Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of CSR and Ethical Practices on Sustainable Competitive Performance: A Case of Emerging Markets from Stakeholder Theory Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An extensive work has been done on corporate social responsibly practices (CSRPs) that mainly emphasized the larger firms within developed nations. Nonetheless, still work is needed to observe the importance of CSRPs’ and ethical cultural practices (ECL) in terms of sustainable competitive performance (SACP) that garnered far less attention by the existing literature. This study explores the impact of CSRPs on SACP with the mediating role of ECL from SMEs of two emerging nations, i.e., China and Pakistan based on stakeholders’ theory and practices. The results using SEM affirmed the positive linkages of CSRPs—environment responsibility (EnvR), community responsibility (ComuR), customers' responsibility (CustR), suppliers responsibility (SupR), employee responsibility (EmpR), and Govt. rules & regulations’ responsibility (GRulR)—on SACP. It found that CSRPs have positive relationships with ECL whereas ECL further positively correlated with SACP in the context of both countries. The findings revealed the positive mediating influence of ECL between CSRPs and SACP, respectively. This study furnishes insightful information for management on how firms may achieve sustainable performance by incorporating ethical cultural practices and corporate social responsibility practices as the strategic tools. The study reports numerous implications for management together with lines for future directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ağan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M. F., & Açıkgöz, A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1872–1881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkhoraif, A., Rashid, H., & Mclaughlin, P. (2019). Lean implementation in small and medium enterprises: Literature review. Operations Research Perspectives, 6, 100089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampofo, A., Mujtaba, B., Cavico, F., & Tindall, L. (2004). The relationship between organizational ethical culture and the ethical behavior of employees: A study of accounting and finance professionals in the insurance industry of United States. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 2, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, M., & Ali Shah, S. Z. (2020). Managerial networking and business model innovation: Empirical study of new ventures in an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32, 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrive, J. T., & Feng, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from BRICS nations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 920–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthorpe, S. (2010). Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry. Property Management., 28(1), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, R. J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18, 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C., Frost, G., & Jones, S. (2018). CSR disclosure and financial performance revisited: A cross-country analysis. Australian Journal of Management, 43, 517–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M. E., & Dolan, C. S. (2008). Stewards of virtue? The ethical dilemma of CSR in African agriculture. Development and Change, 39, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal., 20(2), 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1701–1719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, W. Y. (2012). Critical success factors for small and medium enterprises: Perceptions of entrepreneurs in urban Malaysia. Journal of Business and Policy Research, 7, 204–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPEC. (2006). Retrieved December 20, 2006, from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/95442/IPCS-Special-Report-30.pdf.

  • Cunningham, L. X., & Rowley, C. (2008). The development of Chinese small and medium enterprises and human resource management: A review. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46, 353–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 490–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bakker, F. G., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44, 283–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degong, M., Ullah, F., Khattak, M. S., & Anwar, M. (2018). Do International Capabilities and Resources Configure Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Performance? Research within Pakistani SMEs. Sustainability, 10, 4298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehning, B., & Stratopoulos, T. (2003). Determinants of a sustainable competitive advantage due to an IT-enabled strategy. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12, 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., Mo, X., & Liu, S. (2014). Comparison of the middle-aged and older users’ adoption of mobile health services in China. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83, 210–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60, 2835–2857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management, 14, 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. W. (2015). Convenience sampling, random sampling, and snowball sampling: How does sampling affect the validity of research? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109, 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, J. (2002). A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. International Business Review, 11, 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler, S., & Häder, S. (2016). Special challenges of sampling for comparative surveys. In The SAGE handbook of survey methodology (pp. 346–355). Los Angeles: Sage.

  • Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5, 233–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEM. (2012). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved November 15, 2016, from http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/information/49071.

  • Giné, X. (2011). Access to capital in rural Thailand: An estimated model of formal vs. informal credit. Journal of Development Economics, 96, 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, J., & Maícas, J. P. (2011). Do switching costs mediate the relationship between entry timing and performance? Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1251–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, C., & Krishnan, P. (2011). CSR compliance and disclosure in BRICS: An intra-and inter-country comparison. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Black (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5, 87–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanif, M. I., Hanif, M. S., Kamran, A., Khan, R., & Yunfei, S. (2016). Knowledge sharing and innovation performance affected by hr generic strategies: An empirical study of SMEs in China and Pakistan. IBT Journal Of Business Studies (JBS), 12, 272–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroon, U., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2016). The interplay of innovation, TQM practices and SMEs performance in Pakistan: Moderating effects of knowledge inertia and external environment. Economics and Law, 9, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroon Hafeez, M., Shariff, M., Noor, M., & Mad Lazim, H. (2012). Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, firm resources, SME branding and firm’s performance: Is innovation the missing link? American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., & Abreu, M. C. S. D. (2015). Stakeholder theory as an ethical approach to effective management: Applying the theory to multiple contexts. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 17, 858–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, M. U., Malik, M., & Iqbal, Z. (2018). SMEs’ intention towards the adoption of mobile marketing: a case of Pakistan. International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, 4, 400–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. D. (1990). Collective sanctions and compliance norms: A formal theory of group-mediated social control. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 366–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J. (2010). Cultural psychology. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Bacha, C., & Kaid, L. L. (2011). Political communication across the world: Methodological issues involved in international comparisons. In Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques (pp. 395–416). New York: Routledge.

  • Hooi, L. W. (2006). Implementing e-HRM: The readiness of small and medium sized manufacturing companies in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 12, 465–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, T. C. T. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq, F., Stevenson, M., & Zorzini, M. (2014). Social sustainability in developing country suppliers: An exploratory study in the ready made garments industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 34, 610–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, I., Si, S., Xie, X., & Wang, L. (2010). Comparative study on impact of internal and external CFFs on SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 23, 637–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Neville, B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 599–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management 5 in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminska, O., & Lynn, P. (2017). Survey-based cross-country comparisons where countries vary in sample design: Issues and solutions. Journal of Official Statistics, 33, 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. (2017). Google blocked in China by censors, unclear how long it will last. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from https://www.infoworld.com/article/2615782/google-blocked-in-china-by-censors-unclear-how-long-it-will-last.html.

  • Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 29, 923–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, S. (1999). Organizational ethical culture: Real or imagined? Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. Z., Yang, Q., & Waheed, A. (2019). Investment in intangible resources and capabilities spurs sustainable competitive advantage and firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knouse, S. B., & Giacalone, R. A. (1992). Ethical decision-making in business: Behavioral issues and concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotrlik, J., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligeti, G., & Oravecz, Á. (2009). CSR communication of corporate enterprises in Hungary. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liong, C.-Y., Hamid, S. H. A., & Ibrahim, I. M. (2016). Improving the performance of chili sauce manufacturing process using simulation approach. In AIP conference proceedings (p. 030026). Melville: AIP Publishing.

  • Lynn, L., & Lynn, E. (2007). System and method for SPO2 instability detection and quantification. Google Patents.

  • Madueno, J. H., Jorge, M. L., Conesa, I. M., & Martínez-Martínez, D. (2016). Relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitive performance in Spanish SMEs: Empirical evidence from a stakeholders’ perspective. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2002). Corporate social and environmental performance and their relation to financial performance and institutional ownership: empirical evidence on Canadian firms. Available at SSRN 305781.

  • Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Rosli, M., Kuswantoro, F., & Che Omar, A. (2012). Competitive strategies and firm performance: A comparative study of Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises. In International conference on business and economic research, 12–13 March 2012, Bandung, Indonesia.

  • Muttakin, M. B., & Khan, A. (2014). Determinants of corporate social disclosure: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Advances in Accounting, 30, 168–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyaga, G. N., & Whipple, J. M. (2011). Relationship quality and performance outcomes: Achieving a sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Business Logistics, 32, 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyuur, R. B., Ofori, D. F., & Amponsah, M. M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: A developing country perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 61, 551–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. C. (2000). Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: empirical evidence from UK companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 766–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, C.-W., & Yang, M.-L. (2014). The effect of corporate social performance on financial performance: The moderating effect of ownership concentration. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., Waterman, R. H., & Jones, I. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed, B., Arshed, N., Malik, Z. F., & Mahmood, M. T. (2018). Impact of corporate social responsibility on firm’s performance: evidence from non-financial sector of Pakistan. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8, 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35, 718–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Martínez-Cañas, R. (2014). Ethical culture, ethical intent, and organizational citizenship behavior: The moderating and mediating role of person–organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salem, M. A., Shawtari, F., Shamsudin, M. F., & Hussain, H. B. I. (2018). The consequences of integrating stakeholder engagement in sustainable development (environmental perspectives). Sustainable Development, 26, 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. S. A., & Khan, Z. (2019). Corporate social responsibility: A pathway to sustainable competitive advantage? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(1), 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Ur Rehman, S., Zafar, A. U., Ding, X., & Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on corporate sustainability with mediating role of CSR: Analysis from the Asian context. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63, 148–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 625–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skudiene, V., & Auruskeviciene, V. (2012). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to internal employee motivation. Baltic Journal of Management, 7, 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeda. (2019). Retrieved December 20, 2019, from http://www.smeda.org.

  • Smith, L. T. (2013). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Ross, B., & Neuberger, C. (2018). Social media analytics—Challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 156–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhail, K., Jamil, N., Oyebode, J., & Ajmal, M. A. (2011). Continuing bonds in bereaved Pakistani Muslims: Effects of culture and religion. Death Studies, 35, 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhardjanto, D., Fitriyana, F. R., Wedaswari, M., & Wahyuningtyas, A. A. (2017). Stakeholder and corporate social responsibility disclosure: A comparative study of Indonesia, India, and Pakistan. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z., Jai, K., & Zhao, L. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability of local community: A case study of the transnational project in China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Sustainability, 11, 6456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1991). The fanatics: A behavioural approach to political violence. Australia: Brassey’s Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. & Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3–23.

  • Trevino, L. K. (1990). A cultural perspective on changing and developing organizational ethics. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 195–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkel, S., Uzunoğlu, E., Kaplan, M. D., & Vural, B. A. (2016). A strategic approach to CSR communication: Examining the impact of brand familiarity on consumer responses. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29, 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Teijlingen, E. R., Rennie, A. M., Hundley, V., & Graham, W. (2001). The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venard, B., & Hanafi, M. (2008). Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 481–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. C., & Singhapakdi, A. (1993). Marketing norms: The influence of personal moral philosophies and organizational ethical culture. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1986). The study of social issues in management: A critical appraisal. California Management Review, 28, 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, A., & Yang, J. (2018). Effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure on firms’ sales performance: A perspective of stakeholder engagement and theory. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33, 885–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. L., Nielsen, A. E., & Valentini, C. (2017). CSR research in the apparel industry: A quantitative and qualitative review of existing literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24, 382–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K.-C. (2001). Chinese culture and leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Meter. (2020a). Retrieved November 11, 2020, from https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/china-population/.

  • World Meter. (2020b). Retrieved November 11, 2020, from https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/pakistan-population/.

  • Wu, L.-Z., Kwan, H. K., Yim, F.H.-K., Chiu, R. K., & He, X. (2015). CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 819–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 286–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, A. S., & Baasandorj, S. (2017). Exploring CSR and financial performance of full-service and low-cost air carriers. Finance Research Letters, 23, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, Q., Hassan, H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). The role of a manager’s intangible capabilities in resource acquisition and sustainable competitive performance. Sustainability, 11, 527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Cao, M., Zhang, F., Liu, J., & Li, X. (2020). Effects of corporate social responsibility on customer satisfaction and organizational attractiveness: A signaling perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29, 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.-B. (2003). American civilization portrayed in ancient Confucianism. New York: Algora Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Sun, L.-Y., & Leung, A. S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: The role of ethical leadership. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31, 925–947.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are enormously grateful to the research funding support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (#71572115); Major Program of Social Science Foundation of Guangdong (#2016WZDXM005); Guangdong 13th-Five-Year-Plan Philosophical and Social Science Fund (#GD20CGL28); Natural Science Foundation of SZU (#836).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingyu Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the research committee of Shenzhen University (2018) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waheed, A., Zhang, Q. Effect of CSR and Ethical Practices on Sustainable Competitive Performance: A Case of Emerging Markets from Stakeholder Theory Perspective. J Bus Ethics 175, 837–855 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04679-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04679-y

Keywords

Navigation