Abstract
This manuscript investigates the role of argumentative competence in interpersonal dyadic exchanges. Specifically, this study examined the two sub-dimensions of competence, argumentative effectiveness and appropriateness, and their connections with argumentative traits, situational features, and argument satisfaction. In addition, self-perceived versus observed argumentative competence were compared. Participants in the study (N = 282, 141 dyads) completed measures before and after a face-to-face argumentative discussion with another person about one of two possible topics (student athlete pay and texting while driving). Results revealed that argumentation traits had little effect on argumentative competence, but competence was predicted by one’s knowledge about the topic. Argument satisfaction depended only on arguers’ own competence, not their partners’. Finally, a perceptual bias existed regarding argument effectiveness (but not appropriateness) in that participants rated themselves higher than did observers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, R.A., T. Ledermann, and D.A. Kenny. 2018. APIM power [Online program]. Retrieved from https://robert-ackerman.shinyapps.io/APIMPowerR/. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
Avtgis, T.A., and P.E. Madlock. 2008. Implications of the verbally aggressive patient: Creating a constructive environment in destructive situations. In Applied communication for health professionals, ed. E.P. Polack, V.P. Richmond, and J.C. McCroskey, 167–184. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Bandura, A. 1989. Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist 44: 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.
Beatty, M.J., J.A. Dobos, K.M. Valencic, and J.E. Rudd. 1998, November. A preliminary investigation into the unexplored “dark side” of communication avoidance: Indirect interpersonal aggressiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association conference, New York, NY.
Benoit, W.L. 1987. Argumentation and credibility appeals in persuasion. Southern Journal of Communication 5: 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948709372687.
Bishop, S.C., P.S. Hill, and Y. Lin. 2012. Use of aggressive humor: Aggressive humor style, verbal aggressiveness and social dominance orientation. Ohio Communication Journal 50: 73–82.
Boster, F.L., T. Levine, and D. Kazoleas. 1993. The impact of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness on strategic diversity and persistence in compliance-gaining behavior. Communication Quarterly 41: 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369901.
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canary, D.J., J.E. Brossmann, B.G. Brossman, and H. Weger Jr. 1995. Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode-specific effects of argument structures. Communication Monographs 62: 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376357.
Canary, D.J., and B.H. Spitzberg. 1987. Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research 14: 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00123.x.
Canary, D.J., and B.H. Spitzberg. 1990. Attribution biases and associations between conflict strategies and competence outcomes. Communications Monographs 57: 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376191.
Christensen, A., and C.L. Heavey. 1990. Gender and social structure in demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73.
Cionea, I.A., A.S. Richards, and S.K. Straub. 2017. Factors predicting the intent to engage in arguments in close relationships: A revised model. Argumentation 31: 121–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9400-z.
Cohen, J. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112: 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
Cook, W.L., and D.A. Kenny. 2005. The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29: 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405.
Copstead, G.J., C.N. Lanzetta, and T.A. Avtgis. 2001. Adult children conflict control expectancies: Effects on aggressive communication toward parents. Communication Research Reports 18: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090109384784.
Croucher, S.M., R. Braziunaite, D. Homsey, G. Pillai, J. Saxena, A. Saldanha, V. Joshi, I. Jafri, P. Choudhary, L. Bose, and K. Agarwal. 2009. Organizational dissent and argumentativeness: A comparative analysis between American and Indian organization. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 38: 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2009.505057.
Cupach, W.R. 1982, May. Communication satisfaction and interpersonal solidarity as outcomes of conflict message strategy use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED217510.pdf. Retrieved 30 Dec 2019.
Dallinger, J.M., and D. Hample. 2002. The image of the ideal arguer. In Arguing communication and culture, ed. G.T. Goodnight, 285–291. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Duran, R.L., and B.H. Spitzberg. 1995. Toward the development and validation of a measure of cognitive communication competence. Communication Quarterly 43: 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379509369976.
Ehrlinger, J., T. Gilovich, and L. Ross. 2005. Peering into the bias blind spot: People’s assessments of bias in themselves and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 680–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271570.
Gonzalez, R., and D. Griffin. 2000. On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In The social psychology of personal relationships. 3rd ed, ed. W. Ickes and S. Duck, 181–213. New York, NY: Wiley.
Gross, M.A., and L.K. Guerrero. 2000. Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim’s organizational conflict styles. International Journal of Conflict Management 11: 200–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022840.
Hamilton, M.A., and P.J. Mineo. 2002. Argumentativeness and its effect on verbal aggressiveness: A meta-analytic review. In Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis, ed. M. Allen, R.W. Preiss, B.M. Gayle, and N. Burell, 281–314. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hample, D. 2002. Inventional capacity. International society for the study of argumentation proceedings. Retrieved from http://rozenbergquarterly.com/issa-proceedings-2002-inventional-capacity/?print=pdf. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
Hample, D. 2005. Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hample, D., and J.M. Dallinger. 1987. Individual differences in cognitive editing standards. Human Communication Research 14: 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00124.x.
Hmielowski, J.D., M.J. Hutchens, and V.J. Cicchirillo. 2014. Living in an age of online incivility: Examining the conditional indirect effects of online discussions on political flaming. Information, Communication, & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.899609.
Infante, D.A. 1987. Aggressiveness. In Personality and interpersonal communication, ed. J.C. McCroskey and J.A. Daly, 157–192. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Infante, D.A., T.A. Chandler, and J. Rudd. 1989. Test of an argumentative skill deficiency model of interspousal violence. Communication Monographs 56: 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390257.
Infante, D.A., C. Heinen Wall, C.J. Leap, and K. Danielson. 1984a. Verbal aggression as a function of the receiver’s argumentativeness. Communication Research Reports 1: 33–37.
Infante, D.A., and A.S. Rancer. 1982. A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment 46: 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13.
Infante, D.A., A.S. Rancer, and T.A. Avtgis. 2010. Contemporary communication theory. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Infante, D.A., J.D. Trebing, P.E. Shepherd, and D.E. Seeds. 1984b. The relationship of argumentativeness to verbal aggression. Southern Communication Journal 50: 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948409372622.
Infante, D.A., and C.J. Wigley III. 1986. Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs 53: 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126.
Jones, E., and R. Nisbett. 1971. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
Johnson, A.J., J.M. Averbeck, K.M. Kelley, and S. Liu. 2010. Serial arguments and argument type: Comparing serial arguments about public and personal issue argument topics. In The functions of argument and social context: Selected papers from the 16th biennial conference on argumentation, ed. D.S. Gouran, 211–218. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Johnson, A.J., J.A.H. Becker, S. Wigley, M.M. Haigh, and E.A. Craig. 2007. Reported argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness levels: The influence of type of argument. Communication Studies 58: 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701341154.
Johnson, K.L., and M.E. Roloff. 1998. Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research 25: 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025003004.
Kenny, D. A. 2015. An interactive tool for the estimation and testing the Actor–partner Interdependence Model using multilevel modeling [Computer software]. https://davidakenny.shinyapps.io/APIM_MM/. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
Kenny, D.A., D.A. Kashy, and W.L. Cook. 2006. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
Kenny, D.A., and T.V. West. 2010. Similarity and agreement in self-and other perception: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14: 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353414.
Kotowski, M.R., T.R. Levine, C.R. Baker, and J.M. Bolt. 2009. A multitrait-multimethod validity assessment of the verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness scales. Communication Monographs 76: 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903300247.
Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
Levine, T.R., M.J. Beatty, S. Limon, M.A. Hamilton, R. Buck, and R.M. Chroy-Asad. 2004. The dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. Communication Monographs 71: 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299911.
Levine, T.R., and F.J. Boster. 1996. The impact of self and others’ argumentativeness on talk about controversial issues. Communication Quarterly 44: 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370022.
Levine, T.R., M.R. Kotowski, M.J. Beatty, and M.J. Van Kelegom. 2012. A meta-analysis of trait-behavior correlations in argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31: 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11425037.
Martin, M.M., and C.M. Anderson. 1995. Roommate similarities: Are roommates who are similar in their communication traits more satisfied? Communication Research Reports 12: 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099509362038.
McCroskey, J.C., and L.L. McCroskey. 1988. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports 5: 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359810.
McEwan, B. 2013. Sharing, caring, and surveilling: An actor–partner interdependence model examination of Facebook relational maintenance strategies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16: 863–869. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0717.
Mongeau, P.A. 1989. Individual differences as moderators of persuasive message processing and attitude-behavior relations. Communication Research Reports 6: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098909359825.
National Association of Colleges and Employers. 2018. Job outlook 2018. Retrieved from https://www.naceweb.org/store/2017/job-outlook-2018/. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
Nickerson, R.S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2: 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
Nicotera, A.M., J. Steele, A. Catalani, and N. Simpson. 2012. Conceptualization and test of an aggressive competence model. Communication Research Reports 29: 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.639909.
Onyekwere, E.O., R.B. Rubin, and D.A. Infante. 1991. Interpersonal perception and communication satisfaction as a function of argumentativeness and ego-involvement. Communication Quarterly 39: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379109369781.
Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Pronin, E., T. Gilovich, and L. Ross. 2004. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review 111: 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781.
Rancer, A.S., and T.A. Avtgis. 2014. Argumentative and aggressive communication: Theory, research, and application. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Rapanta, C., M. Garcia-Mila, and S. Gilabert. 2013. What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research 83: 483–520. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313487606.
Roper, R., A.J. Johnson, and E.N. Bostwick. 2017. A target’s perspective: Verbal aggressiveness, coping strategies, and relational harm. Communication Research Reports 34: 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1230544.
Semic, B.A., and D.J. Canary. 1997. Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions. Communication Quarterly 45: 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379709370071.
Spitzberg, B.H. 1983. Communication competence as knowledge, skill, and impression. Communication Education 32: 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528309378550.
Spitzberg, B.H. 2009. Interpersonal communication competence and social skills. In International encyclopedia of communication, ed. W. Donsbach, 2486–2492. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spitzberg, B.H., and W.R. Cupach. 1984. Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Spitzberg, B.H., and W.R. Cupach. 2011. Interpersonal skills. In The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication. 4th ed, ed. M.L. Knapp and J.A. Daly, 481–524. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Trapp, R., J. Yingling, and J. Wanner. 1987. Measuring argumentative competence. In Argumentation: Across the lines of discipline, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair, and C.A. Willard, 253–261. Dordrecht: Foris.
Willard, N.E. 2007. Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Zakahi, W.R., and R.L. Duran. 1984. Attraction, communicative competence and communication satisfaction. Communication Research Reports 1: 54–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Standard
All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cionea, I.A., Piercy, C.W., Bostwick, E.N. et al. Argumentative Competence in Friend and Stranger Dyadic Exchanges. Argumentation 33, 465–487 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09487-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09487-x