Abstract
This paper proposes a sender-receiver model to explain two large-scale patterns observed in natural languages: Zipf’s inverse power law relating the frequency of word use and word rank, and the negative correlation between the frequency of word use and rate of lexical change. Computer simulations show that the model recreates Zipf’s inverse power law and the negative correlation between signal frequency and rate of change, provided that agents balance the rates with which they invent new signals and forget old ones. Results are robust across a wide range of parameter values and structural assumptions, such as different forgetting rules and forgetting rates. Analysis of the model further suggests that Zipf’s law relating word frequency and rank arises because of language-external factors and that frequent signals change less because frequent signals are less subject to drift than rare ones. The paper concludes with some brief considerations on model-based and data-driven approaches in philosophy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Pence and Ramsey (2018) offer an overview of data repositories, analytical tools, and related challenges in this emerging field.
References
Alexander, J. M. (2013). Preferential attachment and the search for successful theories. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 769–782.
Alexander, J. M. (2014). Learning to signal in a dynamic world. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65(4), 797–820.
Alexander, J. M., Skyrms, B., & Zabell, S. L. (2012). Inventing new signals. Dynamic Games and Applications, 2(1), 129–145.
Atkinson, Q. D., Meade, A., Venditti, C., Greenhill, S. J., & Pagel, M. (2008). Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science, 319(5863), 588–588.
Barrett, J., & Zollman, K. J. (2009). The role of forgetting in the evolution and learning of language. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 21(4), 293–309.
Barrett, J. A., & LaCroix, T. (2020). Epistemology and the structure of language. Erkenntnis, 1–15.
Blume, A., DeJong, D. V., Kim, Y.-G., & Sprinkle, G. B. (1998). Experimental evidence on the evolution of meaning of messages in sender-receiver games. The American Economic Review, 88(5), 1323–1340.
Blume, A., DeJong, D. V., Kim, Y.-G., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2001). Evolution of communication with partial common interest. Games and Economic Behavior, 37(1), 79–120.
Bruner, J., O’Connor, C., Rubin, H., & Huttegger, S. M. (2014). David Lewis in the lab: Experimental results on the emergence of meaning. Synthese, 1–19.
Byron, J. M. (2007). Whence philosophy of biology? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58(3), 409–422.
Calude, A. S., & Pagel, M. (2011). How do we use language? Shared patterns in the frequency of word use across 17 world languages. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1101–1107.
Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43(1), 1–29.
Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Levinson, S. C., & Gray, R. D. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473(7345), 79.
Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., & Williams, C. B. (1943). The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 42–58.
Gotelli, N. J., & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4(4), 379–391.
Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Bramson, A., Holman, B., McGeehan, S., & Berger, W. J. (2019). Diversity, ability, and expertise in epistemic communities. Philosophy of Science, 86(1), 98–123.
Hoppe, F. M. (1984). Pólya-like urns and the Ewens’ sampling formula. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 20(1), 91–94.
Huttegger, S. M. (2017). The probabilistic foundations of rational learning. Cambridge University Press.
Huttegger, S. M., Skyrms, B., & Zollman, K. J. (2014). Probe and adjust in information transfer games. Erkenntnis, 79(4), 835–853.
i Cancho, R. F., & Solé, R. V. (2003). Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(3), 788–791.
LaCroix, T. (2019). Evolutionary explanations of simple communication: Signalling games and their models. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 1–25
Levy, A. (2011). Game theory, indirect modeling, and the origin of morality. The Journal of Philosophy, 108(4), 171–187.
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press.
Li, W. (1992). Random texts exhibit Zipf’s-law-like word frequency distribution. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38(6), 1842–1845.
Lieberman, E., Michel, J.-B., Jackson, J., Tang, T., & Nowak, M. A. (2007). Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature, 449(7163), 713.
Lynch, M. (2011). The lower bound to the evolution of mutation rates. Genome Biology and Evolution, 3, 1107–1118.
Machery, E., & Cohen, K. (2011). An evidence-based study of the evolutionary behavioral sciences. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(1), 177–226.
Manin, D. Y. (2008). Zipf’s law and avoidance of excessive synonymy. Cognitive Science, 32(7), 1075–1098.
Martini, C., & Pinto, M. F. (2017). Modeling the social organization of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 7(2), 221–238.
McCowan, B., Doyle, L. R., Jenkins, J. M., & Hanser, S. F. (2005). The appropriate use of Zipf’s law in animal communication studies. Animal Behaviour, 69(1), F1–F7.
McCowan, B., Hanser, S. F., & Doyle, L. R. (1999). Quantitative tools for comparing animal communication systems: Information theory applied to bottlenose dolphin whistle repertoires. Animal Behaviour, 57(2), 409–419.
McShea, D. W., & Brandon, R. N. (2010). Biology’s first law: The tendency for diversity and complexity to increase in evolutionary systems. University of Chicago Press.
Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press.
Moreno-Sanchez, I., Font-Clos, F., & Corral, A. (2016). Large-scale analysis of Zipf’s law in English texts. PloS one, 11(1), e0147073.
Overton, J. A. (2013). Explain in scientific discourse. Synthese, 1–23.
Pagel, M., Atkinson, Q. D., & Meade, A. (2007). Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature, 449(7163), 717–720.
Pence, C., & Ramsey, G. (2018). How to do digital philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 930–941.
Piantadosi, S. T. (2014). Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1112–1130.
Roth, A. E., & Erev, I. (1995). Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(1), 164–212.
Rubin, H., O’Connor, C., & Bruner, J. (2019). Experimental economics for philosophers. In E. Fischer & M. Curtis (Eds.), Methodological advances in experimental philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Salge, C., Ay, N., Polani, D., & Prokopenko, M. (2015). Zipf’s law: Balancing signal usage cost and communication efficiency. PLoS one, 10(10), e0139475.
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2017). The origin of meaning in animal signals. Animal Behaviour, 124, 339–346.
Silk, J. B., Kaldor, E., & Boyd, R. (2000). Cheap talk when interests conflict. Animal Behaviour, 59(2), 423–432.
Skyrms, B. (2010). Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press.
Suzuki, R., Buck, J. R., & Tyack, P. L. (2005). The use of Zipf’s law in animal communication analysis. Animal Behaviour, 69(1), F9–F17.
Wagner, E. (2009). Communication and structured correlation. Erkenntnis, 71(3), 377–393.
Wagner, E. O. (2011). Deterministic chaos and the evolution of meaning. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(3), 547–575.
Weingart, S. B. (2015). Finding the History and Philosophy of Science. Erkenntnis, 80(1), 201–213.
Weisberg, M., & Muldoon, R. (2009). Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 76(2), 225–252.
Wray, K. B. (2010). Philosophy of science: What are the key journals in the field? Erkenntnis, 72(3), 423–430.
Zabell, S. L. (1992). Predicting the unpredictable. Synthese, 90(2), 205–232.
Zanette, D., & Montemurro, M. (2005). Dynamics of text generation with realistic Zipf’s distribution. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12(1), 29–40.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wisley.
Zollman, K. J. (2005). Talking to neighbors: The evolution of regional meaning. Philosophy of Science, 72(1), 69–85.
Zollman, K. J. (2010). The epistemic benefit of transient diversity. Erkenntnis, 72(1), 17.
Zollman, K. J., Bergstrom, C. T., & Huttegger, S. M. (2013). Between cheap and costly signals: The evolution of partially honest communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1750), 1–8.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Brian Skyrms, Louis Narens, Cailin O’Connor, Simon Huttegger, Jeffrey Barrett, Travis LaCroix, and other members of the Social Dynamics Seminar at UC Irvine for their comments on an earlier version of this paper. I am equally grateful for the organizers and the audience of the conference “Generalized Theory of Evolution” in Düsseldorf. I would also like to thank Hannah Read for her numerous comments on previous versions of this paper, as well as Gareth Roberts and Justin Bruner for their helpful feedback on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ventura, R. Signaling in an Unknown World. Erkenn 88, 885–905 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00385-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00385-x