Skip to main content
Log in

Relatedness in intensional action chains

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • St. Anselm of Canterbury: 1969, Lambeth Manuscript 59, in F. S. Schmitt and R. W. fnSouthern (eds.), Memorials of St. Anselm (Oxford University Press, London), pp. 333–354 (written before 1109).

  • Åqvist, Lennart: 1974, ‘A new approach to the logical theory of actions and causality’, in Sören Stenlund (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantics (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Annette: 1971, ‘The search for basic actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly 8, pp. 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jonathan: 1973, ‘Shooting, killing and dying’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11, pp. 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, George: 1973, ‘Temporally symmetric causal relations in Minkowski space-time’, in Patrick Suppes (ed.), Space, Time and Geometry (Reidel Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, Lars: 1966, The Alternatives and Consequences of Actions (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Myles: 1971, ‘The language of not doing’, American Philosophical Quarterly 8, pp. 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1964, ‘The descriptive element in the concept of action’, Journal of Philosophy 61, pp. 613–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1966, ‘Freedom and action’, in Keith Lehrer (ed.), Freedom and Determinism (Random House, New York), pp. 11–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1969, ‘Some puzzles about agency’, in Karel Lambert (ed.), The Logical Way of Doing Things (Yale University Press, New Haven and London), pp. 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1970, ‘Events and propositions’, Noûs 4, pp. 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1971, ‘States of affairs again’, Noûs 5, pp. 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1971, ‘On the logic of intentional action’, in Robert Binkley et al. (eds.), Agent, Action, and Reason (University of Toronto Press, Toronto and Buffalo), pp. 38–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1976, ‘The agent as cause’, in Myles Brand and Douglas Walton (eds.), Action Theory (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur: 1973, Analytical Philosophy of Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Arcy, Eric: 1963, Human Acts (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1967, ‘The logical form of action sentences’, in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh), pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1970, ‘Events as particulars’, Noûs 4, pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1971, ‘Agency’, in Robert Binkley, Richard Bronaugh and Ausonio Marras (eds.), Agent, Action, and Reason (University of Toronto Press, Toronto and Buffalo), pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel: 1965, ‘Action and responsibility’, in Max Black (ed.), Philosophy in America (Cornell University Press, Ithaca).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, Frederic B.: 1963, ‘A logical analysis of some value concepts’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 28, pp. 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin I.: 1970, A Theory of Human Action (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin I.: 1971, ‘The individuation of action’, Journal of Philosophy 68, pp. 761–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, A. M.: 1969, Causation in the Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Desmond P.: 1953, ‘St. Anselm on the varieties of doing’, Theoria 19, pp. 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Desmond P.: 1967, The Logic of St. Anselm (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M.J.: 1968, An Introduction to Modal Logic (Methuen, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, Stig: 1972, ‘Law and logic’, Theoria 38, pp. 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jaegwon: 1974, ‘Noncausal connections’, Noûs 8, pp. 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Gerald J.: 1976, ‘Tom, Dick, and Harry, and all the King's Men’. American Philosophical Quarterly 13, pp. 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pörn, Ingmar: 1971, The Logic of Power (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pörn, Ingmar: 1974, ‘Some basic concepts of action’, in Sören Stenlund (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantics (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans: 1958, The Philosophy of Space and Time (Dover, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans: 1971, The Direction of Time (University of California Press Berkeley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalberg, Irving: 1971, ‘Singling out actions, their properties and components’, Journal of Philosophy 68, pp. 781–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalberg, Irving: 1972, Enigmas of Agency (Allen & Unwin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalberg, Irving: 1976, ‘How does agent causality work?’, in Myles Brand and Douglas Walton (eds.), Action Theory (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Judith Jarvis: 1971, ‘The time of a killing’, Journal of Philosophy 68, pp. 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Judith Jarvis: 1971a, ‘Individuating actions’, Journal of Philosophy 68, pp. 774–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1970, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1975, ‘Modal logic and agency’, Logique et Analyse 69–70, pp. 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1976, ‘Logical form and agency’, Philosophical Studies 29, pp. 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1976a, ‘Time and modality in the Can of opportunity’, in Myles Brand and Douglas Walton (eds.), Action Theory (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1977, ‘Critical study of some recent action theory’, Philosophia to appear.

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1976h, ‘St.Anselm and the logical syntax of agency’, Franciscan Studies 36, pp. 298–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1978, On Defining Death (McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal and Kingston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, John and Walton, Douglas: 1977, ‘Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc’, Review of Metaphysics 30, pp. 569–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1963, Norm and Action (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1965, And Next, Acta Philosophica Fennica, Fasc. XVIII (North-Holland, Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1968, An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action, Acta Philosophica Fenica, Fasc. XXI (North-Holland Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1969, Time, Change and Contradiction (Cambridge University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1971, Explanation and Understanding (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1974, Causality and Determinism (Columbia University Press, New York and London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research on which this paper is based was carried out during a year's study leave at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, partly supported by Canada Council Leave Fellowship 750356. I would like to thank, in addition to participants of the Logic Seminar at VUW, Lynn Batten, Don Grant, and Peter Miller, who made some valuable comments when this material was read for the Math-Philosophy Seminar at the University of Winnipeg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walton, D.N. Relatedness in intensional action chains. Philosophical Studies 36, 175–223 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354268

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354268

Keywords

Navigation