Abstract
Health defined as the psychophysiological capacity to act or respond appropriately in a wide variety of situations, is enhanced by many means other than preventing and treating disease and injury. Therefore no choice of a particular medical intervention is likely to maximize health for all people with (or at risk for) a given disease. As a result, if medical practitioners are to be fully competent in the sense of knowing not only how to perform procedures but when and when not to do so, they must be able to support patients (and those who know and care about them) in weighing all of the many factors which bear upon the decision as to which, if any, medical interventions are likely to improve the person's health.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engelhardt, H. T., Jr., ‘Is There a philosophy of medicine?’, inPSA 1976, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, 1977, pp. 94–108.
Rich, A.,Of Woman Born, W. W. Norton & Co., New York, 1976.
Thomasma, D. C., and Pellegrino, E. D., ‘Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’, this issue.
Whitbeck, C., ‘Four basic concepts of medical science’, inPSA 1978, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 210–222.
Whitbeck, C., ‘A theory of health’, in A. Caplanet al. (eds.),Concepts of Health and Disease in Medicine, Addison-Wesley, Boston, forthcoming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am indebted to Edmund Erde for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitbeck, C. On the aims of medicine: Comments on ‘philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’. Metamedicine 2, 35–41 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00886344
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00886344