Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of being at variance

  • Book Review Essay
  • Published:
Human Affairs

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Dewey, J. ([1935] 1987). Peirce’s Theory of Quality. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.). The Later Works, 1925–1935, Vol. 11. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frega, R. (2012). Practice, Judgment, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement. A Pragmatist Account. Lanham etc.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, M. (2009). Der bewusste Ausdrück. Anthropologie der Artikulation. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Ch. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, voll. 1–4 ed. by Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss; voll. 7–8 ed. by A. W. Burke. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tullio Viola.

Additional information

Roberto Frega (2012). Practice, Judgment, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement. A Pragmatist Account. Lanham etc.: Lexington Books.

About this article

Cite this article

Viola, T. The importance of being at variance. Humaff 23, 458–468 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0141-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0141-5

Navigation