Skip to main content

Moral Capacities of Psychotic and Addicted Individuals

  • Chapter
The Variables of Moral Capacity

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 21))

Abstract

Most discussions of the moral capacities of psychotic individuals conclude that they have no control over their mental illness. Therefore, such an individual’s moral capacity in any area of behavior affected by that illness can provide a legal “excuse.” If the individual meets the ambiguous and sometimes arbitrary standards for insanity tests, that person can be found “not guilty” by reason of insanity in the criminal arena. In the civil contract area, if it should have been obvious to the other party that the person was too mentally disturbed to assess and knowingly agree to the contract, the contract could be voided. Individuals generally are excused in either arena if there is severe cognitive impairment as a result of a mental disorder and, in some jurisdictions, if there is severe volitional impairment. They often are considered sufficiently disabled to be held responsible for their actions since they lack sufficient moral capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Perlin, M.L. (1994) The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, R.E., Yudofsky, S.C., and Talbott, J.A. (1994) Textbook of Psychiatry. 2nd ed. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. J. (1985) Excusing the crazy: The insanity defense reconsidered. Southern California Law Review 58, 777–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovenko, R. (1995) Psychiatry and Criminal Culpability, John Wiley, Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R., Leong, G.B., Silva, J.A. (1996) California’s diminished capacity defense: Evolution and transformation. Bulletin American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 24, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weinstock, R. (2004). Moral Capacities of Psychotic and Addicted Individuals. In: Thomasma, D.C., Weisstub, D.N. (eds) The Variables of Moral Capacity. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6677-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2552-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics