Literatur
Aquinas, Thomas,Summa Theologiae, Latin text and English translation, Blackfriars, London, 1967.
G. Boolos,The Unprovability of Consistency, Cambridge, 1979.
G. Frege,Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Bd. II, Wiss. Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1962 (Reprint form 1903).
M. B. Hesse, “Theories and the Transitivity of Confirmation”, in:Philosophy of Science 37 (1970), p. 50–63.
J. Hintikka,Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, New York, 1962.
E. Klevakina, “Epistemic Concepts and the Problem of Rationality”, in:Philosophy of the Natural Sciences, Proceedings of the 13th Intern. Wittgenstein Conference, ed. P. Weingartner and G. Schurz, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1989, chapter VII.
G. Kreisel — A. Levy, “Reflection Principles and their Use for Establishing the Complexity of Axiomatic Systems”, in:Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik 14 (1968), p. 97–142.
E. J. Lemmon, “New Foundations for Lewis' Modal Systems”, in:Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (1957), p. 176–186.
M. H. Löb, “Solution of a Problem of Leon Henkin”, in:Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (1955), p. 115–118.
K. R. Popper,Logik der Forschung, Mohr, Tübingen, 1969.
E. Post, “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, in:American Journal of Mathematics 43 (1921), p. 163–185. Reprinted in: J. v. Heijenoort (ed.),From Frege to Gödel, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.
W. V. O. Quine,The Ways of Paradox, Harvard University Press, 1976.
N. Rescher,Many Valued Logic, New York, 1969.
N. Rescher — A. Vander Nat, “On Alternatives in Epistemic Logic”, in:Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1973), p. 119–135.
R. Routley, “Necessary Limits to Knowledge: Unknowable Truths”, in: E. Morscher/O. Neumaier/G. Zecha (eds.),Philosophie als Wissenschaft/Essays in Scientific Philosophy, Comes, Bad Reichenhall 1981, p. 93–115.
G. Schurz,Relevant Deduction in Science and Ethics. [Habilitationsthesis], University of Salzburg, 1989 (Part I, chapter 2).
G. Schurz — P. Weingartner, ‘Verisimilitude Defined by Relevant Consequence elements. A new Reconstruction of Popper's Original Idea’, in: Th. Kuipers (ed.),What is Closer-to-the-Truth?, Rodopi, Amsterdam 1987, p. 47–77.
Sextus Empiricus,Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Heinemann, London, 1961.
P. Weingartner, “Ein Kalkül für die Begriffe ‘beweisbar’ und ‘entscheidbar’”, in:Akten des 14. Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie, Bd. III, Herder, Wien, 1969, p. 233–240.
P. Weingartner, “Conditions of Rationality for the Concepts Belief, Knowledge, and Assumption”, in:Dialectica 36 (1982), p. 243–263.
P. Weingartner, “Important Philosophical Problems and their Roots in Mathematics”, in:Epistemologia 10 (1987), p. 139–161. (Reprinted in:Archives de l'Institut Internationale des Sciences Théoriques 29: Les Relations Mutuelles entre la Philosophie des Sciences et l'Histoire des Sciences. Office International de Librairie — Bruxelles 1987, p. 139–161.
P. Weingartner, “Remarks on the Consequence Class of Theories”, in: E. Scheibe (ed.),The Role of Experience in Science, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1988, p. 161–180.
P. Weingartner — L. Schmetterer (eds.),Gödel Remembered, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1987.
P. Weingartner — G. Schurz, “Paradoxes Solved by Two Simple Relevance Criteria”, in:Logique et Analyse 113 (1986), p. 3–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weingartner, P. Antinomies and paradoxes and their solutions. Studies in Soviet Thought 39, 313–331 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838043
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838043