Skip to main content
Log in

Two fallacious objections to Adams' soft/hard fact distinction

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Adams, Marilyn: 1967, ‘Is the Existence of God a ‘Hard Fact’’, The Philosophical Review 76, 492–503.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer, John Martin: 1983, ‘Freedom and Foreknowledge’, The Philosophical Review 92, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, John Martin: 1986, ‘Hard-Type Soft Facts’, The Philosophical Review 94, 591–601.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman, Joshua and Rosenkrantz, Gary: 1984, ‘Hard Facts and Soft Facts’, The Philosophical Review 93, 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newton-Smith, W. H.: 1980, The Structure of Time (Routledge and Kegan Paul).

  6. Pike, Nelson: 1966, ‘Of God and Freedom: A Rejoinder’, The Philosophical Review 75, 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prior, A. N.: 1968, ‘On the Logic of Ending Time’, in Papers on Time and Tense (Oxford University Press) pp. 98–115.

  8. Smith, Quentin: 1985, ‘On the Beginning of Time’, Noûs, 19, 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Widerker, D. Two fallacious objections to Adams' soft/hard fact distinction. Philosophical Studies 57, 103–107 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355665

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355665

Navigation