Skip to main content
Log in

Knowing what we can do: actions, intentions, and the construction of phenomenal experience

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do questions concerning consciousness and phenomenal experience relate to, or interface with, questions concerning plans, knowledge and intentions? At least in the case of visual experience the relation, we shall argue, is tight. Visual perceptual experience, we shall argue, is fixed by an agent’s direct unmediated knowledge concerning her poise (or apparent poise) over a currently enabled action space. An action space, in this specific sense, is to be understood not as a fine-grained matrix of possibilities for bodily movement, but as a matrix of possibilities for pursuing and accomplishing one’s intentional actions, goals and projects. If this is correct, the links between planning, intention and perceptual experience are tight, while (contrary to some recent accounts invoking the notion of ‘sensorimotor expectations’) the links between embodied activity and perceptual experience, though real, are indirect. What matters is not bodily activity itself, but our practical knowledge (which need not be verbalized or in any way explicit) of our own possibilities for action. Such knowledge, selected, shaped and filtered by the grid of plans, goals, and intentions, plays, we argue, a constitutive role in explaining the content and character of visual perceptual experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballard D. (1991) Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence 48: 57–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard D., Hayhoe M., Pook P., Rao R. (1997) Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 20: 723–767l

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez, J.-L., & Macpherson, F. (1998). Nonconceptual content and the nature of perceptual experience. The Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 6.

  • Block N. (1995) On a confusion about the function of consciousness. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 18(2): 227–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block N. (2005) Review of Alva Noë, action in perception. Journal of Philosophy CII 5: 259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers P. (2000) Phenomenal consciousness: A naturalistic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright R. (2004) Sleepwalking violence: A sleep disorder, a legal dilemma and a psychological challenge. American Journal of Psychiatry 161: 1149–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers D. (2004) The representational character of experience. In: Leiter B. (eds) The future of philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland P., Ramachandran V., Sejnowski T. (1994) A critique of pure vision. In: Koch C., Davis J. (eds) Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2000) A case where access implies qualia?. Analysis 60: 30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2001) Visual experience and motor action: Are the bonds too tight?. Philosophical Review 110(4): 495–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2007) What reaching teaches: Consciousness, control, and the inner zombie. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58(3): 563–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp A. H., Matthews B. M., Oakey M., Crutchfield M. (1990) Sleepwalking, night terrors and consciousness. British Medical Journal 300: 360–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F. (1995) Naturalizing the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982). In J. McDowell (Ed.), The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Evans G. (1985) Molyneaux’s question. In the collected papers of Gareth Evans. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J. J. G. (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale M., Milner D. (2005) Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grush, R. (1998). Skill and spatial content. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 6.

  • Horgan T., Tienson J. (2002) The intentionality of phenomenology and the phenomenology of intentionality. In: Chalmers D. (eds) Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S. (1998) Consciousness in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S. (2006) Making sense of animals. In: Hurley S., Nudds M. (eds) Rational animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S., Noë A. (2006) Can hunter-gatherers hear colour?. In: Brennan G., Goodin R., Smith M. (eds) Common minds: Essays in honour of Philip Pettit. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson F. (1986) What Mary didn’t know. Journal of Philosophy 83: 291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson F. (2003) Mind and illusion. In: O’Hear A. (eds) Minds and persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement 53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P. (2006). Why visual experience is likely to resist being enacted, PSYCHE 12/1.

  • Jacob P., Jeannerod M. (2003) Ways of seeing: The scope and limits of visual cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M., Jacob P. (2005) Visual cognition: A new look at the two-visual systems model. Neuropsychologia 43: 301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston M. (1992) How to talk of the colors. Philosophical Studies 68: 221–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, I. (1964). The formation and transformation of the perceptual world. Published as a monograph in Psychological issues (Vol. 3, monograph 12). New York International University Press.

  • Lycan W. (1996) Consciousness and experience. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandik P. (1999) Qualia, space, and control. Philosophical Psychology 12(1): 47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthen M. (2005) Seeing, doing and knowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milner D., Goodale M. (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Myin, E. & O’Regan, J. K. (in press). Situated perception and sensation in vision and other modalities: A sensorimotor approach. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Noë A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan J.K., Noë A. (2001) A sensorimotor approach to vision and visual consciousness. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 24: 883–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit P. (2003) Looks as powers. Philosophical Issues 13: 221–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal D. (1997) Phenomenal consciousness and what it’s like (commentary on Block). Behavioural and Brain Sciences 20(1): 64–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949/2000). The concept of mind. London: Penguin Books

  • Schellenberg S. (2007) Action and self-location in perception. Mind 116: 603–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle J. (1990) Consciousness, explanatory inversion and cognitive science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13: 585–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker S. (1996) Colours, subjective reactions and qualia. Philosophical Issues Perception 7: 55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye M. (1995) Ten problems of consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, D., Roberts, T. & Clark, A. Knowing what we can do: actions, intentions, and the construction of phenomenal experience. Synthese 181, 375–394 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9714-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9714-6

Keywords

Navigation