Abstract
We describe the results of an experiment on decision making in an insurance context. The experiment was designed to test for the underlying rationality of insurance consumers, where rationality is understood in usual economic terms. In particular, using expected utility as the preference function, we test for positive marginal utility, risk aversion, and decreasing absolute risk aversion, all of which are normal postulates for any microeconomic decision context under uncertainty or risk. We find that there the discrepancy from rational decision making increases with the sophistication of the rationality criteria, that irrationality concerning fair premium contracts is uncharacteristically high, and that the slope of absolute risk aversion seems to depend on the format of the insurance contract.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arrow, K. (1963), Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care, American Economic Review, December 1963, 941-969.
Arrow, K. (1971), Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago: Markham.
Gollier, C. and Schlesinger, H. (1996), Arrow's theorem on the optimality of deductibles: A stochastic dominance approach, Economic Theory, 7, 359-363.
Schoemaker, P. and Kunreuther, H. (1979), An experimental study of insurance decisions, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 46: 603-618.
Shopher, B. and Narramore, J. (2000), Stochastic choice and consistency in decision making under risk: An experimental study, Theory and Decision 48, 323-350.
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944), Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watt, R., Vázquez, F.J. & Moreno, I. An Experiment on Rational Insurance Decisions. Theory and Decision 51, 247–296 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015559127778
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015559127778