Abstract
Patricia Williams made a number of claims concerning the methods and practise of cladistic analysis and classification. Her argument rests upon the distinction of two kinds of hierarchy: a ‘divisional hierarchy’ depicting ‘evolutionary’ descent and the Linnean hierarchy describing taxonomic groups in a classification. Williams goes on to outline five problems with cladistics that lead her to the conclusion that systematists should “eliminate cladism as a school of biological taxonomy and to replace it either with something that is philosophically coherent or to replace it with ‘pure’ methodology, untainted by theory” (Williams 1992, 151). Williams makes a number of points which she feels collectively add up to insurmountable problems for cladistics. We examine Williams' views concerning the ‘two hierarchies’ and consider what cladists currently understand about the status of ancestors. We will demonstrate that Williams has seriously misunderstood many modern commentators on this subject and all of her “five persistent problems” are derivable from this misunderstanding.
“Some persons believe and argue, on grounds approaching faith it seems to me, that phylogeny comes from our knowledge of evolution. Others have found to their surprise, and sometimes dismay, that phylogeny comes from our knowledge of systematics”.
Nelson (1989, 67).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty, J.: 1982, ‘Classes and Cladists’, Systematic Zoology 31, 25–34.
Brady, R. H.: 1985, ‘On the Independence of Systematics’, Cladistics 1, 113–26.
Farris, J. S.: 1977, ‘On the Phenetic Approach to Vertebrate Classification’, in M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution Plenum Press, New York, pp. 823–850.
Hennig, W.: 1950, Grundzuge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik Deutsche Zentralverlag, Berlin.
Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Hull, D. L.: 1984, ‘Cladistics Theory: Hypotheses that Blur and Grow’, in T. Duncan and T. F. Stuessy (eds), Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 5–23.
Hull, D. L.: 1988, Science as a Process University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hull, D. L.: 1990, ‘The Descriptive Attitude’. [Review of N. R. Scott-Ram Transformed Cladistics, Taxonomy and Evolution, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge], Systematic Zoology 39, 420–423.
Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Belknap Press, Cambridge.
Mayr, E. and P. D. Ashlock: 1991, Principles of Systematic Zoology, 2nd edition.
Nelson, G.: 1989, ‘Species and Taxa: Systematics and Evolution’, in D. Otte and J. A. Endler (eds.), Speciation and Its Consequences, Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, Mass., pp. 60–81.
Nelson, G.: 1992, ‘Why, After All, Must It?’, Claudistics 8, 139–46.
Nelson, G. J. and N. I. Platnick: 1981, Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.
Nelson, G. and N. I. Platnick: 1984, ‘Systematics and Evolution’, in M.-W. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism Academic Press, London, pp. 143–158.
Otte, D. and J. A. Endler: 1989, Speciation and Its Consequences, Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, Mass.
Panchen, A. L.: 1992, Classification, Evolution and the Nature of Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Patterson, C.: 1977, ‘The Contribution of Paleontology to Teleostean Phylogeny’, in M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution Plenum Press, New York, pp. 579–644.
Patterson, C.: 1981, ‘Significance of Fossils in Determining Evolutionary Relationships’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 195–223.
Patterson, C.: 1982a, ‘Morphological Characters and Homology’, in K. A. Josey and A. E. Friday (eds.), Problems in Phylogenetic Reconstruction, Academic Press, London, pp. 21–74.
Patterson, C.: 1982b, ‘Classes and Cladists or Individuals and Evolution’, Systematic Zoology 31, 284–286.
Patterson, C.: 1988, ‘The Impact of Evolutionary Theories on Systematics’, in D. L. Hawksworth (ed.), Prospects in Systematics, Systematics Associated Special Volume 36, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 59–91.
Platnick, N. I.: 1979, ‘Philosophy and the Transformation of Cladistics’, Systematic Zoology 28, 537–46.
Platnick, N. I.: 1982, ‘Defining Characters and Evolutionary Groups’, Systematic Zoology 31, 282–4.
Platnick, N. I.: 1985, ‘Philosophy and the Transformation of Cladistics Revisited’, Cladistics 1, 87–96.
Platnick, N. I. and G. J. Nelson: 1980, ‘Review’ [W. Hennig, 1979, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 2nd edition], Philosophy of Science 47, 499–502.
Rieppel, O.: 1986, ‘Species are Individuals: A Review and Critique of the Argument’, Evol. Biol. 20, 283–317.
Rieppel, O.: 1988, Fundamentals of Comparative Biology, Basel Birkhauser, Verlag.
Ridley, M.: 1986, Evolution and Classification: The Reformation of Cladism, Longman, London and New York.
Ridley, M.: 1989, ‘The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem’, Biology and Philosophy 4, 1–16.
Rosen, D. E., G. J. Nelson, and C. Patterson: 1979, ‘Introduction’, in W. Hennig, Phylogenetic Systematics University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 2nd Edition.
Scott-Ram, N. R.: 1990, Transformed Cladistics, Taxonomy and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Szalay, F. S. and W. Bock: 1991, ‘Evolutionary Theory and Systematics: Relationships Between Pattern and Process’, Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 29, 1–39.
Tassy, P.: 1992, L'Arbre a Remonter le Temps: Les Recontres de la Systematique et de l'Evolution C. Bourgois, Paris.
Williams, P.: 1992, ‘Confusion in Cladism’, Syntheses 91, 135–52.
Zangerl, R.: 1948, ‘The Methods of Comparative Anatomy and its Contribution to the Study of Evolution’, Evolution 2, 35–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, D.M., Scotland, R.W., Humphries, C.J. et al. Confusion in philosophy: A comment on Williams (1992). Synthese 108, 127–136 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414008
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414008