Skip to main content
Log in

Two arguments against the punishment-forbearance account of forgiveness

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One account of forgiveness claims that to forgive is to forbear punishment. Call this the Punishment-Forbearance Account of forgiveness. In this paper I argue that forbearing punishment is neither necessary nor sufficient for forgiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to Zaibert’s account, “to forgive is deliberately to refuse to punish” (2009, p. 368). Hobbes connects forgiveness to pardon and therefore punishment in his Sixth Law of Nature: “A sixth law of Nature is this, ‘that, upon caution of the future time, a man ought to pardon the offences past of them that, repenting, desire it.’” (1969 [1651]). Of this law, Bernard Gert observes: “This virtue, which Hobbes calls having the facility to pardon, one can also call being forgiving” (2010, p. 98).

  2. For ease of expression, I will suppress this disjunction and simply speak in terms of causing pain. In doing so, I do not mean to imply that a goal of punishment must be to cause pain (as opposed to harm), or that one cannot punish by causing harm.

  3. Cf. Warmke (2011).

  4. This is to say nothing about whether such forgiveness is appropriate or not. Not all forgiveness is appropriate. But inappropriate forgiveness is still forgiveness, and what we are concerned with here are the conditions for forgiveness as such.

  5. It may not always be clear to the wrongdoer whether on a given occasion she is the recipient of blame or punishment, but these two constellations of practices are distinct constellations.

  6. I am grateful to an anonymous referee for raising this question.

  7. Or consider a judge whose job it is to punish criminals he has never encountered, a job he does “coolly”—he simply looks at the paperwork, decides what punishments to give, and pushes a button that effects the relevant punishments via a very complicated machine. Surely it would be a mistake to describe his actions as revenge-taking simply because he is punishing.

References

  • Darwall, S. (2006). The second-person standpoint: Morality, respect, and accountability. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving: Essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, E., and McNaughton, D. (2003). In Defence of Unconditional Forgiveness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.

  • Gert, B. (2010). Hobbes: Prince of peace. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, C. (2007). Forgiveness: A philosophical exploration. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. 1969 (1651). Leviathan. Menston, England: The Scholar Press Limited.

  • Holmgren, M. (1993). Forgiveness and the intrinsic value of persons. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. M. (1993). What is involved in forgiving? The Journal of Value Inquiry, 27, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, P. (1987). Forgiveness: Moral prerogative or religious duty? The Journal of Religious Ethics, 15, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, M. (2012). Conversation and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (2003). Getting even: Forgiveness and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.F. (1962). Freedom and Resentment. in John Martin Fischer and Mark Ravizza, eds.1993. Perspectives on Moral Responsibility. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Twambley, P. (1976). Mercy and forgiveness. Analysis, 36(2), 84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warmke, B. (2011). Is forgiveness the deliberate refusal to punish? Journal of Moral Philosophy, 8, 613–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaibert, L. (2009). The paradox of forgiveness. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 6, 365–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Eve Garrard, Michael McKenna, David McNaughton, Craig Warmke, and an anonymous referee for this journal for their helpful comments on previous versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon Warmke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warmke, B. Two arguments against the punishment-forbearance account of forgiveness. Philos Stud 165, 915–920 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9996-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9996-2

Keywords

Navigation