Abstract
Perhaps the greatest challenge to an existential phenomenological account of perception is that posed by the argument from illusions. Recent developments in research on the behaviour of subjects suffering from illusions together with some seminal ideas found in Merleau-Ponty's writings enable us to develop and corroborate an account of the phenomenon of illusions, one, which unlike the empiricist account, does not undermine our conviction that in perception we “reach the things themselves”. The traditional argument from illusions derives its force from an uncritical assumption that the process of experience takes place in time conceived as an infinite series of distinct moments. Once this assumption has been bracketed we are able to recognise the paradoxical truth that in the disillusion something can become that which it has always been and can cease to be that which it has never been. Furthermore, through a reflection on our experience of others overcoming their illusions, and on psychological evidence, we are able to show that there is nothing to suggest that this description of the disillusion is a description of a private or subjective event.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dillon, M.C. (1988) Merleau-Ponty's Ontology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Gopnik, A. and Slaughter, V. (1991). Young Children's Understanding of Changes in their Mental States. Child Development 62: 98-110.
Hasher, L. Attig, M.S. and Alba, J.W. (1981). I Knew It All Along: Or, Did I?. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 20: 86-96.
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. D. Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Kellman, P.J. and Spelke, E.S. (1983). Perception of Partly Occluded Objects in Infancy. Cognitive Psychology 15: 483-524.
Kellman, P.J., Gleitman, H. and Spelke, E.S. (1987). Object and Observer Motion in the Perception of Objects by Infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13(4): 586-593.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1967). The Structure of Behaviour. Trans. A.L. Fisher. Boston: Beacon Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisibile. Trans. A. Lingis. Evanston, IL: North-Western University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Trans. E.G. Ballard and L.E. Embrie. Evanston IL: North-Western University Press.
Russell, B. (1978). The Analysis of Mind. New York: Humanities Press.
Zaner, R. (1967). The Problem of Embodiment. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wait, E.C. Dissipating Illusions. Human Studies 20, 221–242 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005376602167
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005376602167