Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In sweet harmony or in bitter discord? How cultural values and stakeholder requirements shape and users read an urban computing technology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Culture is, in many ways, implicated in and shapes technology design and use. Inspired by Stuart Hall’s conception of encoding/decoding, we maintain that technological artefacts reflect the cultural values of their creators, while users, in their encounters with the technological artefacts, may decode those artefacts in various ways that are shaped by the users’ cultural values. In this article, we apply this lens to study a decade-long urban computing project that took place in the wild. We focus on the project’s development team and on how their cultural values shape technology design. We also acknowledge that such an urban computing project involves many other stakeholder groups that affect the course of events. In our analysis, we examine how these stakeholders shaped and interpreted the technology in question. Although the development project had a seemingly generic “for all” ethos, the various stakeholders pulled the focus in different directions. The trajectory of the project can be characterized as reacting to these competing influences—sometimes achieving fit, while other times resulting in conflicts. The contribution of this paper is a structured analysis and reflections on cultural issues in community technology design in the wild, with a focus on the role of the developers’ cultural values and other stakeholders’ technology-related requirements and interpretations. This study has implications for subsequent studies in the wild by framing them as fluid settings of a great variety of stakeholders with a multiplicity of values, requirements, and interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriansen HK (2012) Timeline interviews: a tool for conducting life history research. Qual Stud 3(1):40–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajmal MM, Koskinen KU (2008) Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: an organizational culture perspective. Proj Manag J 39(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allaire Y, Firsirotu ME (1984) Theories of organizational culture. Org Stud 5(3):193–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheverst K, Taher F, Fisher M, Fitton D, Taylor N (2012) The design, deployment and evaluation of situated display-based systems to support coordination and community. Ubiquitous display environments, series: cognitive technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford J, Marcus G (eds) (1986) Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinch S, Davies N, Friday A, Efstratiou C (2011) Reflections on the long-term use of an experimental digital signage system. In: Proceedings of UbiComp’11,pp 133–142

  • Czarniawska-Joerges B (1992) Exploring complex organizations. a cultural perspective. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard P, Halskov K (2010) Designing urban media façades: cases and challenges. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, pp 2277–2286

  • Lindtner S, Anderson K, Dourish, P (2012) Cultural appropriation: information technologies as sites of transnational imagination. In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp 77–86

  • Flanagan M, Howe DC, Nissenbaum H (2005) Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005, pp 751–760

  • Friday A, Davies N, Efstratiou C (2012) Reflections on long-term experiments with public displays. Computer 45(5):34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan M, Srite M (2005) Information technology and culture: merging fragmented and holistic perspectives of culture. Inf Organ 15(2):295–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi S, Lockwood C, Glynn MA (2015) The many faces of culture: making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. Acad Manag Ann 9(1):1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grint K, Woolgar S (1997) The machine at work. technology, work and organization. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkola E, Iivari N, Kuure L (2015) Infrastructuring as social action. In: Proceedings of ICIS 2015

  • Hall S (1980) Encoding/decoding. In: Hall S, Hobson D, Lowe A, Willis P (eds) Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. Hutchinson, London, pp 128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari N (2005) Usability specialists–‘a mommy mob’,‘realistic humanists’ or ‘staid researchers’? An analysis of usability work in the software product development. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 418–430

  • Iivari N (2006) ‘Representing the user’ in software development—a cultural analysis of usability work in the product development context. Interact Comput 18(4):635–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari N (2010) Culturally compatible usability work—an interpretive case study on the relationship between usability work and its cultural context in software product development organization. J Org End User Comput 22(3):40–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari J, Iivari N (2011) The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of agile methods. Inf Softw Technol 53(5):509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen OS, Halskov K, Leong TW (2010) Rekindling values in participatory design. In: Proceedings of PDC, pp 91–100

  • Keesing R, Strathern A (1998) Cultural Anthropology. A contemporary perspective, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brave College Publishers, Fort Worth

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber A, Kluckhohn C (1952) Culture: a critical review of the concepts and definitions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukka H, Luusua A, Ylipulli J, Suopajärvi T, Kostakos V, Ojala T (2014) From cyberpunk to calm urban computing: exploring the role of technology in the future cityscape. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 82:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger J (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus A, Gould EW (2000) Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design. Interactions 7(4):32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinviita A, Kuure L, Luoma P (2015) Do we speak the same language?: design goals and culture clashes in an online forum for young people. In: Proceedings of C&T, pp 69–78

  • Memarovic N (2015) Understanding future challenges for networked public display systems in community settings. In: Proceedings of C&T, pp 39–48

  • Memarovic N, Langheinrich M, Cheverst K, Taylor N, Alt F (2013) P-LAYERS—a layered framework addressing the multifaceted issues facing community-supporting public display deployments. ACM Trans Comput Human Interact 20(3):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JK, Friedman B, Jancke G, Gill B (2007) Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation’s groupware system. In: Proceedings of GROUP, pp 281–290

  • Müller J, Walter R, Bailly G, Nischt M, Alt F (2012) Looking glass: A field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp 297–306

  • Myers MD, Newman M (2007) The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf Organ 17:2–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogan A, Walker E, Baker RS, Rebolledo Mendez G, Jimenez Castro M, Laurentino T, de Carvalho A (2012) Collaboration in cognitive tutor use in Latin America: Field study and design recommendations. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp 1381–1390

  • Ojala T, Kukka H, Lindén T, Heikkinen T, Jurmu M, Hosio S, Kruger F (2010) UBI-hotspot 1.0: large-scale long-term deployment of interactive public displays in a City center. In: Proceedings of ICIW, pp 285–294

  • Ortner SB (ed) (1999) The fate of culture. Geertz and beyond. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi W, Wilkins A (1985) Organizational culture. Ann Rev Sociol 11:457–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabiescu AG, David S, van Zyl I, Cantoni L (2014) Emerging spaces in community-based participatory design: reflections from two case studies. In: Proc. PDC,pp 1–10

  • Schein E (1985) Organizational culture and leadership, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan J, Chamberlain K, Dupuis A (2011) Timelining: visualizing experience. Qual Res 11(5):552–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich L (1983) Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Adm Sci Q 28(3):339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ståhlbröst A, Bergvall-Kåreborn B, Ihlström Eriksson C (2015) Stakeholders in smart city living lab processes. In: Proceedings of AMCIS’15, pp 1–11

  • Suopajärvi T, Ylipulli J, Kinnunen T (2012) “Realities behind ICT Dreams”: designing a Ubiquitous City in a living lab environment. Int J Gend Sci Technol 4(2):231–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor N, Cheverst K (2009) Supporting community awareness with interactive displays. Computer 45(5):26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor N, Cheverst K (2010) Creating a rural community display with local engagement. In: Proceedings of DIS’10, pp 218–227

  • Taylor N, Cheverst K, Wright P, Olivier P (2013) Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, pp 1549–1558

  • Tolvanen E, Jylhä M (2005) Alcohol in life story interviews with Finnish people aged 90 or over: stories of gendered morality. J Aging Stud 19(4):419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen J, Barley Stephen R (1984) Occupational communities: culture and control in Organizations. In: Barry M Staw, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 6. JAI Press, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk A (2007) Managing project culture: the case of Environ Mega project. Int J Project Manag 25(3):290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventä-Olkkonen L, Lanamäki A, Iivari N, Kuutti K (2016) It’s a Pain in the… wild?: struggling to create conditions for emerging practices in an urban computing project. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI’16. ,p 51

  • Weber M (1958) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Unwin Hyman, London, Boston, p 1930

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winschiers-Theophilus H, Zaman T, Yeo A (2015) Reducing white elephant ICT4D projects: a community-researcher engagement. In: Proceedings of C&T, pp 99–107

  • Ylipulli J, Suopajärvi T (2013) Contesting ubicomp visions through ICT practices: power negotiation in the meshwork of a technologized city. International Communication Gazette July 11, 2013, pp 1–17

  • Ylipulli J, Luusua A, Kukka H, Ojala T (2014a) Winter is coming: introducing climate sensitive urban computing. In: Proceedings of DIS’14, pp 647–656

  • Ylipulli J, Suopajärvi T, Ojala T, Kostakos V, Kukka H (2014b) Municipal WiFi and interactive displays: appropriation of new technologies in public urban spaces. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 89:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Computer Interaction and Human-Centered Development (INTERACT), Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ITEE), University of Oulu, P.O. BOX 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland

    Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Netta Iivari & Arto Lanamäki

Authors
  1. Leena Ventä-Olkkonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Netta Iivari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arto Lanamäki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leena Ventä-Olkkonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ventä-Olkkonen, L., Iivari, N. & Lanamäki, A. In sweet harmony or in bitter discord? How cultural values and stakeholder requirements shape and users read an urban computing technology. AI & Soc 34, 455–476 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0724-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0724-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation