Skip to main content
Log in

The CEO's Influence on Corporate Foundation Giving

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some scholars have argued that CEOs may have excessive influence on their foundation's trustees to give away a portion of company profits to charitable causes in order to gain access to elite circles or support the CEO's personal causes. This may result in charitable contributions that ultimately serve the personal interests of the CEOs without regard to corporate interests or social needs. We examine the extent that CEOs appear to direct charitable giving to be compatible with their own personal interests, and if CEO participation on the foundation board affects the relationship between CEO personal interests and charitable giving. Using a sample of 160 corporate foundations, our results showed that CEOs' interests, as measured by membership in different non-profit organizations, was associated with foundation charitable giving. This association decreased, but was not eliminated, when CEOs were absent from the foundation board. Implications of these findings for researchers and managers are discussed in regards to both agency theory and stewardship theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, L. and J. Galaskiewicz: 1988, ‘Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity', Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliga, B., R. Moyer and R. Rao: 1996, ‘CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What's the Fuss?', Strategic Management Journal 17, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B.: 1995, ‘CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model', Strategic Management Journal 16, 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, B. and J. Wang: 1998, ‘Board Diversity and Managerial Control as Predictors of Corporate Social Performance', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1595–1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.: 1999, ‘If You Even Doubt It's Better to Give, Here's Proof Positive', Wall Street Journal February 2, 1999, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and P. Cohen: 1975, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman and L. Donaldson: 1997, ‘Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management', Academy of Management Review 22, 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review', Academy of Management Review 14, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.: 1980, ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm', Journal of Political Economy 88, 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. and S. D'Aveni: 1994, ‘CEO Duality as a Double-edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command', Academy of Management Journal 37(5), 1079–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘Corporate Philanthropy and the Business Benefit: A Need for Clarity', New York Times Magazine 32 (Sept. 13), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudberg, D.: 1986, The Corporate Conscience: Money, Power, and Responsible Businesses (AMACOM, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J.: 1985, Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy: A Study of Business Philanthropy and Nonprofit Organizations (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J.: 1997, ‘An Urban Grants Economy Revisited: Corporate Charitable Contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–1981, 1987–1989', Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1973, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties', American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, J. L.: 1997, Looking-good and Doing Good: Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Power (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling: 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure', Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F.: 1993, Corpoerate Foundation Profiles (The Foundation Center, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F.: 1994, Corpoerate Foundation Profiles (The Foundation Center, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Etang, J.: 1995, ‘Ethical Corporate Social Responsibility: A Framework for Managers', Journal of Business Ethics 14, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal 31(4), 854–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, P.: 1988, ‘Why Do Corporations Give to Charity?', Journal of Business 61, 65–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parket, I. and H. Eibert: 1975, ‘Social Responsibility: The Underlying Factors', Business Horizons 18(4), 5–10. Foundation Giving 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, A.: 1994, In Pursuit of Profit (Putnam, New York).

  • Sharfman, M.: 1994, ‘Changing Institutional Rules: The Evolution of Corporate Philanthropy, 1883–1953', Business and Society 33(3), 236(34).

  • Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny: 1994, ‘Takeovers in the 1960s and the 1980s: Evidence and Implications', in R. P. Rumelt, D. E. Schendel and D. J. Teece (eds.), Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny: 1997, ‘A Survey of Corporate Governance', Journal of Finance 52, 737–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P.: 1995, Greening Business: Profiting the Corporation and the Environment (Thompson Executive Press, Cincinnati, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, A.: 1995, ‘Strategic Giving, Local Giving and Customer Ties', Annual Survey of Corporate Contributions (Conference Board, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance', Academy of Management Review 10, 540–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. and S. Kutner: 1986, ‘Corporate Contributions to Culture and the Arts: The Organization of Giving and the Influence of the Chief Executive Officer and of Other Firms on Company Contributions in Massachusetts', in Paul DiMaggio (ed.), Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint (Oxford University Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J., J. Porac and T. Pollock: 1997, ‘Hitch Your Corporate Wagon to a CEO Star? Testing Two Views About the Pay, Reputation and Performance of Top Executives', Corporate Reputation Review 1(1&2), 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. and B. S. Coffey: 1992, ‘Board Composition and Corporate Philanthropy', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 771–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward's: 1994, Business Directory of U.S.Private and Public Companies (Gale Research, Inc., Detroit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbel, J. and M. Wortman: 1998, Corporate Philanthropy: A Tool to Manage Images of Corporate Social Responsibility. Presented at the Academy of Management Meetings San Diego, CA, August.

  • Who's Who in America: 1994, Marquis, New Providence, NJ.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werbel, J.D., Carter, S.M. The CEO's Influence on Corporate Foundation Giving. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 47–60 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019904820344

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019904820344

Navigation