Skip to main content
Log in

Property rights and groundwater in Nebraska

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Property rights are important institutions that influence economic performance and reflect the historical, cultural, and political realities of particular societies. Drawing on a variety of concepts from legal and economic studies, a framework for explaining the origin and evolution of property rights is developed and applied to the specific case of changing ground water rights in Nebraska. The Nebraska case is an interesting example of reliance on local control in regulating water use. Despite the importance of local initiatives in ground water management, this case also illustrates the need for external support from the judicial and legislative systems. The evolution of ground water property rights in Nebraska, as in other parts of the United States, has been conditioned by historical circumstances and changing values and attitudes as well as by economic and political forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agra-Europe, newsletter on agriculture in the European Community, London, April 12, 1991.

  • Aiken, J. David. (1980). “Nebraska Ground Water Law and Administration,” 59Nebraska Law Review 917.

  • Aiken, J. David. (1993). “Protecting the Hidden Resource: The Quiet Crisis in Nebraska Pesticide and Ground Water Protection Policies.”Creighton Law Review, forthcoming.

  • Aiken, J. David. “Western Ground Water Law: Overview and Recent Developments.” Staff paper 1990–2, Dept. of Agric. Econ., University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Terry L., Oscar R. Burt, and David T. Fractor. “Privatizing Ground Water Basins: A Model and Its Application.” inWater Rights, edited, by Terry L. Anderson, San Francisco: Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Yoram.Economic Analysis of Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie, Sandra. “Alternative Views of Property Rights: Implications for Agricultural Use of Natural Resources.”Am J of Ag Ec, 66-5(Dec., 1984): 814–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven Tipton.Habits of the Heart. New York: Harper and Row, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, Daniel (1989a). “Entitlements, Missing Markets, and Environmental Uncertainty.”J of Environ and Econ Management, 17: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, Daniel (1989b). “Institutional Change and Economic Efficiency.”J of Econ Issues 23-3(Sept.): 735–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, Daniel. “Entitlements, Missing Markets, and Environmental Uncertainty: Reply.”J of Environ and Econ Management, 20 (1991):297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, Daniel and Ian Hodge. “Private Property Rights and Presumptive Policy Entitlements: Reconsidering the Premises of Rural Policy.”Eur Rev of Ag Econ 17-2 (1990): 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Arthur H. “Rural Community Values in Groundwater Marketing.”J of Econ Issues, 24-2 (June, 1990): 463–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A.Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. “The Problem of Social Cost.”J of Law and Econ, 3 (October, 1960).

  • Dore, M. H. I. and A. J. Ward. “Entitlements, Missing Markets and Environmental Policy.”J of Environ and Econ Management, 20 (1991): 290–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faeth, Paul, Robert Repetto, Kim Kroll, Qi Dai, and Glenn Helmers.Paying the Farm Bill: US Agricultural Policy and the Transition to Sustainable Agriculture. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Joseph. “Information and the Coase Theorem.”J of Econ Perspectives, 1–2 (Fall, 1987):113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Ronald C. “The Welfare Analytics of Transactions Costs, Externalities, and Institutional Choice.” Unpublished manuscript, Dept. of Ag. Econ., Texas A&M Univ., 1989.

  • Hayami, Yujiro and Vernon W. Ruttan.Agricultural Development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, Steven.What Price Incentives? Economists and the Environment. Boston: Auburn House Publishing, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynne, Gary D. and Jeffrey Burkhardt. “The Evolution of Water Institutions in Florida: A Neoinstitutionalist Perspective.”J of Econ Issues, 24-4 (Dec. 1990):1059–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebraska Department of Agriculture.Nebraska Agricultural Statistics, Lincoln, October, 1990.

  • North, Douglass C. “Institutions.”J of Econ Perspectives, 5-1 (Winter, 1991): 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, Susan C. “Developing City Water Supplies by Drying Up Farms: Contradictions Raised in Water Institutions Under Stress.”Ag. and Human Values, IV-4 (Fall 1987): 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor.Governing the Commons. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, John. “Private and Common Property Rights in the Economics of the Environment.”J of Econ Issues, 22-4 (Dec., 1988): 1071–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C. Ford. “Strategic Interdependence in Models of Property Rights.”Am J of Ag Ec, 66-5 (Dec. 1984): 807–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, Mark.The Economy of the Earth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, A. Allan.Property, Power, and Public Choice. New York: Praeger, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, James Duncan. “Selective Perceptions and the Politics of Agricultural Policy.” InThe Political Economy of US Agriculture: Challenges for the 1990s, edited by Carol Kramer. Washington, DC: Res. for the Future, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, Richard L. and John A. Baden.Natural Resources: Bureaucratic Myths and Environmental Management. San Francisco: Pacific Inst. for Public Policy Research, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, Robert. “Spontaneous Order.”J of Econ Perspectives, 3–4 (Fall, 1989): 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaney, James A. “Common Property, Reciprocity, and Community.”J of Econ Issues, 24-2 (June 1990): 451–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlock, A. Dan. “Market Best Means to Manage Water.”The Lincoln Journal-Star, Lincoln, Nebraska, April 12, 1992.

  • The Lincoln Star, Lincoln, Nebraska, various issues.

  • Wandschneider, Philip R. “Neoclassical and Institutional Explanations of Changes in Northwest Water Institutions.”J of Econ Issues, 20-1 (March, 1986): 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Helpful comments on this paper were provided by the Editor of this journal and two anonymous reviewers. University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division Journal Series Number 9996.

E. Wesley F. Peterson is associate professor of agricultural economics at the University of Nebraska. Most of his research has been in the area of international agricultural trade with a focus on international institutions and policies.

J. David Aiken is professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska. He holds a JD from George Washington and is a specialist in the areas of agricultural and water law.

Bruce B. Johnson is professor of agricultural economics at the University of Nebraska. His research interests are primarily in natural resources and land economics. He also teaches part of a course in agricultural ethics.

Helpful comments on this paper were provided by the Editor of this journal and two anonymous reviewers. University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division Journal Series Number 9996.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wesley, E., Peterson, F., Aiken, J.D. et al. Property rights and groundwater in Nebraska. Agric Hum Values 10, 41–49 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217559

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217559

Keywords

Navigation