Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DUTCH BOOKS, DUTCH STRATEGIES AND WHAT THEY SHOW ABOUT RATIONALITY

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Adams, E.W. and Rosenkrantz, R.D. (1980): ‘Applying the Jeffrey Decision Model to Rational Betting and Information Aacquisition’, Theory and Decision 12, pp. 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. (1991): ‘Clever Bookies and Coherent Beliefs’, The Philosophical Review C, pp. 229-247.

  • Goldstein, M. (1983): ‘The Prevision of a Prevision’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 78, pp. 817-819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1989): Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. and Chihara, C. (1979): ‘The Dutch Book Argument: Its Logical Flaws, its Subjective Sources’, Philosophical Studies 36, pp. 19-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, P. (1992): ‘Diachronic Rationality’, Philosophy of Science 59, pp. 120- 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, P. (1993), Betting on Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1993): Warrant: The Current Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. F. (1926): ‘Truth and Probability’, in H. Kyburg and H. Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, Huntington,NY: Robert E. Kreiger Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (1975): Choice and Chance, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (1987): ‘Coherence’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Scientific Inquiry in Philosophical Perspective, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P. (1976): ‘Conditionalization, Observation and Change of Preference’, in W. Harper and C.A. Hooker (eds.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (1995): ‘Belief and the Problem of Ulysses and the Sirens’, Philosophical Studies 77, pp. 7-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.C. (1984): ‘Belief and the Will’, Journal of Philosophy 81, pp. 235-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.C. (1987): ‘Symmetries of Personal Probability Kinematics’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Scientific Inquiry in Philosophical Perspective, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA

    Susan Vineberg

Authors
  1. Susan Vineberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vineberg, S. DUTCH BOOKS, DUTCH STRATEGIES AND WHAT THEY SHOW ABOUT RATIONALITY. Philosophical Studies 86, 185–201 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017932926382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017932926382

Keywords

Search

Navigation