Skip to main content
Log in

Conjectures on the dynamics of secrecy and the secrets business

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the dynamics of secrecy and the secrets business. Secrets are defined as bits of information that, for one reason or another, are kept hidden or controlled so as to elude attention, observation or comprehension. Three conceptual lenses — the micro-analytic focusing on self-deception, the social-psychological focusing on self-disclosure, and the macro-analytic focusing on public secrets — are probed. Secrecy at each of the three levels is revealed to be a janusfaced issue providing undeniable benefits to Homo sapiens in their efforts to adapt to a changing world yet also creates undeniable problems. While secrecy provides the occasion for the demonstration of loyalty and intimacy, it also generates the conditions for exclusion and betrayal. The contemporary impulse to create public forums in which all is revealed, in which ‘sunlight’ prevails, is too simple a panacea to those who use the topic of secrecy as an occasion to correct social, political and economic problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsson, B.: 1970, ‘Homans on Exchange: Hedonism Revived’, American Journal of Sociology 67, 422–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, David: 1975, ‘The Irony of Security’, Urban Life 4, 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Kest: 1981, ‘An Analysis of Self-deception’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41, 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, David: 1954, ‘A Reconsideration of the Problems of Introspection’, Psychological Bulletin 51, 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlay, Stephen: 1974, The Secrets Business, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel: 1973, The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, Beryl: 1981, ‘The Paradox of Secrecy’, Human Studies 4, 1–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bensman, Joseph and Robert Lilienfield: 1979, Between Public and Private: The Lost Boundaries of the Self, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M.: 1964, Exchange and Power is Social Life, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert: 1969, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, Sissela: 1980, ‘The Self-deceived’, Social Science Information 19, 923–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, Sissela: 1982, Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation, New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, Steven J.: 1975, Game Theory and Politics, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisset, Dennis and Charles Edgley: 1975, Life as Theatre: A Dramaturgical Science Book, Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kenneth: 1972, Dramatism and Development, Barre, Mass.: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaikin, Alan L. and Valerian J. Derlega: 1974, Self-Disclosure, Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Abner: 1971, ‘The Politics of Ritual Secrecy’, MAN 6, 427–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Abner: 1981, The Politics of Elite Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis: 1963, ‘The Dysfunctions of Military Secrecy’, Social Problems 11, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, Thomas J.: 1977, Private Lives Public Accounts, Amherst: University of Massahusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, Thomas J.: 1980, Children's Secrets, Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozby, Paul C.: 1973, ‘Self-disclosure: A Literature Review’, Psychological Bulletin 79, 73–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. I. and A. L. Chaiken: 1975, Sharing Intimacy: What We Reveal to Others and Why, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilman, Ilham and D. Z. Phillips: 1971, Sense and Delusion, New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Rudolf and Elaine Caruth: 1972, ‘Keeping Secrets’, in Peter L. Giovacchini (ed.), Tactics and Techniques in Psychoanalytic Therapy, London: Hogarth House, 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeh, Peter P.: 1974, Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon: 1985, The Multiple Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Patricia: 1979, ‘The Role of Secrecy in Complex Organizations: From Norms of Rationality to Norms of Distrust’, Cornell Journal of Social Relations 14, 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert: 1969, Self-Deception, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraiberg, Selma: 1954, ‘Tales of the Discovery of the Secret Treasure’, Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 9, 218–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, Thomas M. and Edward Weisband (eds.): 1974, Secrecy and Foreign Policy, London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund: 1955, ‘The Uncanny’, in James Strachey (ed. and trans.), The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, London: Hogarth Press, 17, 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabis, Stanley T.: 1978, ‘Political Secrecy and Cultural Conflict: A Plea for Formalism’, Administration and Society 10, 139–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor, Itzhak: 1975, ‘Government Secrecy: Exchanges, Intermediaries and Middlemen’, Public Administration Review 35, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor, Itzhak: 1977, ‘The Information Marketplace’, in I. Galnoor (ed.), Government Secrecy in Democracies, New York: Harper and Row, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, Kenneth J.: 1971, The Concept of the Self, New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, Kenneth J.: 1977, ‘Social Exchange Theory in a World of Transient Fact’, in E. Hamblin and J. Kunkel (eds.), Behavioral Theory in Sociology, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving: 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving: 1967, Interaction Ritual, Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving: 1977, ‘The Arrangement between the Sexes’, Theory and Society 4, 301–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Alfred: 1951, ‘The Secret’, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 15, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haight, M. R.: 1980, A Study of Self-Deception, Sussex: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, Y.: 1970, Perspectives on the Post-Industrial Society, Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C.: 1961, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, New York: Harcourt, Brace, World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Icheiser, Gustav: 1970, Appearances and Realities, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, Sidney M.: 1971a, Self-Disclosure: An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self, New York: Wiley — Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Carl Gustav: 1933, Modern Man in Search of a Soul, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.: 1978, ‘Concerted Ignorance: The Social Construction of Coverup’, Urban Life 8, 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-Farlow, John: 1969, ‘“Mine” and the Family of Human Imaginings’, Inquiry 12, 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, Orrin E.: 1964, Symbolic Leaders: Public Dramas and Public Men, Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, Joseph: 1969, Of Human Interaction, Palo Alto: National Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, Thomas A. and William Weitzel: 1978, ‘Secrecy and Managerial Compensation’, Industrial Relations 17, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, James and Bernard Meltzer (eds.): 1972, Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology, 2nd edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Mike W. (ed.): 1985, Self-Deception and Self-Understanding: New Essays in Philosophy and Psychology, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George Herbert: 1934, Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behavioralist, compiled and edited by C. W. Morris, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meares, Russell: 1976, ‘The secret’, Psychiatry 39, 258–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Roberto: 1962, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracies, translated by Eden and Cedar Paul, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, Mark: 1975, ‘Corporate Secrecy and Political Accountability’, Public Administration Review 35, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigel, Howard: 1971, Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, Brian J.: 1980, ‘Secrecy in Business: A Sociological View’, in S. K. Tefft (ed.), Secrecy: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, New York: Human Sciences Press, 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, John: 1972, ‘On Private Troubles and Public Issues’, in J. O'Neill (ed.), Sociology as a Skin Trade, London: Heinneman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, Lily and Christopher Dare: 1978, Secrets in the Family, New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, John: 1969, Why Am I Afraid to Tell You Who I Am?, Chicago: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, Francis: 1961, Secrecy and Publicity: Dilemmas of Democracy, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, Karl E.: 1979, Mirrors, Masks, Lies and Secrets, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard; 1978, The Fall of Public Man, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward A.: 1956, The Torment of Secrecy, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, Martin: 1964, Game Theory and Related Approaches to Social Behavior, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, Martin: 1975, Games for Society, Business and War: Toward a Theory of Gaming, New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg: 1950, ‘The Secret and the Secret Society’, in K. Wolff (ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, William: 1975, ‘Sociology's Models of Man: The Relationship of Models of Man to Sociological Explanation’, Three Sociological Theories, New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teft, Stanton K. (ed.): 1980, A Cross Cultural Perspective, New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W. and H. H. Kelley: 1959, The Social Psychology of Groups, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, Alain: 1971, The Post-Industrial Society, translated by F. X. Mayhew, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, Mark: 1981, ‘Uncertainty as a Root Metaphor in the Social Science’, Free Inquiry 9, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, Mark: 1985, ‘The Game Is the Thing: Marketing Marx Capitalistically’, Human Affairs 9, 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, Harold: 1967, Organizational Intelligence, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, Ruth C.: 1979, The Self-Concept: Theory and Research on Selected Topics, two volumes, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, Alvin: 1977, ‘Secrecy Within an Organization’, in A. Zander (ed.), Groups at Work, San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mark N. Wexler is Associate Professor of Business, Government and Society and a member of Simon Fraser's Strategic Studies Group. Dr. Wexler's recent publications can be found in three books and in such diverse periodicals as International Review of Social Science, Cornell Journal of Social Relations, Quarterly Journal of Ideology, Social Science Journal, Queen's Quarterly, Conflict Quarterly, Human Affairs, Free Inquiry, Humanist, Anthropology of Work Review, American Studies in Humor, Canadian Journal of Communications, Transformations, International Journal of Psychiatry, and others. Currently, Mark is International Editor of the Quarterly Journal of Ideology.

I would like to thank Kathryn Rayher for her able assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wexler, M.N. Conjectures on the dynamics of secrecy and the secrets business. J Bus Ethics 6, 469–480 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383289

Keywords

Navigation