farmers’ experiments: Experiences in participatory technology development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra, W., Reijntjes, C. and van der Werf, E. (1992).Let farmers judge: Experiences in assessing the sustainability of agriculture. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. (1988). Making agricultural extension effective: Lessons of recent experience. In J. Howell (Ed.),Training and visit extension in practice. Occasional Paper No. 8. Agricultural Administration Unit. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, D. (1992). Enhancing organizational effectiveness.Public administration and development, 12:433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lele, U. (1975).The design of rural development: Lessons from Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K.D. (1984). Disintegrating agricultural development.Food Research Institute Studies, XIX, 2:177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (1989). New strategies and successful examples for sustainable development in the Third World. Reprint No. 170. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, R.C. (1993). Explaining success in South Asian rural development: The importance of routine.Public Administration and Development, 13:475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moris, J. (1991). Extension alternatives in tropical Africa. Agricultural Administration Unit, Occasional Paper 7. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1995). The changing role of agricultural extension. In agricultural extension in Africa: Proceedings of an international workshop. Yaounde, Cameroon, January 1994. Technical Center for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Roth, D. (1994). How “integrated” is integrated rural development? The case of the Pompengan Integrated Area Development Project (PIADP), Luwu district, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.Public Administration and Development, 14:377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V.W. (1987). Institutional requirements for sustained agricultural development. In T.J. Davis and I.A. Schirmer (Eds.),Sustainability issues in agricultural development: Proceedings of the Seventh Agriculture Sector Symposium. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V.W. (1984). Integrated rural development programmes: A historical perspective.World Development, 12:393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L. and Kampen, J. (1992). Agricultural extension in East Africa. World Bank Technical Paper Number 164, Africa Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, R. (1995).Seed regulatory frameworks and resource-poor farmers: A literature review. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, V. and Schwartz, L. (1992). Agricultural services initiative: Report based on the World Bank Workshop held in Lilongwe in February 1991. Agriculture and Rural Development Series No. 4. Technical Department, Africa Region. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, V. (1993). Comments on enhancing organizational effectiveness in developing countries: The training and visit system revisited.Public Administration and Development, 13:515–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, V. (1994). Seed systems in sub-Saharan Africa—Issues and options. World Bank Discussion Paper Number 266, Africa Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, V. (1995). The world bank’s experience with T&V in Africa: Issues for the future. InAgricultural extension in Africa. Proceedings of an International Workshop, Yaounde, Cameroon, January 1994. Technical Center for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Werner, J. (1993).Participatory development of agricultural innovations: Procedures and methods of on-farm research. Eschborn, Germany: Technical Cooperation-Federal Republic of Germany (GTZ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijp, W. (1992). From agricultural extension to rural information management. In J.R. Anderson and C. de Haan (Eds.),Public and Private Roles in Agricultural Development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

His professional interests include, besides extension, rural poverty alleviation programs and the development of seed systems. Prior to joining the World Bank he has worked extensively in agricultural and rural development in India. The opinions expressed in this article are his own and do not represent those of the institution to which he belongs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkatesan, V. Agricultural extension in sub-Saharan Africa: Extension typologies and issues for the future. Knowledge and Policy 9, 43–61 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912436

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912436

Keywords

Navigation