REFERENCES
Allaby, M. (1991) (ed): The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Zoology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beeman, O. (1996): 'What are you? Male, Merm, Herm, Ferm or Female?', Baltimore Morning Sun March 17: 1F.
Bennett, D. (1969): 'Essential Properties', Journal of Philosophy 66, 487–499.
Berkow, R. (1992): The Merck Manual of Diagnoses and Therapy, 16th edn. Rahway, N.J.: Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Research Laboratory.
Brody, B. (1973): 'Why Settle for Anything Less than Good Old-Fashioned Aristotelian Essentialism', Nous 7, 351–365.
Coyne, J. (1995): 'Speciation in Monkeyflowers', Nature 376, 726–727.
Cresswell, M. (1971): 'Essence and Existence in Plato and Aristotle', Theoria 37, 91–113.
Dupre, J. (1990): The Disorder of Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grady, D. (1997): 'New Tactic of Invasion by AIDS Virus Is Found', The New York Times July 17: A18.
Gray, P. (1967): The Dictionary of the Biological Sciences, New York: Reinhold Publishing Co.
Hull, D. (1989): 'On Human Nature', The Metaphysics of Evolution, Albany,NY: State University of New York Press.
Kolata, G. (1992): 'Track Federation Urges End To Gene Test for Femaleness', The New York Times Feb. 12: A1 & B11.
Kripke, S. (1972): 'Naming and Necessity', in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, 2nd edn. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Marcus, R. (1971): 'Essential Attribution', Journal of Philosophy 68, 187–202.
Matthews, G. (1990): 'Aristotelian Essentialism', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 251–262.
Mayr, E. (1970): Populations, Species and Evolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Parsons, T. (1967): 'Grades of Essentialism in Quantified Modal Logic', Nous 1, 181–191.
Putnam, H. (1975): 'Is Semantics Possible?', Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sadker, M. and Sadker, D. (1994): Failing at Fairness, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Teller, P. (1975): 'Essential Properties: Some Problems and Conjectures', Journal of Philosophy 72, 233–248.
Wolterstorff, N. (1980): Works and Worlds of Art, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wetzel, L. Is Socrates Essentially a Man?. Philosophical Studies 98, 203–220 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018611019751
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018611019751