Abstract
The programmatic thrust of Thomasma and Pellegrino [5] is clarified and underscored and is interpreted as an attempt to introduce a fixed point into the ethical dimension of medicine by specifying some regulative principles for the medical profession. Two important features of this type of enterprise are noted: on the one hand, it may lead the profession to distinguish between technically identical actions on the basis of the normative principles it produces, thus excluding some morally permissible actions as duties constitutive of the art. It is argued that the formulation of the grounds for this ethic given by Thomasma and Pellegrino is insufficient. In order to speak to the clinical situation, medical ethics must not be based on merely the ‘living human body’ alone, but on the patientqua person.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Foucault, M.,The Birth of a Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception, Vintage Books, New York, 1975.
Kass, L. R., ‘Regarding the end of medicine and the pursuit of health’,The Public Interest 40, (1975) 11–42.
Pellegrino, E. D., ‘Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: The primacy of the act of the profession and the fact of illness’,The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4, (1979) 32–56.
Ramsey, P.,The Patient as Person, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1973.
Thomasma, D. C., and Pellegrino, E. D., ‘Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’,Metamedicine, this issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wear, S. Nuancing the Healer's art — The epistemology of patient competence. Metamedicine 2, 27–30 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00886342
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00886342