Abstract
Species are thought by many to be important units of evolution. In this paper, I argue against that view. My argument is based on an examination of the role of species in the synthetic theory of evolution. I argue that if one adopts a gradualist view of evolution, one cannot make sense of the claim that species are “units” in the minimal sense needed to claim that they are units of evolution, namely, that they exist as discrete entities over time. My second argument is directed against an appeal to Eldredge and Gould's theory of punctuated equilibria to support the claim that species are units of evolution. If one adopts their view, it may be possible to identify discrete temporal entities that can plausibly be termed ‘species’, but there is no reason to claim that those entities are “units of evolution”. Thus, on two plausible interpretations of the role of natural selection in the process of evolution, species are of no special importance. I then consider some of the reasons why species have been thought to be important evolutionary units by many contemporary evolutionary biologists. Finally, I discuss briefly the implications of this conclusion for evolutionary biology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty, J.: 1985, ‘Speaking of Species: Darwin's Strategy’, in D. Kohn, ed.,The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Brandon, R.N.: 1990,Adaptation and Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Darwin, C.: [1859] 1964,On the Origin of Species, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Dobzhansky, T.: 1937,Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.
Dobzhansky, T.: 1973. ‘Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution’,American Biology Teacher 35, 125–129.
Ehrlich, P.R. and J. Roughgarden: 1987,The Science of Ecology, Macmillan, New York.
Eldredge, N.: 1985,Unfinished Synthesis, Oxford University Press, New York.
Eldredge, N. and S.J. Gould: 1972, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism’, in T.J.M. Schopf, ed.,Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 82–115.
Endler, J.A.: 1986,Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Hanson, E.D.: 1981,Understanding Evolution, Oxford University Press, New York.
Hull, D.L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’,Systematic Zoology 25, 174–91.
Hull, D.L.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–60.
Hull, D.L.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’,Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.
Lamarck, J.B.: [1809] 1984,Zoological Philosophy, trans. H. Elliot,University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lewontin, R.C.: 1978, ‘Adaptation’,Scientific American 239, 212–230.
Mayr, E.: 1942,Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.
Mayr, E.: 1963,Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mayr, E.: 1970,Populations, Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mayr, E.: [1954] 1976, ‘Darwin and Isolation’ inEvolution and the Diversity of Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 120–128.
Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mishler, B.D. and R.N. Brandon: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 397–414.
Roughgarden, J.: 1979,Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction, Macmillan, New York.
Simpson, G.G.: 1944,Tempo and Mode in Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.
Simpson, G.G.: 1961,Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
Sulloway, F.: 1979, ‘Geographic Isolation in Darwin's Thinking: The Vicissitudes of a Crucial Idea’,Studies in History of Biology 3, 23–65.
Van Valen, L.: 1976, ‘Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks’,Taxon 25, 233–9.
Wiley, E.O.: 1978, ‘The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered’,Systematic Zoology 27, 17–26.
Wilson, B.E.: 1995, ‘A (Not-so-radical) Solution to the Species Problem’,Biology and Philosophy 10, 339–356.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, B.E. Changing conceptions of species. Biol Philos 11, 405–420 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128789
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128789