Abstract
This article explores the role of contract law inintimate relationships, focussing on tacit or onlypartially express agreements rather than expressprenuptial or cohabitation contracts. It welcomes theembrace of relational contract theory by feminist andgay and lesbian commentators, but argues that keydifferences between commercial and intimaterelationships need further analysis if the potentialof relational theory in cases of informal agreement isto be realised. The first difference is that,while commercial contracts can draw on the context ofa contracting community as a source of norms to fillgaps in agreement, there is no equivalent source ofnorms for intimate relationships. The seconddifference is that, although relational theory entailsthe attenuation of self interest in commercialcontracts, in intimate relationships the sense inwhich self interest is attenuated is quite different,with the result that concepts such as cooperation andaltruism have different meanings. The result of thesedifferences is that, in some intimate relationships,there will be informal understandings falling short ofbargain, which will be unenforceable – under bothorthodox contract law and more relationalinterpretations of it. It is argued that many suchinformal agreements are distinguishable from mostgratuitous promises because they are characterised bya degree of reciprocity between the parties. Thepossibility of the law of contract recognising suchnon bargain agreements based on reciprocity isexplored, and it is argued that the enforcement ofsuch agreements represents a less distorting legalresponse than that available through the use ofpromissory estoppel.
REFERENCES
Adams, J. and Brownsword, R., “The Ideologies of Contract”, Legal Studies 7 (1987), 205.
Atiyah, P.S., The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).
Atiyah, P.S., An Introduction to the Law of Contract (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Beale, H. and Dugdale, T., “Contracts Between Businessmen: Planning and the Use of Contractual Remedies”, British Journal of Law and Society 2 (1975), 45.
Birks, P., An Introduction to the Law of Restitution (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).
Bix, B., “Bargaining in the Shadow of Love: The Enforcement of Premarital Agreements and How We Think about Love”, William and Mary Law Rev 40 (1998), 145.
Bottomley, A., “Women and Trust(s): Portraying the Family in the Gallery of Law”, in Land Law: Themes and Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Brown, B., “Contracting In/Contracting Out: Some Feminist Considerations”, in Feminist Perspectives on the Foundational Subjects of Law, ed. A. Bottomley (London: Cavendish, 1996).
Campbell, D., “The Relational Constitution of the Discrete Contract”, in Contract and Economic Organisation ed D. Campbell and P. Vincent Jones (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996).
Christensen, C.W., “Legal Ordering of Family Values: the Case of Lesbian and Gay Families”, Cardozo Law Review 18 (1997), 1299.
Collins, H., The Law of Contract (London: Butterworths, 1997).
Collins, H., “Competing Norms of Contractual Behaviour”, in Contract and Economic Organisation, ed. D. Campbell and P. Vincent Jones (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996)
Dalton, C., “Deconstructing Contract Doctrine”, Yale Law Journal (1985), 997.
Ellman, I.M., “The Theory of Alimony”, California Law Review 77 (1989), 1.
Ertman, M.M., “Sexuality: Contractual Purgatory for Sexual Minorities: Not Heaven But Not Hell Either”, Denver University Law Review 73 (1996), 1107.
Feinman, J., “Critical Approaches to Contract Law”, UCLA Law Rev 30 (1983), 829.
Flynn, L. and Lawson, A., “Gender, Sexuality, and the Doctrine of Detrimental Reliance”, Feminist Legal Studies 3 (1995), 105.
Freeman, M.D.R., “Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited”, in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996).
Frug, M.J. “Re-reading Contracts: A Feminist Analysis of a Contracts Casebook”, American Univ Law Rev 34 (1985), 1065.
Frug, M.J., “Rescuing Impossibility Doctrine: A Postmodern Feminist Analysis of Contract Law”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140 (1992), 1029.
Gardner, S., “Rethinking Family Property”, Law Quarterly Review 109 (1993), 263.
Gilligan C., In a Different Voice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982).
Glover, N. and Todd, P., “The Myth of Common Intention”, Legal Studies 16 (1996), 325.
Goodrich, P., “Gender and Contracts”, in Feminist Perspectives on the Foundational Subjects of Law, ed. A. Bottomley (London: Cavendish, 1996).
Gordon, K., “The Necessity and Enforcement of Cohabitation Agreements: When Strings will Attach and how to Prevent Them”, Brandeis Law Journal 37 (1998), 245.
Gray, K.J., Elements of Land Law (London: Butterworths, 1993).
Henderson, “Promissory Estoppel and Traditional Contract Doctrine”, Yale L J 76 (1969), 342.
Horsburgh, B., “Redefining the Family: Recognising the Altruistic Caretaker and the Importance of Relational Needs”, U. Michigan J L 25 (1992), 435.
Hviid, M., “Relational Contracts and Repeated Games”, in Contract and Economic Organisation, ed. D. Campbell and P. Vincent Jones (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996).
Kandoian, E., “Cohabitation, Common Law Marriage and the Possibility of a Shared Moral Life”, Georgia Law Journal 75 (1987), 1829.
Kennedy, D., “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication”, Harvard Law Review 89 (1976), 1685.
Kingdom, “Cohabitation Contracts-a Socialist-Feminist Issue”, Journal of Law and Society 15 (1988), 77 E.
Macaulay, S., “Non-contractual Relations in Business”, American Sociological Review 28 (1963), 55.
Macaulay, S., “An Empirical View of Contract”, Wisconsin Law Review (1985), 561.
Macneil, I.R., “The Many Futures of Contract”, University of Southern California Law Review 47 (1974), 691.
Macneil, I.R., “Adjustments of Long-Term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law”, Northwestern University Law Review 72 (1978) 854.
Macneil, I.R., The New Social Contract (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980).
Macneil, I.R., “Economic Analysis of Contractual Relations: Its Shortfalls and the Need for a 'Rich Classificatory Apparatus' ”, Northwestern University Law Review 75 (1981), 1018.
Macneil, I.R. “Efficient Breach of Contract: Circles in the Sky”, Virginia Law Review 68 (1982), 947.
Macneil, I.R., “Values in Contract: Internal and External”, Northwestern University Law Review 78 (1983), 340.
Macneil, I.R., “Contract Remedies: The Need for a Better Efficiency Analysis”, Journal Institutional and Theoretical Economics 144 (1988), 6.
Millbank, J., “An Implied Promise to Parent: Lesbian Families, Litigation, and W v. G”, Australian Journal of Family Law 10 (1996), 15.
Neave, M., “Private Ordering in Family Law-Will Women Benefit?”, in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1995).
O'Donovan, K., Sexual Divisions in Law (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1985).
Olsen, F.E., “The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Law Reform”, Harvard Law Review 96 (1983), 1497.
Pateman, C., The Sexual Contract (London: Polity, 1988).
Patterson, D., “The Pseudo Debate Over Default Rules in Contract Law ”, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 3 (1993), 236.
Robson, R., Lesbian (Out)Law: Survival Under the Rule of Law (1992).
Robson, R. and Valentine, S.E., “Lov(h)ers: Lesbians as Intimate Partners and Lesbian Legal Theory”, Temp Law Review 63 (1990), 511.
Selznick, P., Law, Society, and Industrial Justice (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969).
Schultz, M.M., “The Gendered Curriculum: Of Contracts and Careers”, Iowa Law Review (1991), 55.
Schultz, M., “Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy”, California Law Review 70 (1982), 204.
Testy, K.Y., “An Unlikely Resurrection”, North Western University Law Review 90 (1995), 219.
Tidwell, P.A. and Linzer, P., “The Flesh Coloured Band Aid-Contracts, Feminism, Dialogue and Norms”, Houston Law Review 28 (1991), 791.
Weisbrod, C., “The Way We Live Now: A Discussion of Contracts and Domestic Arrangements”, Utah Law Rev (1994), 777.
Weitzman, L., The Marriage Contract (New York: Free Press, 1981).
Whitford, W.C., “Ian Macneil's Contribution to Contract Scholarship”, Wisconsin Law Review (1985), 545.
Wightman, J., Contract: A Critical Commentary (London: Pluto, 1996).
Wightman, J., “Good Faith and Pluralism in the Law of Contract”, Good Faith in Contract: Concept and Context, in ed. R. Brownsword, N. Hird and G. Howells (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999).
Zimmerman, R., The Law of Obligations (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wightman, J. Intimate Relationships, Relational Contract Theory, and the Reach of Contract. Feminist Legal Studies 8, 93–131 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009252419410
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009252419410