Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the structure of ethical attributions as a component of the consumer decision model: The vicarious versus personal perspective

  • The Depaul University Workshop On Marketing Ethics
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The managerial ethics literature is used as a base for the inclusion of Ethical Attribution, as an element in the consumer's decision process. A situational model of ethical consideration in consumer behavior is proposed and examined for Personal vs. Vicarious effects. Using a path analytic approach, unique structures are reported for Personal and Vicarious situations in the evaluation of a seller's unethical behavior. An attributional paradigm is suggested to explain the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abratt, R. and D. Sacks: 1988, “The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible”, Journal of Business Ethics 7, pp. 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amitai, E.: 1988, The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, H. and M. J. Karson: 1987, “Personal Values and Business Decisions: An Exploratory Investigation”, Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. and N. E. Bowie: 1988, Ethical Theory and Business 3rd ed. (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J.: 1988, Essays on Ethics in Business and the Professions (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W.: 1975, “Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research 2, pp. 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltramini, R. F.: 1988, “Perceived Believability of Warning Label Information Presented in Cigarette Advertising”, Journal of Advertising 17, pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. and D. G. Bonett: 1980, “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Co-Variance Structures”, Psychological Bulletin 88, pp. 588–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. D., J. Moberg and M. Velasquez: 1981, “The Ethics of Organizational Politics”, Academy of Management Review 6, pp. 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. and J. Whalen: 1988, “The Personal and Academic Self-Concept Inventory: Factor Structure and Gender Differences in High School and College Samples”, working paper: Kellstadt Center for Market Analysis and Planning, DePaul University.

  • Fleming, J., Personal Interview, Northridge, CA, December 1988.

  • Fleming, J.: 1985, “An Index of Fit for Factor Scales”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 45, pp. 522–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. and B. Courtney: 1985, “Belief in a Difficult World: The Psychological Adjustment Component of Internal-Eternal Locus of Control”, Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research 6, pp. 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. H., W. J. Icks and R. F. Kidd (eds.): 1979, New Directions in Attribution Research 1, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics”, Journal of Macro-Marketing 6, pp. 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1959, “Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals”, translated by L. W. Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

  • Kelley, H. H.: 1972, “Causal Schemata and the Attribution Process”, in E. E. Jones Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Benavior (Morristown, NJ: General Learning Corporation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H.: 1967, “Attribution Theory in Social Psychology”, in E. E. Jones Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G.: 1987, “A Framework for Marketing Ethics”, Journal of Consumer Marketing (Fall), pp. 7–18.

  • Laczniak, G. and P. Murphy: 1985, Marketing Ethics: Guidelines for Managers (Lexington: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. and G. Laczniak: 1981, “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchers”, in B. M. Enis and K. J. Roering, (eds.) Review of Marketing Chicago: AMA, pp. 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phares, E. J.: 1968, “Differential Utilization of Information as a Function of Internal-External Control”, Journal of Personality 36, pp. 649–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, R. E. and R. E. Reidenbach: 1986, “Not all CEO's Are Created Equal as Advertising Spokespersons: Evaluating the Effective CEO Spokesperson”, Journal of Advertising 15, pp. 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G. and D. Stewart: 1983, “An Interaction Framework of Consumer Decision Making”, Journal of Consumer Behavior 10, pp. 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puto, C. P.: 1987, “The Framing of Buying Decisions”, Journal of Consumer Research 14, pp. 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: 1972, “Scale to Measure Internal versus Eternal Control”, in J. P. Robinson and P. R. Shaver (eds.) Measures of Social Psychological Attutudes, Survey Research Center: Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurr, P. H. and J. L. Ozanne: 1985, “Influences on Exchange Processes: Buyers' Preconceptions of a Seller's Trustworthiness and Bargaining Toughness”, Journal of Consumer Research 11, pp. 939–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. L. and J. C. Mowen: 1986, “Source Credibility: On the Independent Effects of Trust and Expertise”, Advances in Consumer Research 13, pp. 306–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Joel Whalen is an Assistant Professor of Marketing at DePaul University, Chicago. He has published articles in Psychology & Marketing, Journal of Business Research, and Journal of Business Ethics. His research has been published in the proceedings of the American Marketing Association's Micro-Computers in Marketing Conference; Atlantic Marketing Association; the American Marketing Association Conference on Culture and Sub-Cultural Influences; Northeast Decision Science Institute, Southern Marketing Association, and Decision Sciences Institute.

Robert E. Pitts, is Professor and Chair of the Department of Marketing and the Director of the Kellstadt Center for Marketing Analysis and Planning at DePaul University. He served as a member of the faculty of Jacksonville State University, the University of Notre Dame and the University of Mississippi. Dr. Pitts' research has appeared in numerous publications including the Journal of Marketing, Journal of Bank Research, Journal of Advertising, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing Education, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Social Psychology, Southern Economic Review, Journal of Travel Research, Journal of Behavioral Economics, The Mid-South Journal of Economics, Psychology and Marketing, Marketing and Media Decisions and Journal of Insurance Issues and Practices. Dr. Pitts is the editor of Personal Values and Consumer Psychology (Lexington Publishers, and co-author of Bank Marketing, A Guide to Strategic Planning, and Effective Bank Marketing Issues, Techniques and Application. Over the past decade, Dr. Pitts has served as a consultant to such firms as General Motors Corporation, Congolium Corp-Kinder Division, National Standard Steel Corp, WalMart Corp Training Programs, Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and Council of State Chambers of Commerce.

John K. Wong teaches International Marketing Management and Consumer Behavior at DePaul University. He served as a member of the faculty of the University of Missouri at Columbia and Washington State University. Dr. Wong's research has appeared in numerous publications including the International Marketing Review, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, International Journal of Bank Marketing and the proceedings of the American Marketing Association, Association for Consumer Research, Academy of Marketing Science, Academy of International Business and Pan-Pacific Business Association.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whalen, J., Pitts, R.E. & Wong, J.K. Exploring the structure of ethical attributions as a component of the consumer decision model: The vicarious versus personal perspective. J Bus Ethics 10, 285–293 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382967

Keywords

Navigation