Abstract
The rationale clause infinitive is a modifier of the verb which expresses an agent's intention in acting as they do. The rationale clause is related to the matrix in two important ways: the null subject of the infinitive (PRO) is usually coreferential with a phrase in the matrix (control), and the intention it expresses is usually assigned to a phrase in the matrix (predication). Given that the controller and argument of the rationale clause are usually clausemates of the infinitive itself, the strongest hypothesis is that both control and predication are strictly local. However, there has been much debate in the literature concerning the viability of such a locality constraint. In this article, I argue in favour of a locality-based account of control and predication in the rationale clause, comparing it with a discourse-semantic constraint approach and a logophoricity constraint approach. Data from two related modifier infinitives (the purpose clause and the telic clause) will be used to sharpen the discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bach, E.: 1982, 'Purpose Clauses and Control', in P. I. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pp. 35–57, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Bresnan, J.: 1982, 'Control and Complementation', Linguistic Inquiry 13, 343–434.
Browning, M.: 1987, Null Operator Constructions, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Chierchia, G.: 1989, 'Structured Meanings, Thematic Roles, and Control', in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee and R. Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meanings, vol. 2, pp. 131–166, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N.: 1977, 'On Wh-movement', in P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, pp. 71–132, Academic Press, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N.: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Davidson, D.: 1967, 'The Logical Form of Action Sentences', in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Epstein, S. D., E. M. Groat, R. Kawashima and H. Kitahara: 1998, A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations, Oxford University Press, New York.
Faraci, R.: 1974, Aspects of the Grammar of Infinitives and For-phrases, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Farkas, D.: 1988, 'On Obligatory Control', Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 27–58.
Grimshaw, J.: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Hegarty, M.: 1989, 'An Analysis of Null Operators in English', unpublished manuscript, MIT.
Higginbotham, J.: 1983, 'The Logic of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics', Journal of Philosophy 80, 100–127.
Higginbotham, J.: 1985, 'On Semantics', Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.
Higginbotham, J.: 1989, 'Elucidations of Meaning', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 465–517.
Jones, C.: 1991, Purpose Clauses: Syntax, Thematics, and Semantics of English Purpose Constructions, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Kirkpatrick, C.: 1982, 'The Transitive Purpose Clause in English', Texas Linguistic Forum 19, 99–123.
Kratzer, A.: 1994, 'On External Arguments', in E. Benedicto and J. Runner (eds.), Functional Projections (UMOP17), GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.
Kratzer, A.: 1996a, The Semantics of Inflectional Heads (course materials), International Summer School in Linguistics, Girona, Spain.
Kratzer, A.: 1996b, 'Severing the External Argument from Its Verb', in J. Rooryck and L.A. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Landau, I.: 2000, Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 51), Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Lasnik, H.: 1988, 'Subjects and the Theta-Criterion', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 1–17.
Lewis, D.: 1975, 'Adverbs of Quantification', in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 3–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Maling, J.: 1984, 'Non-Clause-Bound Reflexives in Modern Icelandic', Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 211–241.
Manzini, R.: 1983, 'On Control and Control Theory', Linguistic Inquiry 14, 421–446.
Minkoff, S.: 1994, How Some So-called “Thematic Roles” That Select Animate Arguments Are Generated, and How These Roles Inform Binding and Control, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Montague, R.: 1974, Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Parsons, T.: 1989, 'The Progressive in English: Events, States and Processes', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 213–241.
Parsons, T.: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Pustejovsky, J.: 1995, The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Ramchand, G. C.: 1997, Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Roeper, T.: 1987, 'Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation', Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267–310.
Schein, B.: 1993, Plurals and Events, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Sells, P.: 1987, 'Aspects of Logophoricity', Linguistic Inquiry 18, 445–479.
Sigurð sson, H. A.: 1990, 'Long Distance Reflexives and Moods in Icelandic', in J. Maling and A. Zaenen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 24: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 309–346, Academic Press, San Diego.
Thráinsson, H.: 1976, 'Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic', in A. Ford, J. Reighard, R. Singh (eds.), Papers from the Sixth Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 225–239, McGill University, Université de Montréal and Université de Quebec á Montreal.
Thráinsson, H.: 1990, 'A Semantic Reflexive in Icelandic', in J. Maling and A. Zaenen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 24: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 289–307, Academic Press, San Diego.
Whelpton, M.: 1995, The Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives of Result in English, PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
Whelpton, M.: 1999a, 'More Arguments for Modifier Infinitives', in C. Clarady (ed.), Texas Linguistics Forum 40, pp. 185–199, The University of Texas, Austin.
Whelpton, M.: 1999b, 'The Resumptive Infinitive', Pronominal Binding and Control', in H. Hoshi and F. D. Gobbo (eds.), University of California at Irvine Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 5, ILSA, University of California at Irvine.
Whelpton, M.: 2000a, 'Locality at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: Control and Predication in the Rationale Clause', in N. M. Antrim and G. Goodall (eds.), Proceedings of Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) 11, pp. 508–521, California State University, Fresno
Whelpton, M.: 2000b, 'A Peripheral Modifier Infinitive: Sub-, Ad-, or Con-junction?', in R. Ai, F. D. Gobbo, M. Irie and H. Ono (eds.), University of California at Irvine Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 6, pp. 115–140, ILSA, University of California at Irvine.
Whelpton, M.: 2001a, 'Elucidation of a Telic Infinitive', Journal of Linguistics 37, 313–337.
Whelpton, M.: 2001b, 'Modification at a Difficult Juncture: A Factive Infinitive in English', Generative Grammar in Geneva 2, pp. 87–105. Published on-line at http://www.unige.ch/ lettres/syntaxe/journal/index.html.
Wilder, C.: 1989, 'Predication, Null Operator Infinitives and for-Deletion.' UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 207–233, University College, London.
Williams, E.: 1974, Rule Ordering in Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Williams, E.: 1985, 'PRO and Subject of NP', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 297–315.
Williams, E.: 1992, 'Adjunct Control', in R. K. Larson (ed.), Control and Grammar, pp. 297–321, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Williams, E.: 1994, Thematic Structure in Syntax (LI Monograph 23), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whelpton, M. Locality and Control with Infinitives of Result. Natural Language Semantics 10, 167–210 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022107429786
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022107429786