skip to main content
article

What is cyberwoman?: The Second Sex in cyberspace

Published:24 October 2000Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper I wish to show that, although traditional notions of gender and sex break down in cyberspace, a revised Beauvoirian understanding of sexual secondariness is applicable and useful in coming to terms with the possible ethical and philosophical ramifications of this relatively new communication medium. To this end, I argue that persons who enter into communication in online chat rooms necessarily deny the bodily aspects of their own identity. In so doing, these persons make themselves inessential, or secondary, in Beauvior's sense. For Beauvoir, this is a denial of one's own freedom, and thus commmunication in cyberspace becomes an instance of self-oppression. Yet, if self-oppression can be avoided, the self-oppressor is morally responsible for her or his own oppression. Ultimately, I argue, cyberspatial communication is an instance of such self-oppression.

References

  1. Anne Balsamo. The Virtual Body in Cyberspace. In Joan Rothschild and Frederick Ferré, editors, Research in Philosophy & Technology, vol. 13, Technology and Feminism, pp. 119-39. JAI Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Simone de Beauvoir. Le deuxieme sexe. 2 vols. Gallimard, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Simone de Beauvoir. The Ethics of Ambiguity. Bernard Frechtman, translator. Citadel Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Simone de Beauvoir. Pour une morale de l'ambiguité, suivi de Pyrrhus et Cinéas. Gallimard, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Simone de Beauvoir. The Second Sex. H. M. Parshley, translator. Knopf, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Judith Butler. Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir's Second Sex. In Elizabeth Fallaize, editor, Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, pp. 29-42. Routledge, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kevin Crowston and Ericka Kammerer. Communicative Style and Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Communications. In Bosah Ebo, editor, Cyberghetto or Cybertopia?: Race, Class, and Gender on the Internet, pp. 185-203. Praeger, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Karen Green. Sartre and de Beauvoir on Freedom and Oppression. In Julien S. Murphy, editor, Feminist Interpretations of Jean-Paul Sartre, pp. 175-99. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbert Herdt, editor. Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History. Zone Books, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michele Hunkele and Karen Cornwell. The Cyberspace Curtain: Hidden Gender Issues. In Susan J. Drucker and Gary Gumpert, editors, Voices in the Street: Explorations in Gender, Media, and Public Space, pp. 281-93. Hampton Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sonia Kruks. Simone de Beauvoir: Teaching Sartre About Freedom. In Margaret A. Simons, editor, Feminist Interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, pp. 79-95. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Catriona Mackenzie. A Certain Lack of Symmetry: Beauvoir on Autonomous Agency and Women's Embodiment. In Ruth Evans, editor, Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex: New Interdisciplinary Essays, pp. 122-58. Manchester University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vivian Sobchak. Democratic Franchise and the Electronic Frontier. In Ziauddin Sardar and Jerome R. Ravetz, editors, Cyberfutures: Culture and Politics on the Information Superhighway , pp. 77-89. New York University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sherry Turkle. Tinysex and Gender Trouble. In Patrick D. Hopkins, editor, Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture, Gender, and Technology, pp. 395-416. Indiana University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access