Skip to main content
Log in

Aspectual classes and aspectual composition

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aristotle: 1984, ‘Metaphysics’, in:The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation II, 1552–1728, Princeton.

  • Bach, E.: 1979, ‘On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics’, in: R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Academic Press, New York, pp. 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1986, ‘The Algebra of Events’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’.Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and B. Partee: 1978, ‘Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English’. IULC, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthem, J. F. A. K. van: 1983,The Logic of Time. A Modeltheoretic Investigation into the Varieties of Temporal Ontology and Temporal Discourse, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, R. D.: 1981, ‘The Form and Function of Aspect in Russian’, in: M. S. Flier and R. D. Brecht (eds.),Russian Morphosyntax, Slavica Publishers, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L.: 1981, ‘Aspect and Quantification’, in: Tedeschi and Zaenen, pp. 31–64.

  • Comrie, B.: 1976,Aspect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, O.: 1981, ‘On the Definition of the Telic-Atelic (Bounded-Non-bounded) Distinction’, in: Tedeschi and Zaenen, pp. 79–90.

  • Dowty, D. R.: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R.: 1986, ‘The Effects of Aspectual Class on the Temporal Structure of Discourse: Semantics or Pragmatics?’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovvty, D. R.: (in preparation), ‘Aspect and Aktionsart’.

  • Forsyth, J.: 1970,A Grammar of Aspect; Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, A.: 1984,The Logic of Aspect; An Axiomatic Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. S.: 1976,Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1984,Categorial Morphology, Diss. RUG.

  • Jackendoff, R. S.: 1976, ‘Toward an Explanatory Semantic Representation’,Linguistic Inquiry 7, 89–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. S.: 1983,Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J.: 1982,Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen, Fink Verlag, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsohn, H.: 1933, ‘Aspektfragen’,Indogermanische Forschungen 51, 292–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, F. M. G. de and H. J. Verkuyl: 1985, ‘Generalized Quantifiers: the Properness of their Strength’, in: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.),Generalized Quantifiers: Theory and Applications, GRASS 4, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1979, ‘Events, Instants, and Temporal Reference’, in: R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin etc., pp. 376–416.

  • Kamp, H.; 1980, ‘Some remarks on the Logic of Change, Part I’, in: Ch. Rohrer (ed.),Time, tense and Quantifiers, Max Niemeyer verlag, Tübingen 1980, pp. 135–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. I. and J. Stavi: 1986, ‘A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A.: 1963,Action, Emotion and Will, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. N.: 1969,Towards a Semantic Description of English, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulen, Alice ter: 1983, ‘The Representation of Time in Natural Language’, in Alice ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, GRASS 1. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulen, Alice ter: 1984, ‘Events, Quantities and Individuals’, in: F. Landman and F. Veltrnan (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourelatos, A. P. D.: 1981, ‘Events, Processes and States’, in Tedeschi and Zaenen, pp. 191–211.

  • Parsons, T.: 1985, ‘The Progressive in English: Events, States and Processes’, unpublished paper.

  • Partee, B. H.: 1980, ‘Montague Grammar, Mental Representation and Reality’ in S. Kanger and S. Öhman (eds.),Philosophy and Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzaek, C.: 1979,The Semantic Interpretation of Aspect and Aktionsarten. A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, H.: 1926,A Grammar of Late Modern English II; The Parts of Speech II, ‘The Verb and its Particles’, Noordhoff, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1978,Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949,The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streitberg, W.: 1889,Perfective und imperfective Actionsart im Germanischen I, Halle a.S., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.: 1977, ‘Tense and Continuity’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, P. J. and A. Zaenen, (eds.): 1981,Syntax and Semantics 14; Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, P.: 1980, ‘The Semantics of Episodic Verbs’,Theoretical Linguistics 7, 262–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, A.: 1982, ‘Invariance and the Syntax of Russian Aspect’, in P. J. Hopper (ed.),Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics & Pragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterman/Philadelphia, pp. 305–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Togeby, O.: 1980, ‘Negation and Aspect’, in E. Hovdahaugen (ed.),The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, Oslo, pp. 64–80.

  • Vendler, Z.: 1967,Linguistics in Philosophy, Comell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1972,On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1976, ‘Interpretive Rules and the Description of the Aspects’,Foundations of Language 14, 471–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1978, ‘Thematic Relations and the Semantic Representation of Verbs Expressing Change’,Studies in Language 2, 199–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1985, ‘Temporal Insulation: On the Construction of Events’,Dutch Crossing 27, 22–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1987a, ‘Nondurative Closure of Events’, in J. A. G. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. J. B. Stokhof (eds.),Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1988, ‘Aspectual Asymmetry and Quantification’, in V. Ehrich and H. Vater (eds.),Temporalsemantik. Beiträge zuer Linguistik der Zeitreferenz, (Proceedings of the Heidelberg workshop on Tense and Aspect 1986). De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 220–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1987b, ‘Aspect, Quantification and Negation’, inProceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 1987, ITLI-publication, pp. 353–372.

  • Vlach, F.: 1981, ‘The Semantics of the Progressive’, in Tedeschi and Zaenen (eds.), pp. 271–292.

  • Zwarts, F.: 1981, ‘Negatief Polaire Uitdrukkingen’,Glot 4, 35–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, F.: 1983, ‘Determiners: A Relational Perspective’, in A. G. B. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, GRASS 1, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verkuyl, H.J. Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguist Philos 12, 39–94 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627398

Keywords

Navigation