Abstract
This paper looks into the known evidence on the origins of the type of argument called the circumstantial ad hominemargument in modern logic textbooks, and introduces some new evidence. This new evidence comes primarily from recent historical work by Jaap Mansfeld and Jonathan Barnes citing many cases where philosophers in the ancient world were attacked on the grounds that their personal actions failed to be consistent with their philosophical teachings. On the total body of evidence, two hypotheses about the roots of the circumstantial ad hominem are considered. One is that it came from Aristotle through Locke. The other is that it may have had separate roots in these ancient philosophical writings that criticized philosophers for not practicing what they preached.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aristotle: 1939, Topica, trans. E. S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Aristotle: 1928, On Sophistical Refutations, trans. E. S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Barnes, J.: 1997, Logic and the Imperial Stoa, Brill, Leiden.
Barth, E. M. and J. L. Martens: 1977, 'Argumentum Ad Hominem: From Chaos to Formal Dialectic', Logique at Analyse 77-78, 76–96.
Brinton, A.: 1985, 'A Rhetorical View of the Ad Hominem', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63, 50–63.
Brinton, A.: 1995, 'The Ad Hominem', in Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Penn State Press, University Park, PA, pp. 213–222.
Byerly, H. C.: 1973, A Primer of Logic, Harper and Row, New York.
Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1993, 'The History of the Argumentum ad Hominem Since the Seventeenth Century', in Erik C. W. Krabbe, Renee Jose Dalitz and Pier A Smit (eds.), Empirical Logic and Public Debate, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 49–68.
Finocchiaro, M.: 1980, Galileo and the Art of Reasoning, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Gellius, A.: 1960, The Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Grant, R. W.: 1997, Hypocrisy and Integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the Ethics of Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
Hunt, L. H.: 1990. Character and Chaos: The Moral and Political Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Hurley, P. J.: 2000, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 7th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
Johnson, P.: 1988, Intellectuals, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
Johnstone, H. W. Jr.: 1978, Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument, The Dialogue Press of Man and World, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Krabbe, E. C. W. and D. N. Walton: 1993, 'It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks', Informal Logic 15, 79–91.
Locke, J.: 1961, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), ed. John Yolton, Dent, London.
Mansfeld, J.: 1994, Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled Before the Study of An Author, or a Text, Brill, Leiden.
Mathews, N.: 1996, Francis Bacon: The History of a Character Assassination, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Nuchelmans, G.: 1993, 'On the Fourfold Root of the Argumentum Ad Hominem', in Erik C. W. Krabbe, Renee Jose Dalitz and Pier A. Smit (eds.), Empirical Logic and Public Debate, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 37–47.
Seneca, L.: 1917, Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales (in three volumes), Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Seneca, L.: 1932, De Vita Beata (On the Happy Life), Seneca: Moral Essays II, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 98–179.
Walton, D.: 1998, Ad Hominem Arguments, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Walton, D. N. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Watts, I.: 1725, Logick, John Clark and Richard Hett, London.
Whately, R.: 1848, Elements of Logic (1826), 9th ed., Longmans, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walton, D.N. Searching for the Roots of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem. Argumentation 15, 207–221 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011120100277
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011120100277