Skip to content
Open Access Published by De Gruyter March 21, 2009

Two Dogmas of Rorty's Pragmatism

  • Timo Vuorio
From the journal Human Affairs

Two Dogmas of Rorty's Pragmatism

Here I discuss two controversial distinctions that have an essential role in Rorty's pragmatism: the distinction between descriptive and normative discourses, and the distinction between the private and public dimensions of human life. Neither of them is Rorty's novelty, but the way he stresses them is unique. The first is a central presupposition of his Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), while the other is the argumentative base of Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (1989). I will argue that the distinctions provide metaphilosophical tools for Rorty's pragmatism, and that our stance towards the latter depends on the plausibility of them.



References

Conway, D. Irony, State and Utopia. In M. Festenstein, S. Thompson (Eds.). Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Festenstein, M., Thompson, S. (Eds.). Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Haack, S. Vulgar Pragmatism: An Unedifying Prospect. In H. Saatkamp (Ed.). Rorty and Pragmatism. Nashville and London: Vanderbilt University Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Transl. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Horton, K. Irony and Commitment: An Irreconcilable Dualism of Modernity. In M. Festenstein, S. Thompson (Eds.). Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

McDowell. J. Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. Naturalizing the Transcendental: a Pragmatic View. Amherst (NY): Prometheus/Humanity Books, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, H. Realism and Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, V.O. From A Logical Point of View, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.Search in Google Scholar

Ramberg, B.T. Richard Rorty. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rorty/>, 2007. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rorty/Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Objectivity, Relativity, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Truth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Philosophy and Social Hope. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Responses. In M. Festenstein, S. Thompson (Eds.). Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Philosophy as Cultural Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. Science, Perception and Reality. New York: The Humanities Press, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

Shusterman, R. Reason and Aesthetics between Modernity and Postmodernity: Habermas and Rorty. In M. Festenstein, S. Thompson (Eds.). Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Tartaglia, J. Rorty and the Mirror of Nature. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Vuorio, T. Making Rorty Explicit: The Argument of ‘Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature’. Tampere: University of Tampere Press, to be published in 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2009-03-21
Published in Print: 2009-06-01

© 2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

This content is open access.

Downloaded on 26.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/v10023-009-0024-x/html
Scroll to top button