Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying the eurosceptic

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Weiler, “Problems of Legitimacy in Post 1992 Europe”,Aussenwirtschaft 46 (1991), 411–37, at 427.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Derrida,The Other Heading: Reflections on Today's Europe, trans. P-A. Brault & M. Naas (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992). For a jurisprudential review of this thesis, see I. Ward, “In Search of a European Identity”,Modern Law Review 57 (1994), 315–29. “Capital” describes economic dominion, and “capitale” describes cultural dominion.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Delanty,Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Macmillan, 1995), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Milward,The European Rescue of the Nation-State (London: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Kastendiek, “Convergence or a Persistent Diversity of National Politics?”, inThe Politics of 1992: Beyond the Single European Market, ed. C. Crouch and D. Marquand (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Supra n.3 G. Delanty,Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Macmillan, 1995), 1–15, at chs. 2–3. For the same thesis, see also D. Heater,The Idea of European Unity (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1992), chs. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Kristeva,Nations Without Nationalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Supra n.7 J. Kristeva,Nations Without Nationalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 4, at 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heater,supra n.6 D. Heater,The Idea of European Unity (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1992), at 11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. In R. Paul, “Black and Third World Peoples' Citizenship and 1992”Critical Social Policy 11 (1992), 52–65, at 53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Delanty,supra n.3 G. Delanty,Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Macmillan, 1995), 1–15, at chs. 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a discussion of this general thesis, see M. Eksteins,The Rites of Spring (Toronto: Lester & Orpen Dennys, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See M. Heidegger,The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York: Harper, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Supra n.11 G. Delanty,Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Macmillan, 1995), 1–15, at 112–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Supra n.9 D. Heater,The Idea of European Unity (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1992), at 123.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Supra n.15 D. Heater,The Idea of European Unity (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1992), at 147.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Supra n.1 J. Weiler, “Problems of Legitimacy in Post 1992 Europe”,Aussenwirtschaft 46 (1991), 411–37, at 434–36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Supra n. 4 A. Milward,The European Rescue of the Nation-State (London: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Supra n.1 J. Weiler, “Problems of Legitimacy in Post 1992 Europe”,Aussenwirtschaft 46 (1991), 411–37, at 429–31.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Supra n.11 G. Delanty,Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Macmillan, 1995), 1–15, at 132.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Supra n.11 G. Delanty,Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Macmillan, 1995), 1–15, at 157–63.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See P. Close,Citizenship, Europe and Change (London: Macmillan, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Supra n.11 G. Delanty,Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Macmillan, 1995), 1–15, at 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See E. Wistrich,The United States of Europe (London: Routledge, 1994), 90–91 and 168.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Therborn,European Modernity and Beyond (London: Sage, 1995), 229–49.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Supra n.1 J. Weiler, “Problems of Legitimacy in Post 1992 Europe”,Aussenwirtschaft 46 (1991), 411–37, at 430.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The most recent substantive and influential attempt, by Joxerramon Bengoetxea, is a classic example of such an approach. See hisThe Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).

  28. The paradigmatic texts here are M. Capelletti, M. Seccombe and J. Weiler, eds.Integration Through Law (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1985). See also F. Mancini, “The Making of a Constitution for Europe”, inThe New European Community: Decisionmaking and Constitutional Change, ed. R. Keohane and S. Hoffmann (Boulder: Westview, 1991), 177–94.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See I. Ward, “The Limits of Comparativism: Lessons from EC-UK Integration”,Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2 (1995), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See A. Teasdale, “Subsidiarity in Post-Maastricht Europe”,Political Quarterly 64 (1993), 189–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. For a general critique, see D. Curtin, “The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces”,Common Market Law Review 30 (1993), 17–69.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See D. Phelan, “Right to Life of the Unborn v. Promotion of Trade in Services: The European Court of Justice and the Normative Shaping of the European Union”,Modern Law Review 55 (1992), 670–89.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See T. Frazer, “Competition Policy after 1992: The Next Step”,Modern Law Review 53 (1990), 609–11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. Snyder,New Directions in European Community Law (London: Weidenfeld, 1990), at 26.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seesupra n.1 J. Weiler, “Problems of Legitimacy in Post 1992 Europe”,Aussensirts chaft 46 (1991), 411–37, and “The Transformation of Europe”,Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 2405–83.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Allott, “The European Community is Not the True European Community”,Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 2485–88.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Supra n.36 P. Allott, “The European Community is Not the True European Community”,Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 2485–88, at 2498–99.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Hoffmann,The European Sisyphus: Essays on Europe 1964–1994 (Boulder: Westview, 1995), 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See M. Spencer,States of Injustice (London: Pluto, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  40. For a critique, see S. Holland,The European Imperative: Economic and Social Cohesion in the 1990s (London: Pinter, 1993), 170–73.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See A. Geddes, “Immigrant and Ethnic Minorities and the EU's ‘Democratic Deficit’”,Journal of Common Market Studies 33 (1995), 202–203.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See D. O'Keeffe, “The Free Movement of Persons and the Single Market”,European Law Review 17 (1992), 3–19, at 19, and H. D'Oliveira, “Expanding External and Shrinking Internal Borders: Europe's Defence Mechanisms in the Areas of Free Movement, Immigration and Asylum”, inLegal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty, ed. D. O'Keeffe and P. Twomey (London: Chancery Press, 1994), 261–78, at 278.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. Baldwin-Edwards, “Immigration After 1992”,Policy and Politics 19 (1991), 199–211, at 200.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Seesupra n. 39 M. Spencer,States of Injustice (London: Pluto, 1995), at 55–9, and also D. O'Keeffe, “The Schengen Convention: A Suitable Model for European Integration?”,Yearbook of European Law 11 (1991), 185–219.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seesupra n.39 M. Spencer,States of Injustice (London: Pluro, 1995), at 217, and O'Keeffe,supra n.44 and also D. O'Keeffe, “The Schengen Convention: A Suitable Model for European Integration?”,Yearbook of European Law 11 (1991), 185–219 at 217–9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. Rorty, “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality”, inOn Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, ed. S. Shute and S. Hurley (London: Basic Books, 1993), 111–34.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. Rawls,Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 164–72.

    Google Scholar 

  48. J. Rawls, “The Law of Peoples,” in Shute and Hurley,supra n.46On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, ed. S. Shute and S. Hurley (London: Basic Books, 1993), 111–34, at 41–82.

    Google Scholar 

  49. The extent to which Rorty and Rawls share a common political or philosophical vision is, of course, contentious. Rorty certainly claims that there is much in common. However, certain fundamental differences with regard to the role of comprehensive theories still remain. I have tried to address the nature of their relationship elsewhere, in “Another Look at the New Rawls”,Anglo-American Law Review 24 (1995), 104–22, concentrating particularly on a possible affinity with Kant's later writings.

  50. See R. Rorty,Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

    Ian Ward

Authors
  1. Ian Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, I. Identifying the eurosceptic. Res Publica 2, 87–100 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02335713

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02335713

Search

Navigation