Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisms and Organization

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organisms are organized both internally and externally. The centrality of the organism in examination of the hierarchy of biological organization and the kinds of “emergent properties” that develop from study of organization at one level relative to other levels are my themes. That centrality has not often been implicit in discussion of unifying concepts, even evolution. Few general or unifying principles integrate information derived from various levels of biological organization. However, as the genetic toolbox and other new techniques are now facilitating broader views of organisms and their internal and external interactions, and their evolution, some fundamental perspectives are emerging for many kinds of studies of biology. In particular, more hierarchical approaches are gaining favor in several areas of biology. Such approaches virtually demand the integration of data and theory from different levels of study. They require explicit delineations of methodology and clear definition of terms so that communication per se among scientists can become more integrative. In so doing, a hierarchy of theory will develop that demands ever further integration, potentially leading to unifying concepts and a general theory for biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen AP, Gillooly JF, Brown JH (2005) Linking the global carbon cycle to individual metabolism. Functional Ecology 19: 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (2005) The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1971) The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. Glasgow, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Arnold SJ (1983) Morphology, performance and fitness. American Zoologist 223: 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur W (1997) The Origin of Animal Body Plans: A Study in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bock JB, Matern HT, Peden AA, Scheller RH (2001) A genomic perspective on membrane compartment organization. Nature 409: 839–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker JA (2000) Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. American Zoologist 40: 770–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner JT (1988) The Evolution of Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks DR, Wiley EO (1986) Evolution as Entropy: Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke BS, Mittenthal JE (1992) Modularity and reliability in the organization of organisms. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 54: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn MJ, Tickle C (1999) Developmental basis of limblessness and axial patterning in snakes. Nature 399: 474–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson B, Jacobs MW, Swalla BJ (2003) The individual as a module: Solitary-to-colonial transitions in metazoan evolution and development. In: Modularity in Development and Evolution (Schlosser G, Wagner GP, eds), 443–465. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGuzman CG, Kelso JAS (1992) The flexible dynamics of biological coordination: Living in the niche between order and disorder. In: Principles of Organization in Organisms (Mittenthal JE, Baskin JB, eds), 11–34. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass GL, Bolker JA (2003) Modularity. In: Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology (Hall BK, Olson WM, eds), 260–267. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Bolker JA (2001a) Homologies of process and modular elements of embryonic construction. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular Development and Evolution) 291: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Bolker JA (2001b) Homologies of process and modular elements of embryonic construction. In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), 437–456. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1989) Evolution and the generative order. In: Theoretical Biology: Epigenetic and Evolutionary Order from Complex Systems (Goodwin BC, Saunders P, eds), 89–100. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1980) Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1998) Gulliver’s further travels: The necessity and difficulty of a hierarchical theory of selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353: 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant BR, Grant PR (1989) Natural selection in a population of Darwin’s finches. American Naturalist 133: 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK (2003) The emergence of form: The shape of things to come. Developmental Dynamics 228: 292–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK, Pearson RD, Mueller G, eds (2003) Environment, Development, and Evolution: Toward a Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanken J, Carl TF, Richardson MK, Olsson L, Schlosser G, Osabutey CK, Klymkowsky MW (2001) Limb development in a “nonmodel” vertebrate, the direct-developing frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular Development and Evolution) 291: 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaasma MJ, Bayraktar HH, Niebur GL, Keaveny TM (2002) Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in tissue modulus for trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 35: 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1992) The sciences of complexity and “origins of order.” In: Principles of Organization in Organisms (Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB, eds), 303–319. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaveny TM, Wong EK, Daugherty SM, et al. (2004) Role ofarchitecture and collagen cross-linking on trabecular bone mechanical properties. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 19: S356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehl MAR (1996) When does morphology matter? Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 27: 501–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korn RW (2002) Biological hierarchies, their birth, death and evolution by natural selection. Biology and Philosophy 17: 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung C (2005) A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation. Nature 436: 647–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauder GV (1981) Form and function: Structural analysis in evolutionary morphology. Paleobiology 7: 430–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder GV (1982) Introduction. In: Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology (Reissue of E. S. Russell, 1916, xi–xlii). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder GV, Liem KF (1989) The role of historical factors in the evolution of complex organismal functions. In: Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates (Wake DB, Roth G, eds), 63–78. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R (1992) Complexity: Life on the Edge of Chaos. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (2000) The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E, Provine WB, eds (1980) The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW (2000) Functional complexity in organisms: Parts as proxies. Biology and Philosophy 15: 641–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW, Venit EP (2001) What is a part? In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), 261–286. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minelli A (2003) The Development of Animal Form: Ontogeny, Morphology, and Evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mittenthal JE (1989) Physical aspects of the organization of development. In: Complex Systems (Stein D, ed), 225–274. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB (1992) General conclusions about the principles and theory of organization in organisms. In: Principles of Organization in Organisms (Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB, eds), 385–393. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB, Reinke RE (1992) Exploring the role of finiteness in the emergence of structure. In: Principles of Organization in Organisms (Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB, eds), 337–381. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB (2003) Homology: The evolution of morphological organization. In: Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology (Müller GB, Newman SA, eds), 51–69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Newman SA (2003) Origination of organismal form: The forgotten cause in evolutionary theory. In: Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology (Müller GB, Newman SA, eds), 3–10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy LM, Williams TA (2001) Comparative limb development as a tool for understanding the evolutionary diversification of limbs in arthropods: Challenging the modularity paradigm. In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), 457–490. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson TR (1992) Biological organization and adaptation: Fractal structure and scaling similarities. In: Principles of Organization in Organisms (Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB, eds), 35–61. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (1992) Generic physical mechanisms of morphogenesis and pattern formation as determinants in the evolution of multicellular organization. In: Principles of Organization in Organisms (Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB, eds), 241–267. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (2003) From physics to development: The evolution of morphogenetic mechanisms. In: Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology (Müller GB, Newman SA, eds), 221–239. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson EC, Miller RL (1958) Morphological Integration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostling A (2005) Neutral theory tested by birds. Nature 436: 635–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattee HH (1969) Physical conditions for primitive functional hierarchies. In: Hierarchical Structures (Whyte LL, Wilson AG, Wilson D, eds), 161–171. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson B, Tuomi J (1995) Hierarchical selection and fitness in modular and clonal organisms. Oikos 73: 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasskin-Gutman D (2003) Boundary constraints for the emergence of form. In: Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology (Müller GB, Newman SA, eds), 305–332. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup DM (1966) Geometric analysis of shell coiling: General problems. Journal of Paleontology 40: 1178–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup DM (1968) Theoretical morphology of echinoid growth. Journal of Paleontology 42: 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup DM, Michelson A (1965) Theoretical morphology of the coiled shell. Science 147: 1294–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi A-L (2002) Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic pathways. Science 297: 1551–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl R (1976) Order in Living Organisms (Jefferies RPS, trans.). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe SN (1985) Evolving Hierarchical Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez JA, Lasker HR (2003) Patterns of morphological integration in marine modular organisms: Supra-module organization in branching octocoral colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 270: 2039–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubin NH, Davis MC (2004) Modularity in the evolution of vertebrate appendages. In: Modularity in Development and Evolution (Schlosser G, Wagner GP, eds), 429–440. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis VB (1996) Unifying Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork DG (1992) Preadaptation and principles of organization in organisms. In: Principles of Organization in Organisms (Mittenthal JE, Baskin AB, eds), 205–224. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1968) General Systems Theory. New York: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP, Laubichler MD (2001) Character identification: The role of the organism. In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), 143–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake DB, Larson A (1987) Multidimensional analysis of an evolving lineage. Science 238: 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake DB, Roth G (1989) The linkage between ontogeny and phylogeny in the evolution of complex systems. In: Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates (Wake DB, Roth G, eds), 361–377. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake DB, Roth G, Wake MH (1983) On the problem of stasis in organismal evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 101: 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake MH (1990) The evolution of integration of biological systems: An evolutionary perspective through studies on cells, tissues, and organs. American Zoologist 30: 897–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake MH (1992) Morphology, the study of form and function, in modern evolutionary biology. In: Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology (Futuyma D, Antonovics J, eds), 289–346. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake MH (2001) Bodies and body plans: How they came to be. In: A New Century of Biology (Kress WJ, Barrett G, eds), 28–52. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake MH (2003) Reproductive modes, ontogenies, and the evolution of body form. Animal Biology 53: 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss P (1971) The basic concept of hierarchical systems. In: Hierarchically Organized Systems in Theory and Practice (Weiss P, ed), 1–43. New York: Hafner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther RG (2001) Varieties ofmodules: Kinds, levels, origins, and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular Development and Evolution) 291: 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winther RG (2006) Parts and theories in compositional biology. Biology and Philosophy 21: 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisheu IC (1998) How organisms partition habitats: Community organizations with identical patterns. Oikos 83: 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton JT (1994) Putting the pieces together: Testing the independence of interactions among organisms. Ecology 75: 1544–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick M (2001) Wholes and parts in general systems methodology. In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), 239–258. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Marvalee H. Wake

Authors
  1. Marvalee H. Wake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marvalee H. Wake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wake, M.H. Organisms and Organization. Biol Theory 3, 213–223 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.3.213

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.3.213

Keywords

Search

Navigation