Skip to main content
Log in

Antinomies and paradoxes and their solutions

  • Published:
Studies in Soviet Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • Aquinas, Thomas,Summa Theologiae, Latin text and English translation, Blackfriars, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Boolos,The Unprovability of Consistency, Cambridge, 1979.

  • G. Frege,Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Bd. II, Wiss. Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1962 (Reprint form 1903).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. B. Hesse, “Theories and the Transitivity of Confirmation”, in:Philosophy of Science 37 (1970), p. 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hintikka,Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Klevakina, “Epistemic Concepts and the Problem of Rationality”, in:Philosophy of the Natural Sciences, Proceedings of the 13th Intern. Wittgenstein Conference, ed. P. Weingartner and G. Schurz, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1989, chapter VII.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Kreisel — A. Levy, “Reflection Principles and their Use for Establishing the Complexity of Axiomatic Systems”, in:Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik 14 (1968), p. 97–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. J. Lemmon, “New Foundations for Lewis' Modal Systems”, in:Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (1957), p. 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. Löb, “Solution of a Problem of Leon Henkin”, in:Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (1955), p. 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. R. Popper,Logik der Forschung, Mohr, Tübingen, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Post, “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, in:American Journal of Mathematics 43 (1921), p. 163–185. Reprinted in: J. v. Heijenoort (ed.),From Frege to Gödel, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. V. O. Quine,The Ways of Paradox, Harvard University Press, 1976.

  • N. Rescher,Many Valued Logic, New York, 1969.

  • N. Rescher — A. Vander Nat, “On Alternatives in Epistemic Logic”, in:Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1973), p. 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Routley, “Necessary Limits to Knowledge: Unknowable Truths”, in: E. Morscher/O. Neumaier/G. Zecha (eds.),Philosophie als Wissenschaft/Essays in Scientific Philosophy, Comes, Bad Reichenhall 1981, p. 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Schurz,Relevant Deduction in Science and Ethics. [Habilitationsthesis], University of Salzburg, 1989 (Part I, chapter 2).

  • G. Schurz — P. Weingartner, ‘Verisimilitude Defined by Relevant Consequence elements. A new Reconstruction of Popper's Original Idea’, in: Th. Kuipers (ed.),What is Closer-to-the-Truth?, Rodopi, Amsterdam 1987, p. 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus,Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Heinemann, London, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Weingartner, “Ein Kalkül für die Begriffe ‘beweisbar’ und ‘entscheidbar’”, in:Akten des 14. Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie, Bd. III, Herder, Wien, 1969, p. 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Weingartner, “Conditions of Rationality for the Concepts Belief, Knowledge, and Assumption”, in:Dialectica 36 (1982), p. 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Weingartner, “Important Philosophical Problems and their Roots in Mathematics”, in:Epistemologia 10 (1987), p. 139–161. (Reprinted in:Archives de l'Institut Internationale des Sciences Théoriques 29: Les Relations Mutuelles entre la Philosophie des Sciences et l'Histoire des Sciences. Office International de Librairie — Bruxelles 1987, p. 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Weingartner, “Remarks on the Consequence Class of Theories”, in: E. Scheibe (ed.),The Role of Experience in Science, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1988, p. 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Weingartner — L. Schmetterer (eds.),Gödel Remembered, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Weingartner — G. Schurz, “Paradoxes Solved by Two Simple Relevance Criteria”, in:Logique et Analyse 113 (1986), p. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weingartner, P. Antinomies and paradoxes and their solutions. Studies in Soviet Thought 39, 313–331 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838043

Keywords

Navigation