Skip to main content
Log in

On the Formal Arguments of the Akutobhayā

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • The Book of Kindred Sayings (Samyutta-Nikaya) (1992). Rhys Davids, C. A. F. and Woodward, F. H., trans. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Milinda's Questions (1963). Horner, I. B., trans. London: Luzac & Company, Ltd.

  • Ames, William (1993). ‘Bhāvaviveka's Prajñāpradīpa: A Translation of Chapter One: “Examination of Causal Conditions”, (Pratyāya) – Part One', Journal of Indian Philosophy 21(3), 209–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, William (1995). ‘Bhāvaviveka's Prajñāpradīpa: A Translation of Chapter Two: “Examination of the Traversed, The Untraversed, And That Which is Being Traversed”', Journal of Indian Philosophy 23, 295–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacker, Stephan (1984). Seven Works of Vasubandhu: The Buddhist Psychological Doctor. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocking, Brian (1995). Nāgārjuna in China: A Translation of the Middle Treatise. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, Lokesh (1990). Tibetan-Sanskrit Dictionary Based on a Close Comparative Study of Sanskrit Originals and Tibetan Translations of Several Texts. Kyoto: Rinsen Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, E. B. (1894). ‘The Buddha-kâritâ of Aśvaghosha', in Buddhist Mahâyâna Texts. New York: Dover Publications Inc, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Sarat Chandra (1995). A Tibetan-English Dictionary with Sanskrit Synonyms. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, E. (1958). ‘Die Erkenntnislehre Klassischen Sā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\)khya-Systems', Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd-und Ostasiens 2, 84–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, Pradeep (1992). Inference and Fallacies Discussed in Ancient Indian Logic (with special reference to Nyāya and Buddhism). Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Jeffrey (1983). Meditation on Emptiness. London: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Clair W. (1986). “Akutobhayā” and Early Indian Madhyamaka. Ph. D., University of Michigan.

  • Ichimura, Shohei (1980). ‘A Study of the Mādhyamika Method of Refutation, Especially of Its Affinity to that of Kathāvatthu', Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 3(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichimura, Shohei (1992). ‘Re-Examining the Period of Nāgārjuna: Western India, A. D. 50–150', Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 40(2), 1073–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichimura, Shohei (1995). ‘The Period of Nāgārjuna and the Fang-pien-hsin-lun (or Upāyahr. dāyaś āstra)', Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 43(2), 1033–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inada, Keneth K. (1993). Nāgārjuna: A Translation of this Mūlamadhyamakakārikā with an Introductory Essay (reprint ed.). Delhi: Sri Satguru Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, Takashi (1993). Prasa \(\dot n\) ga und Prasa \(\dot n\) ngaviparyāya bei Dharmakirti und Seinen Kommentatoren. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, Mahāmahopādhyaya Ganganath (1965). The Tattva Kaumudi: Vācaspati Miśra's Commentary on the Sā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\) khya-Kārikā. Poona Oriental Series, vol. 10. Poona: Oriental Book Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, Mahāmahopādhyaya Ganganath (1984). The Nyāya-Sū\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\) ras of Gau \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\) ama with the Bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) ya of Vā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)syāyana and the Vār \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\) ika of U \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d}\)yo\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)kara, translated into English With Notes from Vāchaspa \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)i Mishra's ‘Nyāya-Vārt \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)ika-\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{T}\)ā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)paryaīkā', Udayana's ‘Parishu \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d}\)hi’ and Raghuttama's Bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) yachandra. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, J. W. (1978). ‘Textcritical Notes on the Prasannapadā', IndoIranian Journal 20(1–4), 25–60 (#s. 1/2) and 217–252 (#s 3/4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katre, Sumitra M. (1987). A \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)ādhyāyīof Pā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)ini. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, Arnold (1939–1940). ‘The Two-Membered Syllogism', Rocznik Orientalistyczny 15, 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Gerald (ed.). (1987). Sā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\)khya: A Dualist Tradition in Indian Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Donald (1987). A Study of Svātantrika. Ithica, New York: Snow Lion Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Jaques (1959). Candrakīrti PrasannapadāMadhyamakavr. tti: Douze chapitres traduits du sanscrit et du tibétain, accompagnés d'une introduction, de notes et d'une édition critique de la version tibétaine. Paris: Libraire DAmérique et D'Orient.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monier-Williams, S. M. (1899). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty, K. Satchidananda (1971). Nāgārjuna. Delhi: National Book Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetke, Claus (1996). ‘Ancient Indian Logic as a Theory of Non-Monotonic Reasoning', Journal of Indian Philosophy 24, 447–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Stephen H. (1995). Classical Indian Metaphysics: Refutations of Realism and the Emergence of “New Logic”. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Karl H. (ed.). (1977). Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: The Tradition of Nyāya-Vai śe \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) ika up to Ga \(\dot n\)geśa Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poussin, Louis de la Valée (1903–1913). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna avec la PrasannapadāCommentarie de Candrakīrti. Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, David Seyfort (1977). ‘The Uses of the Four Positions of the Catu\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ko\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)i and the Problem of the Description of Reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism', Journal of Indian Philosophy 5, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, David Seyfort (1981). The Literature of the Madhamaka School of Philosophy in India. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santina, Peter Della (1986). Madhyamaka Schools in India: A Study of the Madhyamaka Philosophy and the Division of the System into the Prāsa \(\dot n\) gika and Svātantrika Schools. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Priyavat (1981). Caraka Sa \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\) hitā: Agniveśa's Treatise Refined and Annotated by Caraka and Redacted by D \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)dhabāla (text with English translation), Priyavrat Sharma, ed. and trans. Banaras: Chaukhambha Orientalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staal, J. F. (1962). ‘Negation and the Law of Contradiction in Indian Thought: a Comparative Study', Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies University of London 25, 52–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachikawa, Musashi (1974). ‘A Study of Buddhapālita's Mūlamadhyamakav\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)-tti', Nagoya Daigaku Bungakubu KenkyūRonshū 63 (Dec. 9), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tailanga, Mahamahopadhyaya Gangadhara Sastri (1984). The Nyāyasūtras with Vātsyāyana's Bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ya and Extracts from the Nyāyavārttika and the Tatparyatīka (2nd edn.). Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taranatha Nyaya-Tarkatirtha and Amarendramohan Tarkatirtha (1985). Nyāyadarśanam: With Vātsyāyana's Bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ya, Uddyotkara's Vārttika, Vācaspati Miśra's Tātparya \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)īkā & Viśvanaātha's V \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)tti (2nd edn.). New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Private Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallesser, Max (1911). Die Buddhistische Philosophie in iherer geschichtlichen Entwickling: Zweiter Teil – Die mittlere Lehre des Nāgārjuna. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayman, Alex (1958). ‘The Rules of Debate According to Asa\(\dot n\)ga', Journal of the American Oriental Society 78, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, Dwight W. (1891). A Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana (2nd edn.). Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walser, J. On the Formal Arguments of the Akutobhayā. Journal of Indian Philosophy 26, 189–232 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004325909518

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004325909518

Keywords

Navigation