Abstract
“Thing” and “nothing” are metaphysical themes of thinking for major philosophers both in the West and in East Asia, such as Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi 老子. In light of a discussion of Heidegger’s understanding of thing-ing and no-thing and of his critical interpretation of Kant on the same issue, I shall in this essay reconstruct a Laozian theory of thing and nothing. My conclusion is that thing and nothing are not two “things,” as often assumed by an epistemological approach, but ontologically one thing cut by an absolute limit set up by human rationality which is contained either in our consciousness or in our languages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, Henry E. 2006. “Kant’s Transcendental Idealism.” In A Companion to Kant, edited by Graham Bird. Oxford: Blackwell.
Buchner, Hartmut, ed. 1989. Japan und Heidegger. Sigmaringen: Thorbecke.
Chan, Wing-Tsit, trans. and com. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chang, Chung-yuan. 1975. Tao: A New Way of Thinking—A Translation of the Tao Te Ching with an Introduction and Commentaries. New York: Harper and Row.
Heidegger, Martin. 1927. Sein und Zeit (GA 2). Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer.
____. 1962. Being and Time, trans. by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.
____. 1975. “The Thing.” In Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. by Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper and Row.
____. 1984. Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen (GA 41). Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer.
____. 1987. Einfuehrung in die Metaphysik (GA 40). Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer.
____. 1993a. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Basic Writings: Martin Heidegger, edited by David Farrell Krell. New York: HarperCollins Publisher.
____. 1993b. “On the Essence of Truth.” In Basic Writings: Martin Heidegger, edited by David Farrell Krell. New York: HarperCollins Publisher.
____. 1996. “Kants These ueber das Sein.” In Wegmarken (GA 9). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
____. 1997. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. by Richard Taft, 5th ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
____. 2000a. “Das Ding.” In Vortraege und Aufsaetze (GA 7). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
____. 2000b. “Bauen Wohnen Denken.” In Vortraege und Aufsaetze (GA 7). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
____. 2000c. Zu Hölderlin/Griechenlandreisen (GA 75). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
____. 2000d. “Die Einzigkeit des Dichters.” In Zu Hölderlin/Griechenlandreisen (GA 75). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Hsiao, Paul Shih-yi. 1987. “Heidegger and Our Translation of the Tao Te Ching.” In Heidegger and Asian Thought, edited by Graham Parkes. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Critique of Pure Reason (CPR), trans. by Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub.
Lau, D. C., trans. 1970. Mencius. London: Penguin Books.
Ma, Lin. 2008. Heidegger on East–West Dialogue: Anticipating the Event. New York: Routledge.
May, Reinhard. 1989. Ex oriente lux: Heideggers Werk Unter Ostasiatischem Einfluss. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Parkes, Graham, ed. 1987. Heidegger and Asian Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Petzet, Heinrich Wiegand. 1983. Auf einen Stern zugehen—Begegnungen und Gespräche mit Martin Heidegger, 1929–1976. Frankfurt: Societies.
Poeggeler, Otto. 1992. Neue Wege mit Heidegger. Freiburg: Muenchen.
Wang, Qingjie. 1997. “On Laozi’s Concept of Ziran.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24: 291–321.
____. 2003. “‘It-self-so-ing’ and ‘Other-ing’ in Laozi’s Concept of Zi Ran.” In Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy, edited by Mou Bo. Ashgate World Philosophy Series. Hants, UK: Ashgate (revised version of Wang 1997).
____. 2004. Heidegger and a Hermeneutical Interpretation of Confucianism and Daoism 解釋學、海德格爾與儒道今釋. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue Chubanshe 中國人民大學出版社.
____. 2005. “Tao and Being: Heidegger’s ‘Fourfold’ and Lao-Tzu’s Ziranist Conception of Being 道之為物: 海德格的 ‘四方域’ 物論與老子的自然物論.” Phenomenology and the Human Sciences 現象學與人文科學 2: 261–314.
Wohlfahrt, Guenter, and Mary Heitz. 2003. “Heidegger and Laozi: Wu (Nothing)—On Chapter 11 of the Daodejing.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30.1: 39–59.
Zhang, Xianglong 張祥龍. 1996. Heidegger’s Thinking and the Chinese Dao of Heaven 海德格爾思想與中國天道. Beijing 北京: Sanlian Shudian 三聯書店.
____. 1998. Heidegger 海德格爾傳. Shijiazhuang 石家莊: Hebei Renmin Chubanshe 河北人民出版社.
____. 2009. “The Coming Time ‘Between’ Being and Daoist Emptiness: An Analysis of Heidegger’s Article Inquiring into the Uniqueness of the Poet via the Lao Zi.” Philosophy East and West 59.1: 71–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q.J. Thing-ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi. Dao 15, 159–174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9485-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9485-y