Abstract
In this paper I explore the pedagogical and political shift marked by the meaning and practice of diversity offered through New Labour education policy texts, specifically, the policy and practice of personalized learning (or personalization). The aim of this paper is to map the ways in which diversity relays and mobilizes a set of neoliberal positions and relationships in the field of education and seeks to govern education institutions and education users through politically circulating norms and values. These norms and values, I want to argue, echo and redeem the kinds of frameworks, applications and rationalities typically aligned with modes of neoliberal or advanced liberal governance, e.g. marketization, monetarization, atomization and deregulation. I conclude the paper by considering how diversity in education renders problematic conventional antinomies of the citizen and consumer, public and private, state and civil society, etc., and forces us to confront the rhizomatic character of contemporary governance and education in the era of neoliberalism.
[1] Ball, S. J. (2008). The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press. Search in Google Scholar
[2] Clarke, J., Newman, J. (1997). The Managerial State. London: Sage. Search in Google Scholar
[3] Department of Education and Science (DES) (1988). Education Reform Act. London: HMSO. Search in Google Scholar
[4] Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) (2001). Schools Building on Success. London: HMSO. Search in Google Scholar
[5] Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2004). Five Year Strategy for Children and Learners. London: HMSO. Search in Google Scholar
[6] Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2005). Higher Standards, Better Schools for All. London: HMSO. Search in Google Scholar
[7] Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2006). 2020 Vision. Report of the Teaching and Learning in 2020 Review Group. London: HMSO. Search in Google Scholar
[8] Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[9] Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy. Studies in Political Economy 40, 7–39. Search in Google Scholar
[10] Johansson, H., Hvinden, B. (2005). Welfare Governance and the Remaking of Citizenship. In J. Newman (Ed.). Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. University of Bristol, Bristol: Policy Press. Search in Google Scholar
[11] Jones, K. (2003). Education in Britain: 1944 to the Present. Cambridge: Polity Press. Search in Google Scholar
[12] Leadbeater, C. (2004). Participation through Personalisation. London: Demos. Search in Google Scholar
[13] Leadbeater, C. (2006). The Future of Public Services: Personalised Learning. In OECD Schooling for Tomorrow. Personalised Education. Paris: OECD Publications. Search in Google Scholar
[14] Miliband, D. (2006). Choice and Voice in Personalised Learning. In OECD Schooling for Tomorrow. Personalised Education. Paris: OECD Publications. Search in Google Scholar
[15] Modood, T. (2010). Still Not Easy Being British: Struggles for a Multicultural Citizenship. London: Trentham Books. Search in Google Scholar
[16] Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856Search in Google Scholar
[17] Wilkins, A. (2012a). The Spectre of Neoliberalism: Pedagogy, Gender and the Construction of Learner Identities. Critical Studies in Education. Forthcoming. Search in Google Scholar
[18] Wilkins, A. (2012b). Push and Pull in the Classroom: Gender, Competition and the Neoliberal Subject. Gender and Education. Forthcoming. Search in Google Scholar
© 2012 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
