Skip to main content
Log in

Contexts in Dynamic Predicate Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a notion of context for Groenendijk & Stokhof's Dynamic Predicate Logic DPL. We use these contexts to give a characterization of the relations on assignments that can be generated by composition from tests and random resettings in the case that we are working over an infinite domain. These relations are precisely the ones expressible in DPL if we allow ourselves arbitrary tests as a starting point. We discuss some possible extensions of DPL and the way these extensions interact with our notion of context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barendregt, H.P., 1984, The Lambda Calculus, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt, H.P., 1991, “Functional programming and lambda calculus,” pp. 321–363 in Formal Models and Semantics, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. B, J. van Leeuwen, ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt, H.P., 1992, “Lambda calculi with types,” pp. 117–309 in Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, Vol. 2, S. Ambramsky, D.M. Gabbay, and T.S.E. Maibaum, eds., Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, J., 1991, “Dynamic predicate logic,” Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M., and Veltman, F., 1996, “Coreference and modality,” pp. 179–213 in Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, S. Lappin, ed., Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I., 1983, “File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness,” pp. 164–189 in Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow, eds., Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenberg, M. and Vermeulen, C.F.M., 1994, “Counting variables in a dynamic setting,” Logic Group Preprint Series LGPS-125, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University. Also in: Journal of Logic and Computation 6, 1996, 725–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B., 1991, “Categorical type theory,” Ph.D. Thesis, Nijmegen University.

  • Kamp, H., 1981, “A theory of truth and semantic representation,” pp. 1–41 in Truth, Interpretation and Information, J. Groenendijk, T. Jansen, and M. Stokhof, eds., Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klop, J.W., 1992, “Term rewriting systems,” pp. 1–116 in Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, Vol. 2, S. Ambramsky, D.M. Gabbay, and T.S.E. Maibaum, eds., Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J., 1991, “Type systems for programming languages,” pp. 365–458 in Formal Models and Semantics, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. B, J. van Leeuwen, ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R., 1991, “Anaphora and the logic of change,” pp. 414–430 in '90, European Workshop on Logics in AI, J. van Eijck, ed., Springer Lecture Notes, Vol. 478, Berlin: SpringerVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederpelt, R., Geuvers, J.H., and de Vrijer, R.C., eds., 1994, Selected Papers on Automath, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troelstra, A.S. and van Dalen, D., 1988a, Constructivism in Mathematics, Vol. 1, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 121, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troelstra, A.S. and van Dalen, D., 1988b, Constructivism in Mathematics, Vol. 2, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 123, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, F., 1996, “Defaults in update semantics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 221–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, C.F.M., 1993, “Sequence semantics for dynamic predicate logic,” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2, 217–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, C.F.M., 1995, “Merging without mystery, variables in dynamic semantics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 24, 405–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, A., 1994, “Actions under presuppositions,” pp. 196–233, in Logic and Information Flow, J. van Eijck and A. Visser, eds., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, A., 1995, “Dynamic discourse denotations,” Lecture Notes for the Department of Philosophy, University of Utrecht, and the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Amsterdam.

  • Visser, A. and Vermeulen, C., 1996, “Dynamic bracketing and discourse representation,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37, 321–365.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, A. Contexts in Dynamic Predicate Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 21–52 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008206916207

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008206916207

Navigation