Abstract
In this paper it is shown is that although poisoning the well has generally been treated as a species of ad hominem fallacy, when you try to analyze the fallacy using ad hominem schemes, even by supplementing with related schemes like argument from position to know, the analysis ultimately fails. The main argument of the paper is taken up with proving this negative claim by applying these schemes to examples of arguments associated with the fallacy of poisoning the well. Although there is a positive finding in this quest, in that poisoning the well is shown to be based on and associated with these forms of argument in interesting ways, the paper in the end is led to the conclusion that the fallacy is irreducibly dialectical. Poisoning the well is thus analyzed as a tactic to silence an opponent violating her right to put forward arguments on an issue both parties have agreed to discuss at the confrontation stage of a critical discussion. It is concluded that it is a special form of strategic attack used by one party in the argumentation stage of a critical discussion to improperly shut down the capability of the other party for putting forward arguments of the kind needed to properly move the discussion forward.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Copi I. M., Cohen C. (1998) Introduction to Logic. 10th ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall
Correspondence (no author given): Mr. Kingsley and Dr. Newman – A Correspondence on the Question Whether Dr. Newman Teaches that Truth is no Virtue, London, Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts and Green, 1864. Available at: http://www.newmanreader.org/works/apologia/correspondence.html
Damer E. D. (1980) Attacking Faulty Reasoning. Belmont, Wadsworth
Davis W. A. (1986) An Introduction to Logic. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall
Garver E. (1994) Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Hurley P. J. (2003) A Concise Introduction to Logic. 8th ed. Belmont, California, Wadsworth
Johnstone H. W. Jr. (1959) Philosophy and Argument. University Park, Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University Press
Johnstone H. W. Jr. (1978) Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument. University Park, Pennsylvania, The Dialogue Press of Man and World
Johnstone H. W. Jr. (1981) Toward an Ethics of Rhetoric. Communication 6:305–314
Krabbe E. C. W., Walton D. N. (1993) It’s All Very Well for you to Talk: Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks. Informal Logic 15:79–91
Layman S. C.. (2000) The Power of Logic. Mountain View California, Mayfield Publishing Co.
Moore B. N., Parker R. (2001) Critical Thinking. 6th ed., Mountain View, California, Mayfield Publishing Co
Newman J. H. (1864) Apologia Pro Vita Sua. London, Longman, Green
Reed, C. and G. Rowe: ‚Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML’, Technical Report, Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee, 2002. Available at: http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria/
van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R. (1984) Speech Acts in Communicative Discussions. Dordrecht, Foris
van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R. (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale, N. J., Erlbaum
van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R. (2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2002, ‚Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2002
Walton D. (1987) Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Walton D. (1995) A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa and London
Walton D. (1998) Ad Hominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press
Walton D. (2002) Legal Argumentation and Evidence. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
Walton, D. and Krabbe, E.C.W.: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue, State University of New York Press, Albany
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walton, D.N. Poisoning the Well . Argumentation 20, 273–307 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9013-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9013-z