Abstract
There is an underappreciated disconnect between the ultimate values that lie at the heart of contemporary theories of distributive justice, and the practice of state institutions. State institutions deliver “intermediate goods” – goods such as health-care, education, housing, transportation, and the like – that are instrumental to a society being distributively just, but that do not in an of themselves constitute criteria of justice. Researchers who have emphasized the “social determinants of health” provide an insight that, when generalized, point us in a direction that theorists of distributive justice should follow, that of attending not just to the instrinsic value of intermediate goods, but also to their causal contributions to realizing the values that theories of distributive justice make central. “Platforms”, which represent principle-driven attempts at designing compossible policies that attend both to the causal and to the intrinsic value of intermediate goods, should be given more importance within theories of distributive justice if such theories are to be policy-relevant, for they connect the ultimate values of these theories to the practices of state institutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brighouse, Harry, and Adam Swift. 2008. Legitimate parental partiality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37: 43–80.
Daniels, Norman. 1985. Just health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, Norman. 2007. Just health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Justice in the distribution of health care. McGill Law Review 38:883–898.
Heath, Joseph. 2002. The efficient society. Toronto: Penguin Books.
Marmot, Michael, and Richard Wilkinson. 2005. Social determinants of health, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mason, Andrew. 2011. Putting story-reading to bed: A reply to Segall. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14: 81–88.
Mill, John Stuart. 2004 [1861]. Considerations on representative government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Onora, O’Neill. 1987. Abstraction, idealization, and ideology in ethics. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22: 55–69.
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Segall, Shlomi. 2011. If you’re and egalitarian, how come you read bedtime stories to your children? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14: 23–40.
Sen, Amartya. 1980. Equality of what? In Tanner lectures on human values 1, ed. Sterling McMurrin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weinstock, Daniel. 2004. Quelles sont nos valeurs? À la recherche d’une méthodologie, Éthique publique 5: 29–36.
Weinstock, Daniel. 2011. How political philosophers should think of health. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36: 424–435.
Weinstock, Daniel. 2015. Sites of deliberation in contemporary electoral systems, Journal of Parliamentary and Public Affairs 9(2).
Wilkinson, Richard, and Kate Pickett. 2011. The spirit level. Why greater equality makes societies stronger. London: Bloomsbury Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinstock, D. Integrating Intermediate Goods to Theories of Distributive Justice: The Importance of Platforms. Res Publica 21, 171–183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9274-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9274-1