Abstract
As one indispensable part of signs, blank-sign, also called zero sign or the void of sign, has not been given enough or due attention in semiotics. What is worse is that researchers have not reached agreement on some basic issues in blank-signs, such as the nature of the absence of the signifier, the criteria for identifying blank-signs, the scope of the blank-sign research, etc. These questions are of vital importance for more comprehensive exploration of the blank-sign issue. After analyzing three types of blank-signs, the paper concludes that: (1) In blank-signs, both signifier and signified must be present. The so-called “absent signifier” actually means the absence of the representation of the signifier, and the “absent signified” suggests some unspecified meanings; (2) Being a blank-sign is a matter of degree, with the typical blank-signs having a closed borderline, and the atypical ones a partial borderline; (3) Neighboring substantial context and general context (intentions of the sign-maker) are crucial for determining the status of a blank-sign.
Funding source: 2020 Jiangsu Social Science Application Projects for the Category of Foreign Languages
Award Identifier / Grant number: 20SWA-01
-
Research funding: This work was supported by 2020 Jiangsu Social Science Application Projects for the Category of Foreign Languages (Grant number 20SWA-01).
References
Barthes, Roland. 1988. The basics of semiotics: A selection of constructionist literary theories [in Chinese], Youzheng, Li (trans.). Beijing: SDX.Search in Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack. 1994. Constituting silence: Life in the world of total meaning. Semiotica 98(1/2). 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1994.98.1-2.73.Search in Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas J. 1973. Communicative silences: Forms and functions. Journal of Communication 23. 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1973.tb00929.x.Search in Google Scholar
Cantor, Robert M. 2016. Zero sign duality in visual semiotics. Semiotica 210(1/4). 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0051.Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The basics, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar
Cobley, Paul. 2001. Semiotics and linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ephratt, Michal. 2008. The functions of silence. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1909–1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.009.Search in Google Scholar
Hawkings, Peter R. 1971. The syntactic location of hesitation pauses. Language and Speech 14. 277–288.10.1177/002383097101400308Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1984. Zero sign. In Linda R. Waugh & Morris Halle (eds.), Russian and Slavic grammar, 1–14. New York: Mouton.10.1515/9783110822885Search in Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1950. Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss. In Marcel Mauss (eds.), Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Youzeng. 2009. Cognitive semantic activation and the aesthetics of linguistic blank-leaving [in Chinese]. Journal of Xian International Studies University 4. 10–14.Search in Google Scholar
Melchuk, Igor. 1999. Zero sign in morphology. In Presented at the third international Tbilisi symposium on language, logic and computation. http://www.illc.uva.nl/Tbilisi/Batumi1999 (accessed 7 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Nie, Lijun & Bing Li. 2014. The theory of zero sign: A new perspective in the study of minority nationalities [in Chinese]. Thinking 5. 17–22.Search in Google Scholar
Poyatos, Fernando. 2002. Nonverbal communication across disciplines. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.ncad3Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 1985. Contributions of signs. Lanham, MD: University of America.Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 2001. Signs: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Su, Shaobo. 2000. On the pauses in speaking and reading [in Chinese]. Journal of Chongqing University of Education 1. 54–58.Search in Google Scholar
Tanaka-Ishii, Kumiko. 2017. Void of sign. Semiotica 218(1/4). 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0143.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Dong & Bing Li. 2013. Roland Barthes’ zero sign and “border-crossing” ethics [in Chinese]. The Northern Forum 6. 138–141.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Xijie. 1989. Emotion, reason and law in speech [in Chinese]. Changsha: Hunan University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Xijie. 2012. Hidden words and reconsideration of blank signs, and theorization of blank signs. Culture Communication 1. 51–57.Search in Google Scholar
Wei, Shilin. 2012. The theory of blank-sign [in Chinese]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar
Weitz, Shirley. 1974. Nonverbal communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1967. Philosophical investigations, 3rd edn., G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Zeng, Qingxiang. 2017. On blank-signs: Exchange of views with Professor Shilin Wei [in Chinese]. Cultural Studies and Literary Theory 1. 23–33.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, Yiheng. 2016. Semiotics: Principles and problems [in Chinese]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
