Skip to main content
Log in

From opportunism to nascent conservation

The case of the Siona-Secoya

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Siona-Secoya hunters of the northwest Amazon strive to maximize short-term yields to provision their households with meat. The observed patterns of hunting more closely resemble the predictions of optimal foraging theory (OFT) than they do a conservation ethic. In the past the Siona-Secoya worried little about conservation because they believed that good shamans attracted abundant game. When hunting was poor, shamans performedyagé ceremonies and appealed to supernatural gamekeepers for the release of more animals from the underworld. The sustainability of Siona-Secoya hunting was aided by factors such as low human population density, dispersed settlements within large hunting territories, settlement movement, and limited hunting technology. Today, increasing involvement in the national economy is leading the Siona-Secoya to invest more time in agriculture and wage labor, and less in traditional foraging activities. Colonization, deforestation, and industrial pollution now pose the greatest threats to wildlife in eastern Ecuador. Because of these changes, the Siona-Secoya are becoming interested in environmental protection and conservation. Several of their efforts to protect forest resources and mitigate pollution are discussed and evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvard, M. 1992 Are Piro Hunters Prudent Predators? Intraspecific Prey Choice in Amazonia. Unpublished manuscript.

  • 1993a Testing the “Ecologically Noble Savage” Hypothesis: Interspecific Prey Choice by Piro Hunters of Amazonian Peru.Human Ecology 21(4):355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1993bTesting the Ecologically Noble Savage Hypothesis: Conservation and Subsistence Hunting by the Piro of Amazonian Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994 Conservation by Native Peoples: Prey Choice in a Depleted Habitat.Human Nature 5:127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, J. M., and C. Ayres 1979 Aspectos da Caça no Alto Rio Aripuaná.Acta Amazonica 9(2):287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baksh, M. 1985 Faunal Food as a “Limiting Factor” on Amazonian Cultural Behavior: A Machiguenga Example.Research in Economic Anthropology 7:145–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, E. 1973The Kalapalo Indians of Central Brazil. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, S. 1980 Fishing and Hunting by the Barí of Colombia. InWorking Papers on South American Indians, No. 2, R. B. Hames, ed. Pp. 67–109. Bennington, Vermont: Bennington College.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 Carpe Diem: An Optimal Foraging Approach to Barí Fishing and Hunting. InAdaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, R. B. Hames and W. T. Vickers, eds. Pp. 269–299. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénéfice E., and H. Barral 1991 Differences in Life Style and Nutritional Status between Settlers and Siona-Secoya Indians Living in the Same Amazonian Milieu.Ecology of Food and Nutrition 25:307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, R. W. 1980Amazon Economics: The Simplicity of Shipibo Indians Wealth. Dellplain Latin American Studies, No. 6. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., and E. A. Berlin 1983 Adaptation and Ethnozoological Classification: Theoretical Implications of Animal Resources and Diet of the Aguaruna and Huambisa. InAdaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, R. B. Hames and W. T. Vickers, eds. Pp. 301–325. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, R. 1957Subsistence and Social Structure: An Ecological Study of the Kuikuru Indians. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. 1976 Optimal Foraging: The Marginal Value Theorem.Theoretical Population Biology 9(2):129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernela, J. M. 1989 Managing Rivers of Hunger: The Tukano of Brazil. InResource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies, D. A. Posey and W. Balée, eds. Pp. 238–248. Advances in Economic Botany, Vol. 7. Bronx, New York: The New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992The Wanano Indians of the Brazilian Amazon: A Sense of Space. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W. M. 1971 Campa Subsistence in the Gran Pajonal, Eastern Peru.Geographical Review 61:496–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. F. 1980 The Density and Biomass of Tropical Mammals. InConservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox, eds. Pp. 35–55. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. F., M. A. O’Connell, and P. V. August 1979 Density, Productivity, and Distribution of Mammals in Two Venezuelan Habitats. InVertebrate Ecology in the Northern Neotropics, J. F. Eisenberg, ed. Pp. 187–207. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, E. E. 1966Area Handbook for Ecuador. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, N. M. 1983 Seasonal Factors in Subsistence, Nutrition, and Child Growth in a Central Brazilian Indian Community. InAdaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, R. B. Hames and W. T. Vickers, eds. Pp. 357–390. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1973Energy and Protein Requirements. FAO Nutrition Meetings Report Series No. 52. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gragson, T. L. 1992a Fishing the Waters of Amazonia: Native Subsistence Economies in a Tropical Rainforest.American Anthropologist 92:428–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1992b Strategic Procurement of Fish by the Pumé: A South American “Fishing Culture.”Human Ecology 20(1):109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. 1975 Protein Capture and Cultural Development in the Amazon Basin.American Anthropologist 77:526–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. B. 1979 A Comparison of the Efficiencies of the Shotgun and the Bow in Neotropical Forest Hunting.Human Ecology 7(3):219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1980 Game Depletion and Hunting Zone Rotation among the Ye’kwana and Yanomamo of Amazonas, Venezuela. InWorking Papers on South American Indians, No. 2, R. B. Hames, ed. Pp. 31–66. Bennington, Vermont: Bennington College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. B., and W. T. Vickers 1982 Optimal Diet Breadth Theory as a Model to Explain Variability in Amazonian Hunting.American Ethnologist 9(2):358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. 1977Cannibals and Kings: The Origins of Cultures. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., K. Hill, and J. F. O’Connell 1982 Why Hunters Gather: Optimal Foraging and the Aché of Eastern Paraguay.American Ethnologist 9(2):379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Camacho, J., and R. W. Cooper 1976 The Nonhuman Primates of Colombia. InNeotropical Primates: Field Studies and Conservation, R. W. Thorington, Jr., and P. G. Heltne, eds. Pp. 35–69. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., and K. Hawkes 1983 Neotropical Hunting among the Aché of Eastern Paraguay. InAdaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, R. B. Hames and W. T. Vickers, eds. Pp. 139–188. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, O. R., and A. Johnson 1975 Male/Female Relations and the Organization of Work in a Machiguenga Community.American Ethnologist 2(4):634–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., and C. A. Behrens 1982 Nutritional Criteria in Machiguenga Food Production Decisions: A Linear Programming Analysis.Human Ecology 10(2):167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimerling, J., S. J. Scherr, J. E. Gibson, G. Prickett, J. Gale, and L. Fischer 1991Amazon Crude. Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Defense Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., and E. R. Pianka 1966 On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment.American Naturalist 100:603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, J. T. 1970The Discovery of the Amazon According to the Account of Friar Gaspar de Carvajal and Other Documents, H. C. Heaton, ed. New York: AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers, B. 1975 Application of the Biological Model of Diversification to Cultural Distributions in Lowland South America.Biotropica 7(3):141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. F., and B. Quain 1955The Trumai Indians of Central Brazil. American Ethnological Society Monograph No. 24. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A. 1993 Do Amazonian Indians Conserve Their Environment? And Who Are We to Know If They Do or Do Not?Abstracts, 92nd Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association. P. 473. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A., and W. Balée 1989Resource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, Vol. 7. Bronx, New York: The New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. 1984Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K. 1991 The Ecologically Noble Savage.Cultural Survival Quarterly 15(1):46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K., and J. G. Robinson 1985 Hunting by Indigenous Peoples and Conservation of Game Species.Cultural Survival Quarterly 9(1):41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 The Game of Choice: Patterns of Indian and Colonist Hunting in the Neotropics.American Anthropologist 89:650–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo 1971Amazonian Cosmos: The Sexual and Religious Symbolism of the Tukano Indians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G., and K. Redford 1991 Sustainable Harvest of Neotropical Forest Mammals. InNeotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation, J. G. Robinson and K. H. Redford, eds. Pp. 415–429. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. 1976The Achuarä Jívaro: Cultural Adaptation in the Upper Amazon. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 Food Taboos, Diet, and Hunting Strategy: The Adaptation to Animals in Amazon Cultural Ecology.Current Anthropology 19:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salpukas, A. 1993 Ecuadorean Indians Suing Texaco.The New York Times (November 4):C3. (National Edition)

  • Smith, E. A. 1983 Anthropological Applications of Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review.Current Anthropology 24:625–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. 1976 Utilization of Game along Brazil’s Transamazon Highway.Acta Amazonica 6(4):455–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocks, A. 1983 Cocamilla Fishing: Patch Modification and Environmental Buffering in the Amazon Várzea. InAdaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, R. B. Hames and W. T. Vickers, eds. Pp. 239–267. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Resolution 217(A)(III) of the General Assembly, December 10, 1948.

  • Vickers, W. T. 1976Cultural Adaptation to Amazonian Habitats: The Siona-Secoya of Eastern Ecuador. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 An Analysis of Amazonian Hunting Yields as a Function of Settlement Age. InWorking Papers on South American Indians, No. 2, R. B. Hames, ed. Pp. 7–29. Bennington, Vermont: Bennington College.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 The Faunal Components of Lowland South American Hunting Kills.Interciencia 9(6):366–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988a Game Depletion Hypothesis of Amazonian Adaptation: Data from a Native Community.Science 239:1521–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1988b Processes and Problems of Land Demarcation for a Native Amazonian Community in Ecuador.Law and Anthropology, Internationales Jahrbuch für Rechtsanthropologie (Vienna) 3:203–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989Los Sionas y Secoyas: Su Adaptación al Ambiente Amazónico. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991 Hunting Yields and Game Composition over Ten Years in an Amazon Indian Territory. InNeotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation, J. G. Robinson and K. H. Redford, eds. Pp. 53–81. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 Changing Tropical Forest Resource Management Strategies among the Siona-Secoya Indians. InTropical Forests, People and Food: Biocultural Interactions and Applications to Development, C. M. Hladik, A. Hladik, O. F. Linares, H. Pagezy, A. Semple, and M. Hadley, eds. Pp. 463–478. Man in the Biosphere Vol. 13. Paris: UNESCO/Parthenon Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreugdenhil, D. 1978Inventario de las áreas silvestres de la cuenca Amazónica Ecuatoriana, segunda impresión. Quito, Ecuador: Dirección General de Desarrollo Forestal y Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderóa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B., and E. A. Smith, eds. 1981Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, J. A., and P. M. Kelley 1983 Shotguns, Blowguns, and Spears: The Analysis of Technological Efficiency. InAdaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, R. B. Hames and W. T. Vickers, eds. Pp. 189–224. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

My research among the Siona-Secoya has been supported by the Henry L. and Grace Doherty Charitable Foundation, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Florida International University Foundation, Inc., Cultural Survival, Inc., and the Latin American and Caribbean Center and College of Arts and Sciences of Florida International University. Host-country affiliations were provided by theInstituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia and theInstituto Nacional de Colonización de la Región Amazónica Ecuatoriana. Analysis of the data during a sabbatical was supported by the School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico and a Resident Scholar Fellowship from the National Endowment for the Humanities. I am indebted to all of the Siona and Secoya people who cooperated in the study, and especially E. Piaguaje, E. Lusitande, and J. Lusitande, who were research assistants.

William T. Vickers is a professor of anthropology at Florida International University. He has conducted ethnological fieldwork in Ecuador, Peru, and Mexico, focusing primarily on the human and social ecology of native communities. He has published many articles and monographs on this research and has also served as a consultant to the government of Ecuador on the demarcation and legalization of communal lands for indigenous people. He recently received a Fulbright Scholar award for research on Siona-Secoya ethnohistory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vickers, W.T. From opportunism to nascent conservation. Human Nature 5, 307–337 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734164

Key words

Navigation