Skip to main content
Log in

Academic Misconduct among Business Students: A Comparison of the US and UAE

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of 345 undergraduate business students from a medium-sized southeastern regional university and 164 undergraduates from a medium-sized university in the United Arab Emirates found that 71 % of all respondents admitted to academic misconduct in a recent 1-year period, a percentage similar to McCabe’s (2005) finding that an average of 70 % of undergraduate students admitted to recent academic misconduct. Business students from the Middle East were significantly less likely to perceive various academic misconduct behaviors as forms of serious cheating compared to business students from the US. Hofstede’s (2001) cultural dimension of individualism/collectivism and Ajzen’s (Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211, 1991) theory of planned behavior are discussed as likely explanations of reported academic misconduct differences between the two countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In addition to country (culture), the data were examined to determine if other demographic factors (e.g., age, class—freshman, sophomore, junior, senior—gender, etc.) significantly affected the likelihood of self-reporting of academic misconduct. No significant demographic differences were uncovered and as such demographic variables are not included in this paper.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the School, 17, 512–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blachnio, A., & Weremko, M. (2011). Academic cheating is contagious: the influence of the presence of others on honesty, a study report. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broeckelman-Post, M. A. (2009). Building a culture of academic integrity: The role of communication in creating and changing understandings and enactments of academic integrity, Unpublished doctoral dissertation at Ohio University, 571.

  • Chapman, K. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2004). Academic dishonesty in a global educational market: a comparison of Hong Kong and American university business students. International Journal of Education Management, 18, 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Hughes, J., & McCabe, D. (2006). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P. M. J., Kwon, I. G., Stoeberl, P. A., & Baumhart, R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, P. A. (2006). Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it. College Teaching, 54, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. A., Levenburg, N. M., McKendall, M., & Mothersell, W. (2007). Cheating during the college years: how do business school students compare? Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2003). Spring semester Kansas State University Academic Dishonesty survey study. Retrieved September 17, 2011, from http://www.k-state.edu/honor/researchlinks/mccabesurvey2003/survey03.htm

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Cheating among business students: a challenge for business leaders and educators. Journal of Management Education, 19, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49, 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, S. H. (1992). Responding to plagiarism: the role of the WPA. Writing Program Administration, 15, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I. (2004). An open letter to the deans and faculties of American business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubaum, D. O., Pagell, M., Drexler, J. A., McKee-Ryan, F. M., & Larson, E. (2009). Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes toward profits: an empirical response to critics. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payan, J., Reardon, J., & McCorkle, D. E. (2010). The effect of culture on the academic honesty of marketing and business students. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger, D. A., & Jordan, A. E. (2005). The relations among religion, motivation, and college cheating: a natural experiment. Ethics & Behavior, 15, 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). August. Predicting academic dishonesty: Theory of planned behavior and personality. Proceedings of the 2007 Management Education Division of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada.

  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., & Hayes, L. A. (2005). Hofstede theory and cross cultural ethics conceptualization, review and research agenda. Journal of the American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 6, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., Rawwas, M., & Al-Khatib, J. (2004). Ethical beliefs and orientations of a micro-culture in the U.S. International Business Review, 13, 661–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse, T., & Getachew, K. (2010). An exploration of undergraduate students’ self-reported academic dishonesty at Addis Ababa and Jimma Universities. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences., 5, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2003). Combating academic fraud towards a culture of integrity. Published by International Institute for Educational Planning. Retrieved December 26, 2012, from Web site: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133038e.pdf.

  • Williams, S.; Beard, J.; & Tanner, M. 2011 Coping with Millennials on Campus. BizEd, July/August 2011: 42–49.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, S., Tanner, M., Beard, J. et al. Academic Misconduct among Business Students: A Comparison of the US and UAE. J Acad Ethics 12, 65–73 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9200-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9200-0

Keywords

Navigation