Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the Value-Pragmatics Hypothesis in Unethical Compliance

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We test conformity-related values applying the value-pragmatics hypothesis by evaluating how personal values related to compliance moderate the relationships between situational factors and unethical decisions. We examine the direct and indirect effects of the values of traditionalism, conformity, and stimulation, as they combine with the situational factors of rewards and punishments in the person–situation interaction model. We find strong support for the value-pragmatics view of ethical decision making and further build support for the person–situation interaction model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York, Holt, Rinehart, Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the banality of evil. New York: Penquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. 1956. Studies of Independence and Conformity. Psychological Monographs, 70(9): 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N., Windsor, C., & Trevino, L. 2006. Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision Making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4): 449–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1969. Social learning of moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11(3): 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, K. D., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 2000. Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7): 981–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, B., Gaa, J., Nainer, S., & Shehata, M. 2005. Experimental evidence of the Person Situation Interactive Model of Ethical Decision Making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. 1992. Social Organization for the Production of Evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3(2): 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. & Richter, A. 2006. Probing Three-Way Interactions in Moderated Multiple Regression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. 1991. Person-Job Fit: A Conceptual Integration, Literature Review, and Methodological Critique. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 6: 283–357. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. 1995. Values and Choice: The Influence of Choice Alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(11): 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenburg, J. 2002. Who Stole the Money and When? Individual and Situational Determinants of employee Theft. Organizational Behavior and Human decision Processes, 89(3): 985–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. 1991. The Conception of Value. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, J., Mayton, D., & Ball-Rokeach, S. 1994. Inducing Change In Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: Belief System Theory and the Method of Value Self-Confrontation. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4): 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, B. H. & Geyer, A. L. 2006. A nonconformist account of the Asch experiments: Values, pragmatics, and moral dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1): 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. 1988. Self-deception and the Nature of Mind. In B. McLaughlin & A. Rorty (Eds.), Perspectives on Self-Deception: 63–91. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. 1951. Values and Value Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1984. The Psychology of Moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. 1965. Class and Conformity. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G., Nail, P., & Levy, D. 2004. Expanding the Scope of the Social Response Context Model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26(1): 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millgram, S. 1963. The Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 67(3): 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M., Connelly, M., Helton, W., Van Dorn, J., & Osburn, H. 2001. Alternative Approaches for Measuring Values: Direct and Indirect Assessment in Performance Prediction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2): 348–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nail, P., MacDonald, G., & Levy, D. 2000. Proposal of a Four Dimensional Model of Social Response. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3): 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1965. The Moral Development of the Child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravlin, E. & Meglino, B. 1987. Issues in Work Value Measurement. Research in Corporate Social Performance, 9(9): 153–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. 1999. Post-conventional moral thinking: A neo-kohlbergian Approach. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbuam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S., & Bebeau, M. 2000. A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to Moral Research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4): 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safer, M.: 2007, Prisoner 5H834523, 60 Minutes: 13.15 Minutes (Columbia Broadcasting System, USA).

  • Schwartz, S.: 1996, Value Priorities and Behavior. In: S. Seligman, J. Olson & M. Zanna (Eds.), The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 8. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. 2006. Basic Human Values: Theory, Measurement and Applications. Revue francaise de sociologie, 4(74): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.: 2007, Personal Communication

  • Trevino, L. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. & Youngblood, S. A. 1990. Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4): 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wannsee Conference: 2007, http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/

  • Watson, G., Papamarcos, S., Teague, B., & Bean, C. 2004. Exploring the Dynamics of Business Values: A Self-Affirmation Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(4): 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. 1974. On Obedience to Authority, American Psychologist, 24(3): 566–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George W. Watson.

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, G.W., Berkley, R. Testing the Value-Pragmatics Hypothesis in Unethical Compliance. J Bus Ethics 87, 463–476 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9953-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9953-3

Keywords

Navigation