Abstract
This essay assesses Tu Weiming’s notion of transcendence in terms both of its legitimacy as an interpretation of Confucianism and of its viability as an answer to modern challenges. An examination of Tu’s hermeneutical assumptions in his Zhongyong commentary leads to a discussion of his locating transcendence in the subjectivity of the junzi, the profound person. Calling the self-cultivation “self-knowledge,” Tu makes explicit the religious character of the xin, the basis of self-cultivation, and its transcendent character, because it is endowed from heaven. However, because the xin is irreducibly human, this transcendence is also immanentized. From the xin a fiduciary community is formed, hence the “covenantal” nature of Confucian religiousness. The essay ends with the question: Because Tu does not elaborate on cultivating a community’s intersubjectivity, does it make the realization of the transcendent xin a “deferred potentiality,” without mooring in the actual formation of human community?
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger and David Hall. 2001. Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Bultmann, Rudolf. 1960. “Is Exegesis without Presupposition Possible?” In his Faith and Existence. New York: Meridian Books.
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Elazar, Daniel. 1995. Covenant and Polity in Biblical Israel: Biblical Foundations and Jewish Expressions. Covenant Tradition in Politics 1. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. New York: Seabury.
______. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of Calififornia Press.
Kaufman, Gordon. 1972. God the Problem. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Kim, Chin-Tai. 1987. “Transcendence and Immanence.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 55: 537–49.
Ng, On-cho. 1999. “Negotiating the Boundary between Hermeneutics and Philosophy in Early Ch’ing Ch’eng-Chu Confucianism: Li Kuang-ti’s (1642–1718) Study of the Doctrine of the Means (Chung-yung) and Great Learning (Ta-hsueh).” In Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Hermeneutics. Ed. by Chow Kai-wing, Ng On-cho and John B. Henderson. Albany: SUNY.
______. 2001. Cheng-Zhu Confucianism in the Early Qing: Li Guangdi (1642–1718) and Qing Reading. Albany: SUNY.
Palmer, Richard E. 1969. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Pang, Pu. 1998. “Between Confucius and Mencius—The Guodian Strips in the History of Thought.” Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 5.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1977. “Toward a Hermeneutic of the Idea of Revelation.” Harvard Theological Review 70:1–37.
Rudolph, Kurt. 1983. Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Slingerland, Edward. 2002. “Review of Kai-wing Chow, On-cho Ng, and John B. Henderson, eds., Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Hermeneutics.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70: 190.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1961. Democracy in America. New York: Schoken Books.
Tu, Weiming. 1979. “The Unity of Knowing and Acting: From a Neo-Confucian Perspective.” In his Humanity and Self-Cultivation: Essays in Confucian Thought. Berkeley: Asian Humanities.
______. 1989. Centrality and Commonality: An Essay on Confucian Religiousness. Revised and enlarged. Albany: SUNY.
Wan, Sze-kar. 1995. “Allegorical Interpretation East and West: A Methodological Enquiry into Comparative Hermeneutics.” In Text and Experience. Ed. by D. Smith-Christopher. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.
______. 2002. “Christian Contributions to the Globalization of Confucianism (Beyond Maoism).” In God and Globalization Volume 3: Christ and the Dominions of Civilization. Ed. by M. Stackhouse . Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.
______. 2006. “Betwixt and Between: Towards a Hermeneutics of Hyphenation.” In Ways of Being, Ways of Reading: Asian-American Biblical Interpretation. Ed. by M. Foskett and J. K.-J. Kuan. St. Louis: Chalice.
Warnke, Georgia. 1987. Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
Weber, Max. 1968. The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. New York: Free Press.
______. 1992. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
Zhu, Xi. 1977. “Zhongyong.” In Collected Commentaries on the Four Books 四書集注. Taipei 臺北: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, Sk. The Viability of Confucian Transcendence: Grappling with Tu Weiming’s Interpretation of the Zhongyong . Dao 7, 407–421 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9089-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9089-2