Abstract
Autism research is facing profound difficulties. The lack of clinically valuable translations from the biomedical and neurosciences, the variability and heterogeneity of the diagnostic category, and the lack of control over the ‘autism epidemic,’ are among the most urgent problems facing autism today. Instead of encouraging the prevailing tendency to intensify neurobiological research on the nature of autism, I argue for an exploration of alternative disease concepts. One conceivable alternative framework for understanding disease and those we have come to call autistic, can be found in the work of neurologist Kurt Goldstein (1878–1965). His person-centered approach provides radically new ways to investigate and intervene with the behavior we are accustomed to explain by the elusive entity called autism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Part of this need is motivated by financial rewards; a recent economic analysis estimated the cost of autism was more than that of any other medical or psychiatric condition (Buescher et al. 2014).
Historical variability of the concept of autism, heterogeneity in symptomatology, the lack of successful translations from bench to bedside (no biomarkers), the expanding boundaries of autism, and an increasingly complex picture of autism’s neurobiology are few of the fundamental problems of current autism research.
Later translated as The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man.
For Goldstein, this atomistic method “intended to designate any method which uses a dissecting procedure and tries to derive laws from the parts studied” (Goldstein 1963, p. 3).
See e.g., Canguilhem, Knowledge of Life (2008), pp. 113–114 and 129–132 and The Normal and the Pathological (1991), pp. 181–196.
Obviously, Goldstein’s (crypto-) teleological image of man is not unambiguous. For discussions on vitalism and teleology in relation to the work of Goldstein, see Ferrario and Corsi (2013).
These numbers are based on Google Scholar Citations.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bauman, M. D., & Schumann, C. M. (2013). Is “bench to bedside” realistic for autism? An integrative neuroscience approach. Neuropsychiatry, 3, 159–168.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2010). Which neurodevelopmental disorders get researched and why? PLoS One, 5, e155112.
Bracken, P., et al. (2012). Psychiatry beyond the current paradigm. British Journal of Psychiatry, 201, 430–434.
Buescher, A. V. S., Cidav, Z., Knapp, M., & Mandell, D. S. (2014). Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States. JAMA Pediatrics, 8, 721–728.
Canguilhem, G. (1991). The normal and the pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Canguilhem, G. (2008). Knowledge of life. New York: Fordham University Press.
Canguilhem, G. (2012). Writings on medicine. New York: Fordham University Press.
Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, 126.
Evans, B. (2013). How autism became autism: The radical transformation of a central concept of child development in Britain. History of the Human Sciences, 26, 3–31.
Ferrario, C. E., & Corsi, L. (2013). Vitalism and teleology in Kurt Goldstein’s organismic approach. In S. Normandin & C. T. Wolfe (Eds.), Vitalism and the scientific image in post-enlightenment life science, 1800–2010 (pp. 205–241). Dordrecht: Springer.
Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (originally published in German in 1935).
Frances, A. J. (2013). Saving normal: An insider’s revolt against out-of- control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. New York: William Morrow.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Fuchs, T. (2009). Embodied cognitive neuroscience and its consequences for psychiatry. Poiesis & Praxis, 6, 219–233.
Geroulanos, S., & Meyers, T. (2012). Introduction: Georges Canguilhem’s critique of medical reason. In G. Canguilhem (Ed.), Writings on medicine (pp. 1–24). New York: Fordham University Press.
Goldstein, K. (1959). Abnormal mental conditions in infancy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 128, 538–557.
Goldstein, K. (1963). Human nature in the light of psychopathology. Oxford, England: Harvard University Press.
Goldstein, K. (1995). The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (originally published in German in 1934).
Goldstein, K., & Scheerer, M. (1941). Abstract and concrete behavior an experimental study with special tests. Psychological Monographs, 53, 1–10.
Happé, F. (2011). Criteria, categories, and continua: Autism and related disorders in DSM-5. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 540–542.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2014). Towards a developmental neuroscience of atypical social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 553–577.
Harrington, A. (1998). Kurt Goldstein’s neurology of healing and wholeness: A Weimar story. In C. Lawrence & G. Weisz (Eds.), Greater than the parts: Holism in biomedicine (pp. 25–45). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hau, M. (2000). The holistic gaze in German Medicine, 1890–1930. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 74, 495–524.
Hill, E. L. (2004). Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 26–32.
Insel, T. R. (2014). Mental disorders in childhood: shifting the focus from behavioral symptoms to neurodevelopmental trajectories. JAMA, 311, 1727–1728.
Jeste, S. S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2014). Disentangling the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder through genetic findings. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10, 74–81.
Jutel, A. (2013). When pigs could fly: Influenza and the elusive nature of diagnosis. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 56, 513–529.
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.
Kapur, S., Phillips, A. G., & Insel, T. R. (2012). Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it? Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 1174–1179.
Kennedy, D. P., & Adolphs, R. (2012). The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 559–572.
Noppeney, U. (2001). Kurt Goldstein—A philosophical scientist. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 10, 67–78.
Rosenberg, C. E. (1998). Holism in twentieth-century medicine. In C. Lawrence & G. Weisz (Eds.), Greater than the parts: Holism in biomedicine (pp. 335–356). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenberg, C. E. (2002). The tyranny of diagnosis: Specific entities and individual experience. Milbank Quarterly, 80, 237–260.
Rosenberg, C. E. (2006). Contested boundaries: Psychiatry, disease, and diagnosis. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49, 407–424.
Rutter, M. (2014). Addressing the issue of fractionation in autism spectrum disorder: A commentary on Brunsdon & Happé, Frazier et al., Hobson & Mandy et al. Autism, 18, 55–57.
Silverman, C. (2008). Fieldwork on another planet: Social science perspectives on the autism spectrum. BioSocieties, 3, 325–341.
Slaby, J. (2010). Steps towards a critical neuroscience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Neurosciences, 9, 397–416.
Temkin, O. (1977). The double face of janus and other essays in the history of medicine. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Timmermann, C. (2001). Constitutional medicine, neoromanticism, and the politics of antimechanism in interwar Germany. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 75(4), 717–739.
Verhoeff, B. (2012). What is this thing called autism? A critical analysis of the tenacious search for autism’s essence. Biosocieties, 7, 410–432.
Verhoeff, B. (2013). The autism puzzle: Challenging a mechanistic model on conceptual and historical grounds. Philosophy Ethics Humanities and Medicine, 8, 17.
Verhoeff, B. (2014). Stabilizing autism: A Fleckian account of the rise of a neurodevelopmental spectrum disorder. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 46, 65–78.
Verhoeff, B. (2015). Fundamental challenges for autism research: The science-practice gap, demarcating autism and the unsuccessful search for the neurobiological basis of autism. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 18, 443–447.
Waterhouse, L. (2013). Rethinking autism: Variation and complexity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wolfe, C. T. (2015). Was Canguilhem a Biochauvinist? Goldstein, Canguilhem and the project of biophilosophy. In D. Meacham (Ed.), Medicine and society, new perspectives in continental philosophy (pp. 197–212). Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verhoeff, B. Kurt Goldstein on autism; exploring a person-centered style of psychiatric thought. HPLS 38, 117–137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-016-0099-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-016-0099-9