Skip to main content
Log in

Justice, sexual harassment, and the reasonable victim standard

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In determining when sexual behavior in the workplace creates a hostile working environment, some courts have asked, ‘Would a reasonableperson view this as a hostile environment?’ Two recent court decisions, recognizing male-female differences in the perception of social sexual behavior at work, modified this standard to ask, “Would a reasonablevictim view this as a hostile environment?” As yet, there is no consensus in the legal community regarding which of these standards is just.

We propose that moral theory provides the framework from which business people can construct just procedures regarding sexually hostile environments. We argue that the natural duty of mutual respect of persons and the natural duty not to harm the innocent compels business people to identify sexually hostile work environments from the perspective of the reasonable victim, usually from the woman's perspective.

Within the context of this moral framework, a training approach designed to reduce the incidence of sexually harassing behaviors in the workplace is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bower, S. A. and Bower, G. H.: 1976,Asserting Yourself A Practical Guide for Positive Change (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawley, H. H. and Wenrich, W. W.: 1976,Achieving Assertive Behavior (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, S. S.: 1984,Assertive Supervision: Building Involved Teamwork (Research Press, Champaign, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epping, A. R.: 1992 (January 16), ‘Everything You've Always Wanted to Know About Sexual Harassment but Were Afraid to Ask’,Speech to The Association of Government Accountants Omaha Metro Area Chapter.

  • Guidelines on Discrimination on the Basis of Sex: 1980, (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, DC).

  • Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G. and Konrad, A. M.: 1990, ‘Predicting Social-Sexual Behavior at Work: A Contact Hypothesis’,Academy of Management Journal 33, pp. 560–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, V. E. and Pearce, T. G.: 1987, ‘Vinson: Sexual Harassment and Employer Response’,Labor Law Journal 38, pp. 770–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. S.: 1991 (May 28), ‘Courts Concede the Sexes Think in Unlike Ways’,Wall Street Journal 217, pp. B1 and B5.

  • Hukill, C.: 1991 (May), ‘Significant decisions in labor cases’,Monthly Labor Review 114, pp. 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen, Jr., C. M.: 1990 (August), ‘Sexual Harassment Claims Stem From a Hostile Work Environment’,Personnel Journal 69, pp. 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, D. A.: 1991, Personal communication.

  • Morlacci, M.: 1987, ‘Sexual Harassment Law and the Impact of Vinson’,Employee Relations Law Journal 13, pp. 501–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, B. S., Barlow, W. E. and Hatch, D. D.: 1991 (May), ‘“Reasonable Woman” is New Standard for Sexual Harassment’,Personnel Journal 67, pp. 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, E. A.: 1976, (July) ‘The Social Response Process in Commercial Banks: An Empirical Investigation’,Academy of Management Review 1, pp. 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971,A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowlin, W. A.: 1988 (December), ‘Sexual Harassment in the Workplace’,The Arbitration Journal 43, pp. 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, J. A.: 1990 (June), ‘Safe Sex: A Workplace Oxymoron?’,HR Magazine 35, pp. 175–176, 178, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1991, ‘Ellison v. Brady: A “Reasonable Woman” Standard for Sexual Harassment’,Employee Relations Law Journal 17, pp. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deborah Wells is an Assistant Professor of Management at Creighton University. She received her Ph.D. in industrial/organizational psychology. Her publications have appeared in theJournal of Applied Psychology and theJournal of Vocational Behavior. Her primary research interests are related to women's workplace issues.

Beverly Kracher is an Assistant Professor of Business Ethics and Society at Creighton University. She received her Ph.D. in philosophy. She has lectured on business ethics to accounting, sales, and management groups. Her current research interests are ethical role modeling, the place of moral motivation in business, and sexual harassment in the workplace.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wells, D.L., Kracher, B.J. Justice, sexual harassment, and the reasonable victim standard. J Bus Ethics 12, 423–431 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01666555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01666555

Keywords

Navigation