Abstract
The future dimensions of mathematical progress are probably harder to forecast than philosophy sometimes presumed. An unblinking trust in the notion of a possible structure has persuaded many philosophers that mathematics’ future can be outlined definitely enough to be broadly characterizable as “the science of all possible structures.” I believe that such a picture usually ignores some basic questions about mathematics’ capabilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Field, H. (1980). Science Without Numbers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hadamard, Jacques. (1952). Lectures on Cauchy’s Problem. New York: Dover. Poincaré. (1952). “Analysis and Physics.” Translated by W. J. G. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover.
Smith, D. E. and Latham, M. L. (1954). The Geometry. New York: Dover. Zemanian, A. H. (1965). Distribution Theory and Transform Analysis. New York: Dover.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, M. (2000). On the Mathematics of Spilt Milk. In: Grosholz, E., Breger, H. (eds) The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Synthese Library, vol 289. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5391-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9558-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive