Abstract
Due to the controversy surround his political war-time writings, Nishida Kitarō and his entire corpus has been accused of promoting and supporting Japanese imperialism. Despite the valid criticisms of his writings during the war-time period, Nishida’s early work in An Inquiry into the Good is not so easily interpreted as supporting nationalism. In fact, depending on the lens through which one reads Nishida’s early writings, one can even find the germs of emancipatory ideas that can easily be put in dialogue with other liberatory thinkers such as Marx, Kropotkin, and Adorno. In this article, by considering the pluripotentiality of the text rather than a hermetically sealed off nationalist reading of it, I reread the ethical politics in An Inquiry into the Good through an emancipatory lens, considering how Nishida’s thought could have been taken up in a very different post-1911 Japan that did not move toward authoritarian militarism. Furthermore, I argue that the ambiguity surrounding his early political writings is consistent with his resistance to authoritarian ethics and his emphasis on the autonomy of the individual.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. (1973). Negative dialectics. Continuum. (E. B. Ashton, Trans).
Dale, P. N. (1986). The myth of japanese uniqueness. Croom Helm.
Goto-Jones, C. S. (2005). Political philosophy in Japan: Nishida, the Kyoto School and Co-Prosperity. Routledge.
Haver, W. (2012). Introduction. In W. Haver (Ed.), Ontology of production (pp. 1–34). Duke University Press.
Horkheimer, M. (2002). Critical theory: Selected Essays. Continuum.
Jacinto, A. Z. (1995). The return of the past: Tradition and the political microcosm in the later Nishida. In J. W. Heisig, & J. C. Maraldo (Eds.), Rude awakenings: Zen, the Kyoto School, & the question of Nationalism (pp. 132–148). University of Hawaiʻi Press.
Kaye, B. (2022). Marx after the Kyoto School: Utopia and the pure land. Rowman & Littlefield.
Kropotkin, P. (2008). The Conquest of Bread. AK Press.
Krummel, J. W. M. (2022). On nothingness in the heart of the Empire and the Wartime Politics of the Kyoto School. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 14(1), 99–109.
Mackie, V., & Susumu, Y. (2014). Introduction. M. Gavin and B. Middleton (Eds.), Japan and the High Treason Incident. Routledge.
Marshall, P. (2008). Demanding the impossible: A history of Anarchism. Harper Perennial.
Marx, K. (1990). Capital volume 1. Penguin Books.
Marx, K. (1992). Early Writings. Penguin Books.
Najita, T., & Harootunian, H. D. (1988). Japanese revolt against the West: Political and cultural criticism in the twentieth century. In J. W. Hall, M. B. Jansen, M. Kanai, & D. Twitchett (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Japan (pp. 711–774). Cambridge University Press.
Nishida, K. (1990). An Inquiry into the good. Yale University Press.
Nishida, K., & 西田幾多郎 (2016). Zen no kenkyū 善の研究. Iwanami Shoten 岩波書店. Retrieved from http://www.aozora.gr.jp/
Osaki, H. (2019). Nothingness in the heart of empire: The Moral and Political Philosophy of the Kyoto School in Imperial Japan. State University of New York Press.
Parkes, G. (1997). The putative Fascism of the Kyoto School and the political correctness of the Modern Academy. Philosophy East and West, 47(3), 305–336.
Parkes, G. (2008). The definite internationalism of the Kyoto School: Changing attitudes in the contemporary academy. In C. Goto-Jones (Ed.), Re-Politicising the Kyoto School as Philosophy. (pp. 161–182). Routledge.
Rhydwen, T. P. (2018). A confucian in buddhist clothing? – interpreting Nishida’s conception of the good as a realisation of the mandate of Heaven. Asian Philosophy, 28(4), 368–392.
Stromback, D. (2022). The political Dangers of Nishida’s View of Embodiment. Philosophy East and West, 72(2), 432–452.
Tosaka, J. (1977). Nihon ideorogīron. Iwanami shoten.
Ueda Shizuteru. (1995). Nishida, Nationalism, and the War in question. In J. W. Heisig, & J. C. Maraldo (Eds.), Rude awakenings: Zen, the Kyoto School, & the question of Nationalism (pp. 77–106). University of Hawaiʻi Press.
Uhl, C. (2017). Nishida Kitarō and the Antinomies of Bourgeois Philosophy. In Confronting Capital and Empire (Vol. 6, pp. 105–140).
Yusa, M. (1995). Nishida and Totalitarianism: A philosopher’s resistance. In J. W. Heisig, & J. C. Maraldo (Eds.), Rude awakenings: Zen, the Kyoto School, & the question of Nationalism (pp. 107–131). University of Hawaiʻi Press.
Yusa, M. (2002). Zen & Philosophy: An intellectual biography of Nishida Kitarō. University of Hawai’i Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Werner, G. The Germs of Emancipatory Politics in An Inquiry into the Good. Journal East Asian Philosophy 2, 179–198 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43493-023-00019-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43493-023-00019-2