Skip to main content
Log in

The Unfolding of Language as Hysteron Proteron: Heterochrony and Extended Connectivity

  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper it is championed that a two stages hypothesis for the evolution of language must take into account a qualified approach to heterochrony and the available information from the archaeological record. As it seems, a protracted childhood and youth was already at work in Homo erectus, but early postnatal brain growth (usually called secondary altriciality) was only available to Homo sapiens. According to these facts, the term hysteron proteron is given here to the reversal that sets off linguistic capacity during the first three years of life, upon the ancient abilities for social, natural and technological knowledge, which were already established during the last 2 Mya BP. The unfolding of linguistic capacity creates the typical effect that ontogeny reverses phylogeny: since late postnatal brain growth, quite recent in evolution, launches in ontogeny before the phylogenetically old processes of playing and learning take place during childhood and youth. Full symbolic abilities may be explained as emerging from older semiotic competences based on iconicity (figuration) and indexicality (metonymy), which would have presumably sustained human life for millennia. Furthermore, it is argued that the formation of linguistic categories follows from that overlaying of extended connectivity linked to early postnatal brain growth, inasmuch as it entangles and transforms previous iconic and referential information: i.e. the ancient semiotic capacities for proprioception, embodiment, extended mimesis and pragmatic knowledge, shaping a sort of self-organization process that provides the formal and semantic properties we find in articulated languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J. (1996). The seeds of speech: language origin and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, M. A. (Ed.). (2006). From action to language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balari, S., & Lorenzo, G. (2013). Computational phenotypes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2010). On the origin of language. Biosemiotics, 3(2), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1985). Mind and nature. London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bax, M., van Heusden, B., & Wildgen, W. (Eds.). (2004). Semiotic evolution and the dynamics of culture. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernárdez, E. (2008). Collective cognition and individual activity: variation, language and culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind, vol. 2: sociocultural situatedness (pp. 137–167). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caianiello, S. (1999). La duplice natura dell’uomo: la polarità come matrice generativa del mondo storico da Humboldt a Droysen. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caianiello, S. (2014). Immagini dello svilupo da Gould a evo-devo. In S. Caianiello (Ed.), Da Gould a evo–devo. Percorsi storici e teorici (pp. 51–82). Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche: Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1964). Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (2007). The importance of not being earnest. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (2015). Hominin language development: a new method of archaeological assessment. Biosemiotics, 8(1), 67–90. doi:10.1007/s12304-014-9198-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1852). Théorie positive du langage humain. In Système de politique positive, II, 4 (pp. 216–262). Paris: Carilian-Goeury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corballis, M. C. (2003). From hand to mouth: the origins of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccio, V. (2014). From a bodily-based format of knowledge to symbols. The evolution of human language. Biosemiotics, 7(1), 49–61. doi:10.1007/s12304-013-9184-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (1993). Vico, metaphor, and the origin of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, B., Sandler, W., & Kirby, S. (2012). New perspectives on duality of patterning. Language and Cognition, 4(4), 251–259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (2003). Universal grammar and semiotic constraints. In H. Morten, H. Cristiansen, et al. (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 111–139). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (2011). Incomplete nature. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. W. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. W. (2010). The exographic revolution. In L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The cognitive live of things (pp. 71–79). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. (2004). The human story. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsworth, H. M., Warrener, A. G., Deacon, T., Ellison, P. T., & Pontzer, H. (2012). Metabolic hypothesis for human altriciality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15212–15216. doi:10.1073/pnas.1205282109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M. (2005). Wider than the sky: view of consciousness. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feixa, C. (2011). Past and present in adolescence in society: the “teen brain” debate in perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1634–1643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gessinger, J. (Ed.). (1989). Theorien vom Ursprung der Sprache. New York: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotics: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2006). The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2007). The genesis of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillert, D. G. (2015). On the evolving biology of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1796. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01796.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hublin, J.-J. (2005). Evolution of the human brain and comparative paleonthropology. In S. Dehaene, J.-R. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkey brain to human brain (pp. 57–71). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hublin, J.-J., Neubauer, S., & Gunz, P. (2015). Brain ontogeny and life history in Pleistocene hominins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20140062. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. (2011). Soul dust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J. R. (2007). The origins of meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four fimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S. (1999). Selection and innateness: the emergence of language universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., & Jamakido, H. (Eds.). (2010). The evolution of human language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, G. (2007). ¿Y si el lenguaje tiene cien mil años? Explorando las consecuencias de la datación del FOXP2 humano. Ludus Vitalis, XV, 27, 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: a theory of material engagement. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. Boston: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. R. (1996). The prehistory of the mind. London: Thams and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. R. (2005). The singing neanderthals: the origins of music, language, mind and body. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A. (1971). Touching: the human significance of the skin. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A. (1981). Growing young. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (1973). Le paradigme perdu: La nature humaine. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E., & Piatelli-Palmarini, P. (Eds.). (1974). L’unité de l’homme: invariants biologiques et universaux culturels. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, W., & Davidson, I. (1996). Human evolution, language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oller, K. D., & Griebel, U. (Eds.). (2008). Evolution of communicative flexibility. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2013). Mind and its evolution. New York: Psycology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The tell–tale brain. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (2008). Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: the factuality of value and of the sacred. In C. Renfrew, C. Firth & L. Malafouris, (Eds.), The sapient mind: archeology meets neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1499), pp. 2041–2048.

  • Schilhab, T., Stjernfelt, F., & Deacon, T. (Eds.). (2012). The symbolic species evolved. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips, T. (2014). Speaking our minds. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1979). Iconicity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), The sign and its masters (pp. 107–127). Austin: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1996). Signs, bridges and origins. In J. Trabant (Ed.), Origins of language (pp. 89–115). Budapest: Collegium Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, B. (1952). Der Aufbau der Sprache. Hamburg: Claasen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, L. (Ed.). (2013). Origins of mind. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. L., Krovitz, G., & Nelson, A. (Eds.). (2003). Patterns of growth and development in the genus homo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torey, Z. (2009). The crucible of conscience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trabant, J. (1986). Apeliotes, oder Der Sinn der Sprache. Munich: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana, A. (2014). Ramon Llull’s sixth sense. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft, 24, 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana, A. (2015). Tempesta de signes: Giambattista Vico i Charles S. Peirce. Lleida: Pagès editors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildgen, W. (2004). The evolution of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J., & Frank, R. M. (Eds.). (2007). Body, language and mind. New York: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev, J. (2014). Human uniqueness, bodily mimesis and the evolution of human language. Humana. Mente, Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amadeu Viana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viana, A. The Unfolding of Language as Hysteron Proteron: Heterochrony and Extended Connectivity. Biosemiotics 10, 379–395 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-017-9292-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-017-9292-9

Keywords

Navigation